Key Points

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh has called out Home Minister Amit Shah for spreading misinformation about VP candidate Justice Sudershan Reddy. Twenty eminent legal personalities including retired Supreme Court judges have exposed Shah's false claims regarding the Salwa Judum judgment. Shah had accused Reddy of supporting Naxalism through his judicial ruling, which the former judge clarified was a collective Supreme Court decision. The controversy centers on the court's move to disband the armed vigilante group in Chhattisgarh's Maoist-affected regions.

Key Points: 20 Legal Experts Expose Amit Shah Lies on VP Candidate Sudershan Reddy

  • 20 retired judges and jurists challenge Amit Shah's allegations against VP candidate
  • Shah accused Reddy of aiding Naxalism through Salwa Judum judgment
  • Supreme Court ruling disbanded armed vigilante group in Chhattisgarh
  • Reddy clarified judgment was delivered by apex court collectively
2 min read

20 legal minds called out Home Minister's lies on VP candidate: Jairam Ramesh 

Congress' Jairam Ramesh reveals 20 eminent jurists called out Home Minister Amit Shah's false claims about VP candidate Justice Sudershan Reddy's Salwa Judum ruling.

"The Union Home Minister... is a 2-in-1 WMD--a Weapon of Malicious Defamation as well as a Weapon of Mischievous Distortion - Jairam Ramesh"

New Delhi, Aug 25

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh on Monday took objection to Home Minister Amit Shah’s remarks on the Opposition’s Vice-Presidential candidate B. Sudershan Reddy, in which he accused the latter of ‘diluting’ the country’s fight against Naxalism with his ruling on Salwa Judum, an armed vigilante group that was formed in Chhattisgarh to quell Maoist insurgency.

Congress communications in-charge took to X to vent his displeasure over Amit Shah’s accusations and said that many “courageous people, including the retired judges and jurists, have called out his lies”.

“20 of the most eminent legal personalities of India - including retired Supreme Court Judges, retired Chief Justices of High Courts, and retired Judges of High Courts - have now exposed his lies regarding Justice B. Sudershan Reddy garu, the joint Opposition candidate for the Vice Presidential election,” Ramesh stated in an X post.

Further in a satirical taunt, he said, “The Union Home Minister that our country has the great misfortune of having is a 2-in-1 WMD--a Weapon of Malicious Defamation as well as a Weapon of Mischievous Distortion. But there are still people in India courageous enough to call him out.”

The controversy erupted over the Opposition’s VP candidate, Sudershan Reddy, also a former Supreme Court judge, after Amit Shah allegedly labelled him as a supporter of Maoism and also pointed fingers at him for ‘aiding’ the Maoists with the Salwa Judum ruling.

Amit Shah, speaking at an event in Kerala recently, remarked, "Sudershan Reddy is the person who helped Naxalism. He gave Salwa Judum judgment. If the Salwa Judum judgment had not been given, the Naxal terror would have vanished by 2020."

This was, however, countered by Sudershan Reddy, who stated that the judgement was not given by him but by the Apex court.

The ruling by the top court disbanded the Salwa Judum outfit and deemed illegal the recruitment of tribal youth to fight Maoist insurgency in Chhattisgarh and adjoining regions.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Salwa Judum was a complicated issue. While we need strong action against Naxalism, we can't ignore human rights concerns. The court had to balance both aspects.
A
Aman W
Both sides are politicizing this issue. Instead of debating past judgments, we need practical solutions to end Naxalism forever. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
S
Sarah B
As someone who has worked in tribal areas, I can say the situation is far more complex than politicians make it seem. Simplistic narratives don't help anyone.
V
Vikram M
When 20 eminent legal minds speak, we should listen. Judiciary should be above political mudslinging. Respect for institutions is what makes democracy strong.
N
Nikhil C
While I support strong action against Naxalism, calling a former Supreme Court judge a "supporter of Maoism" is crossing the line. We need more respectful discourse.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50