Trump Rules Out Force for Greenland, Demands "Immediate Negotiations" at Davos

US President Donald Trump used his address at the World Economic Forum in Davos to press for US ownership of Greenland while making his clearest statement yet that he would not use military force to acquire it. He called for "immediate negotiations" with Denmark, framing US control as a strategic necessity that would enhance NATO security. Trump criticized Denmark's historical defense record, calling the country "ungrateful" for the US role in protecting Greenland during World War II. His remarks have opened a significant diplomatic rift with European allies, with NATO's chief calling for "thoughtful diplomacy" as tensions rise.

Key Points: Trump Pushes for US Control of Greenland, Rules Out Military Force

  • Rules out military action for acquisition
  • Calls for immediate US-Denmark negotiations
  • Claims US control would strengthen NATO
  • Criticizes Denmark as "ungrateful"
  • Greenland PM warns population to prepare
4 min read

"I won't use force": Trump presses for Greenland control at WEF Davos 2026, calls for "immediate negotiations"

At Davos, President Trump demands immediate negotiations for US ownership of Greenland but firmly states he will not use military force to acquire it.

"I won't use force. - Donald Trump"

Davos, January 21

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday asserted he would not use force to acquire Greenland, marking his clearest statement yet ruling out military action even as he pressed for US control of the Arctic island during an address at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

"We probably won't get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force, where we would be, frankly, unstoppable," Trump said. "But I won't do that. Okay. Now everyone says, oh, good."

Trump said his remarks were aimed at addressing speculation over the possible use of military power.

"That's probably the biggest statement I made, because people thought I would use force. I don't have to use force. I don't want to use force. I won't use force," he said.

Reiterating his demand for control of Greenland, Trump said, "All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland."

He later underlined that he envisioned full US ownership of Greenland rather than an expanded agreement.

"All we're asking for is to get Greenland, including right title and ownership, because you need the ownership to defend it," Trump said. "You can't defend it on a lease."

Calling for talks with European allies, Trump urged "immediate negotiations" on a potential US acquisition of Greenland, which is an autonomous territory of Denmark, a NATO member.

Laying out what he described as the strategic case for the move, Trump said, "It's the United States alone that can protect this giant mass of land, this giant piece of ice, develop it and improve it and make it so that it's good for Europe and safe for Europe and good for us."

"And that's the reason I'm seeking immediate negotiations to once again discuss the acquisition of Greenland by the United States, just as we have acquired many other territories throughout our history, as many of the European nations have," he added.

Trump also argued that US control of Greenland would strengthen the NATO alliance.

"This would not be a threat to NATO. This would greatly enhance the security of the entire alliance, the NATO alliance," he said, adding that he believes the US has been "treated very unfairly by NATO."

Reiterating his demand for control of Greenland, Trump said "no nation or group of nations is in any position to be able to secure Greenland, other than the United States."

"Every NATO ally has an obligation to be able to defend their own territory," he said. "We're a great power, much greater than people even understand."

Trump also criticised Denmark over Greenland, calling it "ungrateful" and linking his remarks to World War II-era events.

"Denmark fell to Germany after just six hours of fighting, and was totally unable to defend either itself or Greenland. So the United States was then compelled, and we did it," Trump said, while referring to the US role in defending the territory.

Lamenting the US decision at the time to allow Denmark to retain Greenland as a territory, Trump said, "How stupid were we to do that?"

"But we did it, but we gave it back. But how ungrateful are they now?" he added.

Trump's remarks came as Greenland continued to dominate diplomatic conversations at Davos, with his push to acquire the autonomous territory opening one of the biggest rifts between Washington and its western allies in decades. Trump earlier said he would hold a number of meetings on Greenland at the summit.

Asked how far he was prepared to go to acquire Greenland from Denmark, a fellow NATO member, Trump told reporters, "You'll find out."

As allies responded to Trump's claims, NATO chief Mark Rutte said on Wednesday that "thoughtful diplomacy" was needed as tensions rise within the alliance.

"There are these tensions at the moment, there's no doubt," Rutte said.

France also called for a NATO exercise in Greenland and said it was ready to contribute, Macron's office said.

Greenland's Prime Minister said on Tuesday that the island's population of 57,000 must be prepared for military force.

Trump's appearance at Davos followed a delayed arrival in Switzerland earlier in the day, after Air Force One was forced to turn back following takeoff due to what was described as a "minor electrical issue", requiring an aircraft change.

He later landed in Zurich a few hours behind schedule before travelling onward to Davos, arriving as his engagement with world leaders was being closely watched amid mounting pushback from allies over his bid to seize control of mineral-rich Greenland, a move described as having the potential to shake the global order.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone watching from outside, this is deeply unsettling. You don't just "acquire" territories and people like they are property. The 57,000 people of Greenland have a right to self-determination. Calling an ally "ungrateful" is not diplomacy, it's bullying. The world order cannot be based on such transactional relationships.
V
Vikram M
The real story here is the minerals and the Arctic sea routes opening up due to melting ice. It's all about resource security for the future. While the method is questionable, every major power is thinking about the Arctic. India needs its own clear policy for the region, and fast. 🇮🇳
P
Priya S
"I won't use force" but then says "you'll find out" when asked how far he'll go? This kind of ambiguity is dangerous and creates unnecessary tension within NATO. Stable alliances are crucial for global security, especially with challenges in our own neighbourhood. This instability helps no one.
R
Rohit P
Honestly, from an Indian perspective, this feels like a classic case of a powerful nation flexing its muscles. We've seen this playbook before. The language about defending it and needing "right title and ownership" is just a modern justification for expansion. Hope our diplomats are taking notes on how *not* to conduct foreign policy.
M
Michael C
While I understand the strategic argument, the delivery and the framing are needlessly antagonistic. You can make a case for enhanced US presence in Greenland through partnership and mutual agreement without threatening allies or revisiting WWII history to score points. This undermines the very alliance he says he wants to strengthen.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50