White House Credits Trump's Diplomacy for Iran Allowing Oil Tankers Through Hormuz

The White House claims that Iran's decision to allow oil tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz is a result of ongoing direct and indirect talks between the US and Iran. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt credited diplomatic efforts led by President Donald Trump for enabling the movement of the vessels. President Trump himself framed Iran's allowance of 20 tankers as a "sign of respect" toward the United States. These statements come amid reports and denials of Iran imposing informal controls or tolls on shipping in the strategic waterway.

Key Points: US Credits Trump Diplomacy for Iran Oil Tanker Passage

  • US credits talks for tanker passage
  • Trump calls move a 'sign of respect'
  • White House rejects Iran 'toll booth' claims
  • Strait of Hormuz tensions remain high
3 min read

White House claims Iran allowing oil tankers through Hormuz is result of US-Iran talks, Trump's diplomacy

White House claims Iran's allowance of oil tankers through Strait of Hormuz is a direct result of ongoing US-Iran talks and President Trump's diplomacy.

"you wouldn't have seen those tankers if not for the president's diplomacy - Karoline Leavitt"

Washington DC, March 31

The White House on Monday claimed that the recent movement of oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, despite a virtual blockage amid the West Asia conflict, is the result of ongoing direct and indirect talks between the United States and Iran.

It credited diplomatic efforts led by US President Donald Trump.

Addressing a press briefing, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt rejected claims that Iran is selectively allowing certain tankers to pass or imposing informal controls over maritime traffic.

"That's not something we support, and I would reject that they are cherry-picking. In fact, these tankers that are moving through - the 10 that were previously announced and now the new 20, the announcement of 20 additional tankers, which we expect to see over the coming days - are a result of the direct and indirect talks that are taking place between the United States and Iran," she claimed.

Leavitt further insisted that such tanker movements would not have been possible without sustained diplomatic engagement by the US administration led by Trump.

"So, you wouldn't have seen those tankers if not for the president's diplomacy and his team engaging on this matter, which we expect that compliance moving forward, and it's again something that we're working on very closely," she added.

Earlier on Sunday, Trump said that Iran is allowing 20 oil tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz as a "sign of respect".

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said that Iran initially agreed to send 10 boats through the strait and then added 10 more, which he considers a positive development.

"We have emissaries, but we are also dealing directly, and as you know, they've agreed to send 8 boats two days ago, and then they added another two, so it was 10 boats. And now today, they gave us, as a tribute, I don't know, I can't define it exactly, but they gave us, I think, out of a sign of respect, 20 boats of oil, big, big boats of oil going through the Hormuz Strait," the US President said.

Meanwhile, responding to a question on whether the administration supports any system where Iran could impose tolls or restrictions on vessels passing through the strategic waterway, Leavitt made it clear that such an arrangement is not backed by Washington.

The remarks come in the context of a new report from the Shipping News website, Lloyd's List, suggesting that Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) imposed a de facto 'toll booth' in the Strait of Hormuz as the conflict in West Asia has put enormous stress on one of the key global shipping routes.

This requires vessels to submit full documentation, obtain clearance codes and accept IRGC-escorted passage through a single controlled corridor, the report stated.

The Strait of Hormuz remains a critical global energy chokepoint, and recent developments come amid heightened tensions in the region, even as diplomatic channels between Washington and Tehran continue to remain active.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As an Indian, my main concern is the impact on global oil prices. If tankers are moving, that's good news. But the report about an IRGC 'toll booth' is worrying. We rely heavily on oil imports through that strait. Any instability there directly hits our pockets. Hope diplomacy continues for everyone's sake.
R
Rohit P
Trump's diplomacy? More like Trump's ego. The White House statement and the shipping report completely contradict each other. One says it's free movement due to talks, the other says Iran is controlling a corridor. Which is it? This kind of confusion is bad for global trade. India needs clear facts, not political spin.
S
Sarah B
While the US-Iran dynamic is complex, any reduction in tension is welcome. The Strait of Hormuz is too important to become a zone of conflict. From an international perspective, sustained dialogue is the only way forward, regardless of who claims credit.
V
Vikram M
This is a classic case of "my way or the highway" diplomacy. The US rejects any notion of Iran having control, but the ground reports suggest otherwise. India has good relations with both nations. Perhaps we can play a more active role as a neutral mediator to ensure energy security for all.
K
Kavya N
Let's be practical. If oil is flowing, it benefits consumers worldwide, including us. The political posturing between Washington and Tehran is an old story. As a common citizen, I'm just happy if my petrol and diesel prices don't shoot up next month! Fingers crossed. 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50