Sun, 14 Jun 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jun 13, 2026 · 23:36
Cricket News Updated Jun 13, 2026

"We Were 30 Runs Short": Shahidi on Afghanistan's Loss to India

Afghanistan captain Hashmatullah Shahidi admitted his team was about 30 runs short of a competitive total after losing to India in the first ODI. Despite a strong start from Rahmanullah Gurbaz, a cluster of wickets derailed Afghanistan's innings. Shahidi noted that their plan to target the left-arm spinner didn't fully pay off and repeated batting mistakes proved costly. India chased down the 195-run target with ease, thanks to Shubman Gill's unbeaten 84 and three-wicket hauls from debutants Gurnoor Brar and Harsh Dubey.

"We were 30 runs short": Hashmatullah Shahidi reflects on Afghanistan's loss to India

Dharamsala, June 13

Afghanistan skipper Hashmatullah Shahidi reflected on his side's defeat against India, noting that the visitors were well placed for a strong total when Rahmanullah Gurbaz was at the crease, but a cluster of wickets derailed their innings against the Men in Blue.

He felt the team lost momentum after a good start and ended up about 30 runs short of what could have been a competitive score. Shahidi also noted that their plan to attack the left-arm spinner didn't fully pay off, and repeated batting mistakes proved costly.

Shubman Gill's unbeaten 84, and three-wicket hauls by both the debutants Gurnoor Brar and Harsh Dubey helped India clinch a seven-wicket win over Afghanistan in the first ODI of the three-match series, at the Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association Stadium, Dharamsala, on Saturday.

"It was a tough game. I was feeling that when Gurbaz was playing, I was feeling that if we scored 220, 230, that might be a good target, but we gave some back-to-back wickets, and after that, we were short of almost 30 runs," Shahidi said after the match.

"(What was the thinking when you were batting?) I think in my mind, I was trying to target the left-arm spinner because the boundary was also shorter on that side. But I think Gurbaz played really well, but after that, we made some mistakes. It started for me, and then other batsmen. That's why we were like 30 runs short," he added.

After bowlers Brar and Dubey combined to bowl Afghanistan out for 194 in 24.5 overs in a rain-shortened 25-overs-per-side contest, India's batters responded with a blend of aggression and composure, chasing down the 195-run target with ease to seal a seven-wicket victory.

— ANI

Reader Comments

Kavya N

Honestly, I think 220-230 was always going to be tough on that Dharamsala pitch. Our spinners are getting better every series and Harsh Dubey's debut was very impressive. Afghanistan should focus on building partnerships rather than just hitting boundaries. Good fight but not enough.

James A

As a neutral cricket fan, this was an exciting match. Afghanistan's approach with the bat was too one-dimensional - all power hitting with no game awareness. When wickets fell, nobody could rebuild. Shahidi needs to take responsibility for his shot selection too. India's bowling attack looked balanced and deep.

Priya S

Shubman Gill continues to impress! His unbeaten 84 was a masterclass in chasing - he knew exactly when to attack and when to consolidate. The way he handled their spinners was top class. India's bench strength is truly incredible when debutants like Brar and Dubey can step up so smoothly. 🏏

Sarah B

Shahidi blaming the left-arm spinner plan seems like a convenient excuse. Afghanistan's batting collapse was more about panic after wickets fell than any specific bowling strategy. India's fielding was outstanding and they applied pressure brilliantly. Afghanistan needs to learn how to handle middle-overs pressure better.

Vikram M

Actually, I disagree with the 30 runs short logic. On a wicket like Dharamsala where bounce and carry was consistent, 194 was always going to be below-par. The rain interruption made it challenging for both teams but India's batting showed why they're world-beaters. Afghanistan's spin-heavy attack needs more pace options in these conditions.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked