ECI Opposes Bengal's "Irregular" Action Against 4 Poll Officials

The Election Commission of India has formally opposed the disciplinary action initiated by the West Bengal government against four election officials, declaring it "procedurally irregular" for being finalized without the mandatory consultation with the Commission. In a letter to the state's Chief Secretary, the ECI stated it does not accept the action and has demanded a written explanation for the lapse by January 24. The Commission has also requested the complete disciplinary case records of all four officials involved. This development occurs amid an ongoing dispute between the state government and the ECI over the Special Intensive Revision of the electoral roll.

Key Points: ECI Rejects Bengal's Disciplinary Action on Officials

  • ECI opposes action against 4 officials
  • Says state did not consult poll body
  • Demands explanation and records by Jan 24
  • Part of ongoing tussle over electoral roll
3 min read

West Bengal: ECI opposes disciplinary action against four election officials, says "finalised without mandatory consultation"

Election Commission says West Bengal govt finalized action against 4 election officials without mandatory consultation, calls it procedurally irregular.

"treated as procedurally irregular and non est in the eyes of the Commission - Election Commission of India"

New Delhi, January 21

The Election Commission of India on Wednesday opposed the disciplinary action initiated against four election officials in West Bengal, stating that the concerned authority did not consult the poll body before finalising the move.

In a letter to the West Bengal Chief Secretary, the ECI said that the disciplinary action will be treated as "procedurally irregular" and warrant reconsideration.

According to the ECI, the state government issued directions for "suspension and initiation of suitable disciplinary proceedings against the concerned EROs/AEROs and for lodging of FIRs against the erring officials, including the contractual Data Entry operator, under section 32 of the RP Act, 1950, read with the relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Information Technology Act, 2000."

As per the letter, an election official was exonerated, and a minor penalty was imposed on another Assistant Electoral Registration Officer (AERO).

"Commission's instructions... mandates that disciplinary authorities shall mandatorily consult the Election Commission before closing or finalising any matter arising out of disciplinary proceedings initiated on the recommendation of the Commission," the letter read.

The ECI stated, "Since the disciplinary proceedings have been finalised without adherence to the prescribed procedure and without mandatory consultation with the Commission, the Commission does not accept such finalisation of disciplinary action. Accordingly, the same shall be treated as procedurally irregular and non est in the eyes of the Commission, warranting reconsideration strictly in accordance with the Commission's instructions."

The poll body has demanded a "written explanation... from the competent authority/officer responsible for the aforesaid procedural lapse, clearly explaining the circumstances that led to non-compliance with the Commission's instructions."

ECI also requested for "the complete disciplinary case records, including the articles of charge, written statements of defence, inquiry reports, findings of the inquiry authority, orders of the disciplinary authority, file noting and all other relevant records forming the basis of the disciplinary action taken, in respect of all the four officials namely Tathagata Mondal, Debottam Dutta Choudhury, Biplab Sarkar and Sudipta Das."

The Bengal Chief Secretary is required to submit the information for the Commission's consideration by 5:00 PM on January 24.

This comes amid the ongoing tussle between the TMC-led state government in West Bengal and the ECI over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral roll in the state.

Meanwhile, the deadline to file claims and objections in the SIR exercise was extended from January 15 to January 19, giving voters extra time to submit their applications (new voter name additions via Form 6, deletions via Form 7, and corrections via Form 8). Further, hearings on these claims and objections will continue up to February 7. The Final electoral roll for West Bengal will be published on February 14.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
Another day, another tussle between Kolkata and Delhi. While the ECI's point about procedure is technically correct, one has to wonder if this constant friction helps the common voter. We just want a clean electoral roll and a fair election, not this bureaucratic ping-pong.
A
Arjun K
Good move by ECI. Protocols exist for a reason. If the state government bypassed mandatory consultation, then the action is void. This protects the autonomy of election machinery. Hope the Chief Secretary provides a satisfactory explanation.
P
Priya S
The timing is suspicious, right before the final electoral roll publication. Were these officials acting against the ruling party's interests? The ECI's intervention ensures the process isn't politicized. Transparency is key! 🔑
D
David E
Observing from outside, this seems like a crucial check and balance in action. An independent election commission is vital for any democracy. The state government should follow the established procedure to avoid any perception of bias.
K
Karthik V
With due respect to the ECI, I hope this isn't just about procedure but also about the merit of the case. What exactly did these four officials do? The article is vague. Were they negligent? The public deserves to know the substance, not just the process.
M
Meera T
<

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50