Vivek Oberoi Moves Delhi HC Against AI Deepfakes, Fake Endorsements

Actor and businessman Vivek Oberoi has approached the Delhi High Court seeking protection of his publicity and personality rights. The suit alleges large-scale misuse of his identity through fake social media accounts, unauthorized merchandise, and AI-generated deepfake content. Oberoi contends that such acts infringe upon his constitutional rights, copyright protections, and common law rights against unfair competition. He has sought a permanent injunction and the removal of all unauthorized content exploiting his name, image, and likeness.

Key Points: Vivek Oberoi Sues in Delhi HC Over AI Misuse, Personality Rights

  • Suit against fake social media accounts
  • Action on unauthorized merchandise
  • Challenge against AI deepfakes
  • Protection of personality rights
3 min read

Vivek Oberoi moves Delhi HC to protect personality rights against AI misuse, fake endorsements

Actor Vivek Oberoi files suit in Delhi High Court against AI-generated deepfakes, fake social media accounts, and unauthorized merchandise.

"unchecked use of generative artificial intelligence poses serious risks to personality and publicity rights - Vivek Oberoi's petition"

New Delhi, February 4

Actor and Businessman Vivek Oberoi has approached the Delhi High Court seeking protection of his publicity and personality rights, alleging large-scale misuse of his identity through fake social media accounts, unauthorised merchandise and AI-generated content, including deepfake imagery.

The civil suit, filed against Collector Bazar, ZoomMantra, Indiacontent and Ors, including unidentified parties named as John Doe defendants, seeks a permanent injunction restraining infringement of Oberoi's personality and publicity rights. The suit has been filed through advocates Sana Raees Khan and Pranay Chitale.

According to the petition, Oberoi has asserted that his name, image, voice, likeness and other distinctive attributes exclusively associated with him are being unlawfully exploited for commercial and other gains without his consent or authorisation.

The plaintiff has alleged that such acts amount to infringement of his personality rights protected under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution, performer's and moral rights under Sections 38, 38A and 38B of the Copyright Act, 1957, as well as common law rights against passing off, misappropriation and unfair competition.

The plea states that the defendants are engaged in impersonating Oberoi on social media platforms such as Instagram by creating fake accounts using his name and images.

It further alleges that unauthorised merchandise bearing his name and likeness, including posters, T-shirts and postcards, is being sold across various e-commerce platforms.

Importantly, the suit flags the creation and dissemination of AI-generated content that allegedly misrepresents facts and falsely depicts the actor in a derogatory, insulting and demeaning manner. The petition also highlights the use of artificial intelligence and deepfake technology to morph and superimpose Oberoi's face onto objectionable and distasteful imagery.

Oberoi has contended that unchecked use of generative artificial intelligence poses serious risks to personality and publicity rights, leading to public confusion regarding false endorsements, dilution of personal identity, infringement of privacy and erosion of an individual's exclusive right to commercially benefit from their persona.

The petition further submits that such activities are being made available to the public at large, resulting in extensive and unbridled infringement, making it virtually impossible for the actor to identify all infringers individually. In view of this, Oberoi has sought an omnibus 'John Doe' injunction against unknown persons found violating his rights.

Claiming that he has already suffered and is likely to suffer irreparable harm to his goodwill, reputation and business interests, the actor has urged the Court to pass urgent directions. The reliefs sought include removal of unauthorised postcards, posters, videos and social media posts, along with restraining further misuse of his identity in any form.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Finally someone is taking a stand! The amount of fake celebrity accounts on Instagram selling diet teas and investment schemes is ridiculous. They use morphed pictures and AI voices. Common people are losing money believing these endorsements. Hope the court sets a strong precedent.
A
Arjun K
While I support his right to protect his image, I wonder if this will only help the rich and famous. What about the common man whose face might be used in a deepfake? We need a broader data protection and digital identity law that protects everyone, not just celebrities.
S
Sarah B
The 'John Doe' injunction is smart. It's impossible to track every single infringer individually on the internet. The e-commerce platforms and social media sites need to be held more accountable for allowing this sale of unauthorized merchandise and fake accounts to flourish on their watch.
K
Karthik V
Saw those cheap T-shirts with his face on Amazon! Quality was terrible. These sellers have no shame. Using Articles 19 & 21 is interesting - right to freedom and right to life/personal liberty. If your digital identity isn't safe, is your right to life really protected? Food for thought.
M
Meera T
As a fan, it's upsetting to see his image used in "objectionable" ways. AI should be used for creativity, not for character assassination or cheap marketing. Hope he wins this case. More celebrities should follow suit. 🙏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50