Tue, 4 Aug 2026 · LIVE
Updated Oct 27, 2025 · 17:24
Delhi News Updated Oct 27, 2025

Supreme Court Slams Delhi Police Over 5-Year Delay in Riots Bail Case

The Supreme Court expressed strong displeasure with Delhi Police for seeking more time to respond to bail petitions. Justices Aravind Kumar and N.V. Anjaria rejected the police's request for a two-week extension. Senior lawyers highlighted that the accused have been in jail for over five years without trial. The court has scheduled the next hearing for this Friday while directing police to file responses promptly.

2020 Delhi riots: SC pulls up police for delay in filing response to bail pleas in 'larger conspiracy' case

New Delhi, Oct 27

The Supreme Court on Monday pulled up the Delhi Police for seeking additional time to file its counter-affidavit in the bail petitions filed by student activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Meeran Haider, Gulfisha Fatima, and Shifa-ur-Rehman, all accused in the 2020 Delhi riots “larger conspiracy” case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

A Bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and N.V. Anjaria made it clear that the matter should not be delayed further and posted it for hearing on Friday, directing the Delhi Police to file their counter-affidavits in the meantime.

At the outset, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S.V. Raju, appearing for the Delhi Police, sought two weeks to file a response. However, the Justice Kumar-led Bench refused to accede to the request, observing that sufficient time had already been given.

“We have given you enough time. You may be appearing for the first time. Last time, we said issue notice and we said in open court that we will hear this matter on October 27 and dispose it of,” the apex court remarked.

When ASG Raju pressed for at least one week, the Justice Kumar-led Bench was unmoved. “What is the question of a counter-affidavit in a bail matter?” it said.

Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the petitioner side, opposed the plea for adjournment, highlighting that the accused had already spent over five years behind bars without trial.

“When the matter is about delay, there cannot be more delay,” Singhvi argued.

“The petitioners have been in jail for more than five years,” Sibal added, urging the top court to proceed with the hearing.

At this, Justice Kumar-led Bench remarked, “Mr Raju, examine if you can think of coming out with something… after all, it is a matter of bail… five years they have completed,” Justice Kumar remarked.

“Let me have a look at it, but sometimes appearances can be deceptive,” responded ASG Raju.

The Supreme Court then listed the matter for Friday.

The petitioners have challenged the Delhi High Court’s order denying them bail, which had held that there was prima facie material to suggest a conspiracy behind the 2020 riots.

The Supreme Court had issued notice to the Delhi Police on September 22. The February 2020 Delhi riots, which erupted amid protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC), claimed 53 lives and left over 700 injured.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Priya S

While I support strong action against rioters, keeping people in jail for years without trial sets a dangerous precedent. The police should have been better prepared with their response.

Arjun K

The 2020 riots were a dark chapter for Delhi. Whether guilty or innocent, everyone deserves a fair and timely trial. The Supreme Court's intervention is much needed.

Sarah B

As someone living in Delhi during those riots, I remember the fear and chaos. But the legal process must be followed properly. Police delaying tactics only undermine public trust in our institutions.

Vikram M

UAPA is a serious law and should be used carefully. If there's strong evidence, present it. If not, don't keep people incarcerated indefinitely. The court is right to push for resolution.

Kavya N

Five years in jail without conviction? This is heartbreaking for their families. The legal system needs to be more efficient. Hope justice prevails soon for all involved.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked