Key Points

Indian vice-captain Rishabh Pant has been officially reprimanded by the ICC for showing dissent during the first Test against England. The incident occurred when Pant threw the ball on the ground after umpires refused to change it during England's batting innings. Despite his exceptional performance with bat, scoring twin hundreds, Pant received a demerit point for breaching the conduct code. The Leeds Test remains evenly poised, with both teams still in contention for victory.

Key Points: Pant Reprimanded for Dissent in Fiery England Test Clash

  • Pant breached ICC Code of Conduct during England's first innings
  • Received official reprimand and one demerit point
  • Incident occurred during 61st over with Harry Brook batting
  • No disciplinary hearing as Pant admitted offense
2 min read

1st Test: Pant reprimanded for showing dissent at umpire's decision on day 3

India's Rishabh Pant receives official ICC reprimand for on-field conduct during tense first Test at Headingley

"Ball condition is crucial for players, but respect for umpires is paramount - Cricket Ethics Expert"

Leeds, June 24

India vice-captain Rishabh Pant has been handed an official reprimand for breaching Level 1 of the ICC Code of Conduct during the first Test against England at Headingley, the ICC said on Tuesday.

Pant, who had an exceptional outing with the bat during the ongoing Test with his twin hundreds in the game, was reprimanded for his on-field conduct during England's first innings with the bat.

Pant was found to have breached Article 2.8 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, which relates to "showing dissent at an Umpire's decision during an international match."

In addition to this, one demerit point has been added to Pant's disciplinary record, for whom it was the first offence in 24 months.

In the 61st over of England's innings, when Harry Brook and Ben Stokes were batting, Pant was seen having a discussion with the umpires regarding the condition of the ball.

When the umpires refused to change the ball after checking it with the ball gauge, the wicket-keeper showed his dissent by throwing the ball on the ground in front of the umpires.

There was no disciplinary hearing, as Pant admitted to the offence and accepted the sanction proposed by Richie Richardson of the ICC Elite Panel of Match Referees.

The charges were brought in by the on-field umpires, Chris Gaffaney and Paul Reiffel, along with the third umpire, Sharfuddoula Ibne Shahid and the fourth umpire, Mike Burns.

Level 1 breaches carry a minimum penalty of an official reprimand, a maximum penalty of 50 per cent of a player's match fee, and one or two demerit points.

The Leeds Test is evenly poised, with the hosts needing 350 runs to win the contest on Day 5, with all 10 wickets intact.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Amit K.
Pant needs to control his emotions on field. As vice-captain, he should set an example for younger players. That being said, his passion is what makes him such an exciting player to watch! Hope he learns from this and comes back stronger 💪
P
Priya M.
The umpires were too harsh here! Everyone knows how the Dukes ball behaves in England. Pant was just trying to protect our bowlers' interests. Sometimes passion gets mistaken for dissent 😒
R
Rahul S.
Double standards much? English players get away with worse behavior all the time. Remember Broad's antics? ICC always seems stricter with Asian players. Just saying...
S
Sneha P.
Let's not forget Pant's brilliant performance with the bat! Two centuries in this test match is no joke. One small mistake shouldn't overshadow his incredible contribution to the team 🇮🇳
V
Vikram J.
As much as I love Pant's aggressive style, he needs to channel it better. Throwing the ball down was unnecessary - could have made his point more professionally. Still our X-factor player though!
N
Neha R.
The real issue is consistency in umpiring decisions. If the ball was out of shape, they should have changed it. Pant was right to question, just went about it the wrong way. Hope this doesn't affect his confidence!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50