Always knew that PMLA would be used against the Opposition: Sharad Pawar

IANS May 18, 2025 232 views

Veteran politician Sharad Pawar has openly criticized the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) amendments introduced during the Manmohan Singh government. During a book launch event, Pawar revealed his earlier opposition to the legal changes that potentially enable political victimization. The amendments, which shift the burden of proof to the accused, have been increasingly used by investigating agencies against opposition leaders. Uddhav Thackeray and Sanjay Raut also spoke about fighting against what they perceive as a tyrannical political regime.

"I told Manmohan Singh that when the government changes, it will be misused" - Sharad Pawar
Mumbai, May 17: Nationalist Congress Party (SP) chief Sharad Pawar on Saturday revealed that as a union minister, he had strongly expressed his opposition to former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on the amendments brought by former union finance minister P Chidambaram to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

Key Points

1

Pawar warned about PMLA amendments' potential political exploitation

2

Chidambaram's law later used against him

3

Sanjay Raut shares 100-day jail experience

4

Opposition leaders challenge ED's actions

"I was in the union cabinet. When the amendment was brought in the PMLA by Chidambaram, it put the onus of proving innocence on the accused. I opposed it. I told the then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that when the government changes, it will be misused. But my point was not accepted," said Pawar.

He reiterated that it was Chidambaram himself who fell victim to this amendment.

"I also doubted that this act would be used against the opposition," said Pawar while speaking at the release of a book titled Narkatil Swarg (Heaven in Hell) written by the Shiv Sena UBT MP Sanjay Raut, narrating his experience of 100 days in jail during his arrest under the PMLA Act. Raut was kept in Arthur Road Jail after he was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), alleging financial irregularities in the Patra Chawl redevelopment. He was later released on bail.

Pawar further added that after the change in the government, it was Chidambaram who was jailed under the PMLA Act.

The amendments brought to the original PMLA law in 2012 by the Manmohan Singh government enlarged the definition of money laundering by including activities such as concealment, acquisition, possession and use of proceeds of crime as criminal activities.

"The first thing we should do after the change in power at the state and Centre has to be changing these amendments in the PMLA Act used by ED, which are against the basic rights of individuals and political parties," said Pawar.

Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray, in his speech, said that the states should also be given the right to use the PMLA.

"We are the union of states. There have to be equal rights for all. Why can't states use the PMLA? The states should have the equal right to use the PMLA," he added.

Thackeray spoke about how attempts were made in history to destroy the Shiv Sena by putting its leaders in jail.

"We have fought many battles and have come forward by giving a fight. Many are ready to fight," he said, adding that it was time to fight and bring regime change.

On One Nation One Election, Thackeray said that the polls should be held with full transparency, and during these polls, the Prime Minister, who represents the country, should campaign for all political parties.

Raut said that he belongs to a clan which does not bow down. "Neither me, nor Saket (Gokhale), nor Sanjay Singh (of AAP), nor Anil Deshmukh (of NCP-SP). We decided that we will have to fight this tyrannical regime, but will not surrender...the country needs people like us now," he said.

Raut said that his book is a political book.

"Anyone who wants to work in opposition must read this. The one who wants to ally with the ruling side should avoid it. Dictators, too, have their limit and he gets buried one day or the other," he added.

Reader Comments

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments on the article:
R
Rajesh K.
Pawar saheb makes a valid point about laws being misused against political opponents. But why didn't he resign from cabinet if he felt so strongly? Opposition leaders now crying foul should have thought twice before creating such draconian laws. 😕
P
Priya M.
Interesting how the same politicians who brought strict laws are now facing them! Karma comes full circle. But we must ensure ED/CBI aren't used as political tools regardless of which party is in power. Justice should be blind.
A
Amit S.
Uddhav ji's point about states having PMLA powers is dangerous! Imagine if every state starts misusing it against opposition MLAs? We need to reform the law, not expand its misuse. Center should have oversight on financial crimes.
S
Sunita R.
While I don't support misuse of laws, let's not forget many opposition leaders facing ED cases have serious corruption charges. If you're clean, why fear investigation? But yes, the "innocent until proven guilty" principle must be respected.
V
Vikram J.
The bigger issue is our legal system's slow pace. If cases were decided quickly, no government could misuse agencies for long. Fix the judiciary first! A case shouldn't take 20 years to conclude. 🚨
N
Neha T.
All this political drama while common people suffer! Instead of fighting over who misused which law, leaders should focus on inflation and jobs. We need accountability for all - ruling and opposition parties alike.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags: