19 States Sue Trump Admin Over $100,000 H-1B Fee: Why It's "Unlawful"

A big group of state legal leaders is taking the Trump administration to court over a huge new visa fee. They say charging $100,000 for a new H-1B visa is not only unfair but actually illegal. The lawsuit argues this fee will cripple universities and hospitals that need to hire skilled professionals from abroad. States from Oregon to New York have joined the fight, claiming the rule was implemented improperly.

Key Points: 19 State AGs Sue Trump Over $100K H-1B Visa Fee Policy

  • Lawsuit claims the $100,000 fee violates federal law by bypassing Congressional authority
  • Argues the policy harms public-sector employers like universities and hospitals
  • Alleges the administration skipped mandatory public comment procedures
  • Fee threatens to leave critical research and teaching positions vacant
3 min read

19 US state attorneys general sue Trump admin over USD 100,000 H-1B visa fee

A coalition of 19 state attorneys general sues the Trump administration, calling a new $100,000 H-1B visa fee unlawful and harmful to employers.

"This enormous fee would make it nearly impossible for these institutions to hire the experts they need, and it goes far beyond what Congress ever intended. - Oregon AG Dan Rayfield"

Oregon, December 14

A coalition of 19 US state attorneys general, led by Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, has filed a lawsuit against the Trump Administration challenging its policy imposing a USD 100, 000 fee on new H-1B visa petitions, calling the move unlawful and harmful to employers facing critical labour shortages.

In a press release issued by the Oregon Department of Justice on Friday, Attorney General Rayfield said the fee would create an insurmountable financial barrier for employers, particularly public-sector and government institutions, seeking to hire highly skilled foreign workers such as physicians, researchers, nurses, and educators.

"Oregon's colleges, universities and research institutions rely on skilled international workers to keep labs running, courses on track and innovation moving forward," Rayfield said.

"This enormous fee would make it nearly impossible for these institutions to hire the experts they need, and it goes far beyond what Congress ever intended," he added.

The lawsuit alleges that the policy, implemented by the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), violates federal law by imposing a massive fee not authorised by Congress, bypassing required rulemaking procedures, and exceeding executive authority under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

The coalition also raised concerns that the policy grants the Secretary of Homeland Security broad discretion to determine which petitions are subject to the fee or exempt from it, potentially enabling selective enforcement.

According to the proclamation issued by US President Donald Trump on September 19, there will now be a USD 100,000 fee for new H-1B visa applications.

According to the US State Department, the new fee requirement applies only to individuals or companies filing new H-1B petitions or entering the H-1B lottery after September 21.

Current visa holders and petitions submitted before that date remain unaffected. Under the proclamation, a USD 100,000 fee must accompany every new H-1B visa petition filed after the deadline, including those submitted for entry into the 2026 lottery.

The lawsuit issued challenged this very proclamation issued by the Trump administration.

Under the H-1B visa programme, US employers can temporarily hire highly skilled foreign workers in speciality occupations requiring at least a bachelor's degree.

Congress caps most private-sector H-1B visas at 65,000 annually, with an additional 20,000 reserved for individuals holding a master's degree or higher.

The attorneys general argue that the fee far exceeds the typical H-1B filing costs, which usually range from USD 960 to USD 7,595, and is not tied to the actual cost of processing petitions, as required by law.

They also contend the administration failed to conduct the mandatory notice-and-comment process before implementing the policy.

"By imposing this fee, the Administration is exceeding the fee-setting authority granted by Congress, which requires that fees be set based on the agency's costs, rather than arbitrarily. Additionally, the Trump Administration issued the fee without going through the notice-and-comment process required by the APA and without considering the full range of impacts - especially on the provision of the critical services by government and nonprofit entities," the release stated.

Highlighting the impact on higher education, the lawsuit notes that Oregon State University currently sponsors over 150 H-1B faculty, researchers and staff, while the University of Oregon sponsors more than 50.

Both institutions rely heavily on the programme to fill critical roles, and the increased fee threatens to leave positions vacant, undermining education, research and public service missions.

According to the release, Attorney General Rayfield from Oregon is joined in the lawsuit by his counterparts from Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone who works in a US university lab with several H-1B colleagues from India, this policy is devastating. It's not just about tech companies. Our medical research and teaching would suffer without these brilliant minds. The lawsuit is absolutely necessary.
R
Rohit P
While I understand the need to protect American jobs, this is a blunt instrument. A fee hike from a few thousand to one lakh dollars? It reeks of political messaging rather than sound policy. It will hurt America's own innovation ecosystem in the long run. Many IIT graduates might just look to Europe or Canada now.
P
Priya S
My brother is an H-1B holder, a doctor. This news has caused so much anxiety in our family. It feels like the goalpost is constantly moving. Glad to see some states pushing back legally. Hope sense prevails.
M
Michael C
The legal argument seems strong - bypassing Congress and no notice-and-comment. This sets a dangerous precedent for executive overreach, regardless of one's stance on immigration. The selective enforcement possibility is particularly concerning.
K
Kavya N
This is a wake-up call for India too. We need to create more opportunities here so our best talent doesn't have to face such uncertainty abroad. Brain drain is real, but so is the struggle of those who leave. 🤞
V

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50