Trump Calls Iran "Very Difficult" as Nuclear Talks Reach Critical Juncture

US President Donald Trump has publicly described Iran as "very difficult" and "very dangerous" as another round of nuclear negotiations is set to take place. He emphasized that the United States faces a significant decision and that any potential deal must be substantive and meaningful. The comments come amid a backdrop of ongoing military tensions and a US military build-up in the Middle East. Trump stated a preference for a peaceful resolution but expressed dissatisfaction with Iran's approach to the negotiations.

Key Points: Trump on Iran Nuclear Talks: "Very Difficult People"

  • Trump calls Iran "very difficult" and "very dangerous"
  • US faces a "big decision" in nuclear talks
  • Any deal with Tehran must be "meaningful"
  • Talks continue amid US military build-up in Middle East
3 min read

"We have a big decision to make... they're very difficult people": Trump on nuclear talks with Iran

US President Donald Trump describes Iran as "very dangerous" as critical nuclear negotiations continue, emphasizing a preference for a peaceful resolution.

"We have a big decision to make... they're very difficult people. - Donald Trump"

Texas, February 28

US President Donald Trump on Friday described Iran as "very difficult" and "very dangerous" as the United States considers its next steps in nuclear negotiations, emphasising a preference for a peaceful resolution despite ongoing military tensions in the Middle East.

The third round of negotiations between Iran and the United States took place in Geneva on Thursday, and another round of talks will be held today.

Addressing a gathering in Texas, Trump said, "We have a big decision to make. You know that. Not easy. We have a very big decision to make. We have a country that's been for 47 years blowing people's legs off, arms off, and the face. They've been knocking out ships, killing people. Not only Americans, but lots of people."

Trump said the US faces a "big decision" in talks with Iran, while saying that any deal with Tehran must be "meaningful."

"We hit them real hard, as you know, with those beautiful B2 bombers, and recently knocked out their nuclear capability. But I'd rather do it the peaceful way, but they're very difficult people. I want to tell you that they're very dangerous people, very difficult people," he said.

"It's been terrible. 32,000 people have been killed over the last two to three months. They want to make a deal, but got to make a deal that's meaningful. I spoke with Ted Cruz, John, and all of them. On the way here, I said, "Well, got to make a deal that's meaningful," he said.

The latest round of talks comes amid ongoing diplomatic efforts to ease tensions between Tehran and Washington and comes against the backdrop of a significant US military build-up in the Middle East, as several countries advised their citizens to leave Iran amid concerns over potential US strikes.

Earlier in the day, Trump said he is "not exactly happy" with Iran's handling of negotiations over its nuclear program, stressing that the country cannot possess nuclear weapons.

Speaking to reporters, Trump said, "We haven't made a final decision (on Iran). We're not exactly happy with the way they're negotiating. They cannot have nuclear weapons. And we're not thrilled with the way they're negotiating. So we'll see how it all works."

"I am not happy with the fact that they are not willing to give us what we have to have. I'm not thrilled with that. We'll see what happens. We'll have some additional talks today. But, no, I'm not happy with the way they're going," he said.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The language used here is so aggressive. Calling an entire nation "very difficult people" isn't exactly diplomatic. There has to be a better way to negotiate than public posturing and threats.
A
Arjun K
India has good relations with both the US and Iran. We have a lot at stake. Our Chabahar port project with Iran is crucial for connectivity to Afghanistan and Central Asia. Hope our diplomats are closely watching and engaging with both sides behind the scenes.
P
Priya S
The mention of 32,000 people killed is chilling. War is never the answer. The international community, including countries like India, should push harder for dialogue. The focus should be on the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, not on regime change.
M
Michael C
From a strategic perspective, a nuclear-armed Iran would destabilize the entire region. The US stance, while blunt, is clear on that red line. The challenge is finding a verification mechanism Iran will accept. It's a global security issue.
K
Kavya N
Yaar, this is giving me 2003 Iraq war vibes. The same pattern of building up military and talking about "very dangerous" people. Hope history doesn't repeat itself. The common people in Iran will suffer the most. #NoWar

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50