When Girish Karnad said television didn't threaten theatre, served audiences who couldn't afford entertainment
Mumbai, June 10
Celebrated playwright, actor and filmmaker late Girish Karnad had once offered a nuanced perspective on the relationship between theatre and newer forms of entertainment such as the medium of television and video.
Further arguing that the rise of television and video should not be viewed as a threat to theatre, Girish had said that it should be viewed as means of bringing art and entertainment to a wider audience.
Reflecting on the evolution of performing arts, Karnad, in an old interview with Doordarshan, noted that Indian entertainment had continuously adapted to changing times.
He pointed out that folk theatre dominated the 19th century before company theatre emerged, followed by cinema in the 1930s. He emphasized on how the subsequent arrival of television and video only expanded the number of artistic mediums available to audiences.
Speaking about the changing landscape, Karnad said, "How to make theatre prosper is another question, you know, we have to go into the mechanics of it. But the point is, in the 19th century there was only folk theatre, then we got company theatres, then in the 30s we got films. Then came television, then there's video, and so the number of art forms is proliferating, and it's available, it's reaching further."
The acclaimed writer had stressed that television played an important social role by reaching people who otherwise had little or no access to cultural experiences.
"I don't regret that, because I think television and video go to people who could never dream of coming to theatre, who couldn't afford theatre, women, servants, people who are bedridden, menials. I wouldn't regret television at all, because they entertain people who had no entertainment before," he said.
Talking about Girish Karnad, he was widely regarded as one of India's most influential literary and cultural figures.
Girish Karnad, for the uninitiated, was a playwright, actor, director and public intellectual whose work transformed modern Indian theatre. His acclaimed plays, including 'Tughlaq', 'Hayavadana', 'Nagamandala', 'Yayati' and 'Taledanda', are even till today considered landmarks of contemporary Indian drama.
Apart from his contributions to theatre, Karnad enjoyed a distinguished career in cinema. As an actor, he appeared in notable films such as 'Manthan', 'Nishant', 'Swami', 'Iqbal', 'Dor', 'Ek Tha Tiger' and with 'Tiger Zinda Hai' as his last. He had also directed and written many acclaimed films and was honoured with some of India's highest civilian and artistic awards, including the Jnanpith Award, Padma Shri and Padma Bhushan.
For the uninitiated, Girish Karnad passed away in June 2019 at the age of 81.
— IANS
Reader Comments
As someone who works in regional theatre in Karnataka, I partly agree with Karnad ji. TV did bring entertainment to the masses, but it also changed audience expectations. Now people want quick, visual content and that's hurting theatre economics. But yes, I can't deny the social good he mentions - maids and daily wagers who can't afford ₹500 tickets do deserve entertainment.
I'm an expat living in Bangalore and I've seen how theatre here struggles. Karnad's quote about "women, servants, people who are bedridden" really struck me. In the West, we sometimes forget the privilege of accessing live performances. TV isn't the enemy - it's a bridge to those who can't cross the economic divide.
Interesting take, but I think today OTT has replaced television as the new threat to theatre. Karnad's logic applies even more now - Netflix and Amazon reach people who never go to theatres. But the real question remains: how do we make theatre survive when everyone's glued to their screens? He didn't fully answer that. 🤔
I remember watching 'Tughlaq' on Doordarshan as a child and being mesmerized. That play made me fall in love with Indian history. Karnad ji's genius was in understanding that art doesn't diminish when it reaches more people - it grows. The man was truly ahead of his time. Miss him still. 🌹
While I respect Karnad's legacy, I think he was slightly idealistic here. Television in India became commercial and formulaic - it didn't always bring quality art to people. Look at reality shows
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.