NCERT Class 8 Book Withdrawn Over Judiciary Chapter, SC Sees "Conspiracy"

The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has withdrawn a Class 8 Social Science textbook containing a controversial chapter on the judiciary. Officials clarified the book was drafted by a committee of subject experts, which included a lawyer, and stated there is no separate mandatory vetting process for legal content. The Supreme Court has imposed a blanket ban on the book, ordered the seizure of all copies, and suggested a "well-orchestrated conspiracy" to defame the judiciary. The Education Ministry and NCERT are now investigating how the "inappropriate textual material" was included and are taking steps to halt its digital dissemination.

Key Points: NCERT Withdraws Class 8 Book, SC Orders Seizure Over Content

  • Withdrawn textbook drafted by expert panel
  • SC sees "well-orchestrated conspiracy"
  • NCERT issues public apology
  • Education Ministry seeks halt to digital dissemination
3 min read

Withdrawn class 8 book drafted by panel including lawyer, say officials

NCERT withdraws Class 8 Social Science textbook after controversial judiciary chapter. Supreme Court calls it a "conspiracy" and orders seizure. Officials explain drafting process.

"That is not how textbooks are written. There is no mandatory clause requiring such separate vetting. - Official"

By Vishu Adhana, New Delhi, February 27

The now-withdrawn Class 8 Social Science textbook was drafted by a committee of subject experts that included a lawyer, officials said, adding that there is no separate procedure requiring chapters to be vetted independently by members of the legal fraternity.

The clarification comes amid reports claiming that the controversial chapter on the judiciary in now withdrawn book- Exploring Society: India and Beyond- was not reviewed by the legal fraternity.

When asked whether it is mandatory for a chapter dealing with the judiciary to be vetted separately by members of the legal fraternity, the official said, "That is not how textbooks are written. There is no mandatory clause requiring such separate vetting. This is a misconception."

The official said the committee comprised experts from relevant fields and that additional expertise can be invited where required.

"There is a certain process for writing textbooks. The books are written by subject experts, reviewed extensively, and eventually vetted by the National Syllabus Learning Teaching Material Committee before publication. The book is read by many people within NCERT. There is usually a lot of debate and changes before it is finalised," the official said, explaining the process of preparing the book.

However, the official acknowledged that "inappropriate textual material has crept into the textbook," calling it an error of judgment for which NCERT has already expressed regret and withdrawn the book.

The Supreme Court has called for action against those responsible for drafting the controversial chapter, observing that there appeared to be a "well-orchestrated conspiracy" to defame the judiciary. The court imposed a blanket ban on the Class 8 book and directed that all physical and digital copies be seized.

Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan also expressed dismay over the content and assured that accountability would be fixed.

NCERT on Wednesday issued a public apology and halted the distribution of the textbook after acknowledging that inappropriate material had found its way into the chapter titled "The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society."

The book, released on February 24, introduced a section discussing challenges faced by the judiciary, including corruption and case pendency.

Meanwhile, NCERT, along with the Education Ministry, has initiated steps to rectify the error, officials added.

Sources said NCERT Director Dinesh Prasad Saklani is examining the circumstances under which the content was included and will identify the persons or procedures responsible.

The Education Ministry has also written to the Ministries of Information and Broadcasting and Electronics and Information Technology, seeking immediate steps to halt the dissemination of the withdrawn textbook through digital and electronic platforms.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh Q
The Supreme Court's strong reaction is understandable. Calling it a "well-orchestrated conspiracy" is a big claim. But the officials have a point - textbooks are written by subject experts, not necessarily lawyers. The issue is the inappropriate content, not the profession of the committee member. The focus should be on fixing the content, not the committee composition.
A
Aman W
Wait, so a chapter on the judiciary wasn't reviewed by legal experts? 🤔 Even if it's not "mandatory," for such a sensitive topic, shouldn't NCERT have taken that extra step? Common sense hai yaar. The whole "multiple reviews and debates" process they describe clearly didn't work this time.
S
Sarah B
As a parent, I'm concerned. What was this "inappropriate material" exactly? The article mentions it discussed challenges like corruption and pendency. While these are real issues, the tone and context for 13-year-olds is crucial. Perhaps the error was in presentation, not topic. Transparency about the specific content would help.
V
Vikram M
Good that they are taking digital seizure seriously. In today's age, a withdrawn book can still circulate on WhatsApp and PDF sites. The Ministry's coordination with IT is a necessary move. Hope the new committee is more diligent. Our education system doesn't need these controversies.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, while the Supreme Court's concern is noted, the term "conspiracy" seems excessive for what officials call a process failure. NCERT has accepted the mistake. The system worked in catching and withdrawing it. Let's allow the internal examination to finish and see what safeguards they propose. 🔍

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50