Key Points

The Supreme Court has finalized the acquittal of Samsung Chairman Lee Jae-yong in a high-profile 2015 merger case. Prosecutors had accused him of stock manipulation and fraud to secure control of the conglomerate. The ruling also cleared 13 other executives, including former Samsung strategist Choi Gee-sung. The case had been closely watched as part of Lee's succession following his father's health crisis.

Key Points: Samsung Chairman Lee Jae-yong Cleared in 2015 Merger Case by Supreme Court

  • Lee Jae-yong acquitted of all 19 initial charges
  • Case tied to succession after Lee Kun-hee's health crisis
  • Prosecutors alleged merger aimed at securing control cheaply
  • 13 others, including Choi Gee-sung, also cleared
2 min read

2015 merger case: Supreme Court finalises acquittal of Samsung Chairman Lee

South Korea's Supreme Court upholds acquittal of Samsung Chairman Lee Jae-yong in 2015 merger case involving Cheil Industries and Samsung C&T.

"The Supreme Court dismissed the prosecution's appeal, saying there were no errors in the original ruling. — Yonhap News"

Seoul, July 17

The Supreme Court on Thursday finalised the acquittal of Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong in a controversial merger case dating back to 2015.

The verdict came four years and 10 months after Lee was indicted on charges of unfair trading, stock price manipulation and accounting fraud in the merger of two Samsung affiliates, Cheil Industries and Samsung C&T Corp, in 2015, reports Yonhap news agency.

The merger was seen as crucial to Lee's succession as heir of the family-controlled group, as his father, Lee Kun-hee, had suffered a heart attack the previous year.

Prosecutors argued the merger and other alleged irregularities were intended to help Lee solidify control of South Korea's largest conglomerate at minimal cost.

Lee was acquitted of all 19 charges in the first trial and all 23 charges in the second trial after additional charges were added.

The Supreme Court dismissed the prosecution's appeal, saying there were no errors in the original ruling.

The court also finalised the acquittals of 13 other people implicated in the case, including Choi Gee-sung, former head of Samsung's now-disbanded control tower Future Strategy Office.

In February this year, the prosecution said it will appeal the recent acquittal of Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong in relation to a 2015 merger case to the Supreme Court.

On Monday, the Seoul High Court upheld the acquittal of Lee in accounting fraud and other irregularities related to the controversial merger of two Samsung affiliates -- Cheil Industries and Samsung C&T Corp.

The appellate court confirmed the not-guilty verdict for Lee, who was indicted on charges of involvement in stock price manipulation, accounting fraud and other irregularities during the merger, which prosecutors suspect was aimed at taking control of South Korea's biggest conglomerate at a lower cost, according to the report.

—IANS

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Samsung makes great phones but this shows how chaebols operate in Korea. In India, we need stronger corporate governance laws to prevent such family-controlled business monopolies. #CorporateEthics
A
Arjun K
After 5 years of legal battle, if Supreme Court says no wrongdoing then we should respect the verdict. But makes you wonder - do rich always get away? 🤔 Same happens with our industrialists sometimes.
S
Sarah B
As an expat in India, I find this case interesting. Samsung is such a big investor here - hope this verdict doesn't affect their operations. Their manufacturing plants provide so many jobs!
K
Karthik V
Typical corporate drama! First they make him run around courts for years, then acquit. Meanwhile Samsung India keeps launching new phones every month. Business as usual 😂
N
Neha E
With all due respect to judiciary, this seems like a technical acquittal rather than moral clearance. Such cases show why we need global corporate governance standards. Still using my Galaxy though! ✌️

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50