White House Used Pakistan as Secret Channel to Iran for Ceasefire Deal

The White House relied on Pakistan as a crucial intermediary to reach Iran and negotiate a temporary ceasefire, according to a Financial Times report. Pakistan's Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir led the effort, coordinating directly with senior US officials and shuttling proposals between Washington and Tehran. The diplomacy resulted in a two-week ceasefire announcement, even as President Trump publicly escalated his rhetoric against Iran. A separate New York Times report revealed that a social media appeal by Pakistan's Prime Minister was cleared by the White House before posting, indicating deeper coordination than publicly acknowledged.

Key Points: US Used Pakistan for Back-Channel Iran Diplomacy: Report

  • US used Pakistan as primary channel to Iran
  • Pakistan's army chief led coordination with US officials
  • Islamabad shuttled US and Iranian proposals
  • Ceasefire announced amid Trump's public threats
  • Sharif's social media post was White House-cleared
2 min read

White House forced Pakistan to reach Iran: Report

Report reveals White House leaned on Pakistan to broker temporary Iran ceasefire via army chief, transmitting US plans and Iranian counter-proposals.

"Pakistan's positioning as a Muslim-majority neighbour was seen as key - Financial Times"

Washington, April 9

The White House used Pakistan as a primary channel to reach Iran on a temporary ceasefire, underscoring Islamabad's pivotal yet contested role in sensitive back-channel diplomacy, the Financial Times, London, reported.

For weeks, the Trump administration leaned on Islamabad to persuade Tehran to accept a pause in fighting tied to reopening the Strait of Hormuz. Pakistan's positioning as a Muslim-majority neighbour was seen as key to making the US-backed proposal more acceptable to Iran.

The effort was led by Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir, who coordinated closely with senior US officials. As the deadline approached, Munir held calls with President Donald Trump, Vice-President JD Vance and special envoy Steve Witkoff, while Pakistani officials shuttled proposals between Washington and Tehran.

Islamabad transmitted a US-drafted 15-point plan and conveyed Iran's responses, including five- and 10-point counter-proposals. Diplomats said Iran gradually became more open to limiting aspects of its nuclear programme, but only after sustained back-channel engagement.

The diplomacy culminated in a two-week ceasefire announced by the US, Iran and Israel, even as Trump publicly escalated rhetoric, warning he could destroy Iran's "whole civilisation" if his terms were not met.

In a different report, The New York Times said that Pakistan's public messaging was closely aligned with Washington's position.

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's social media appeal seeking an extension of Trump's deadline was seen and cleared by the White House before it was posted, suggesting deeper coordination than publicly acknowledged, the daily said.

The report said the post, which framed diplomacy as "progressing steadily, strongly and powerfully", came as Trump's deadline approached and Islamabad sought to create an off-ramp for both sides. The White House's prior approval of the message pointed to active diplomatic engagement behind the scenes, even as public rhetoric remained confrontational, the New York Times said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The report shows how complex global diplomacy is. Pakistan's position as a Muslim-majority country was key here. While the ceasefire is good for regional stability, the fact that the PM's social media post was cleared by the White House is... telling. 🤔
R
Rohit P
Trump's rhetoric is dangerous ("destroy Iran's whole civilisation") but behind the scenes, diplomacy is working. It's a classic good cop, bad cop strategy. Pakistan's army chief seems to be the main player, not the civilian government. That's the real story.
S
Sarah B
From an international perspective, any channel that prevents escalation is welcome. The Strait of Hormuz is critical for global oil supplies. If Pakistan helped secure a temporary pause, that's a positive development, regardless of the politics involved.
V
Vikram M
This just proves Pakistan will do anything for US favour and dollars. They play all sides. One day they are "brothers" with Iran, next day they are transmitting US plans to them. No principles, only opportunism. India would never be used as a messenger like this.
K
Karthik V
A respectful criticism: The article frames this as Pakistan being "forced," but it seems they were quite willing participants seeking relevance. The real credit should go to the diplomats working silently. Public posturing by leaders often hides the actual work being done.
A

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50