Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs in Victory for American Consumers

The US Supreme Court has ruled that former President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on goods from partner countries violated federal law. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer hailed the decision as a victory for American consumers and the end of a trade war. The 6-3 ruling represents a significant political and economic setback for Trump's signature policy. The decision could also impact ongoing trade negotiations, including a US-India interim agreement.

Key Points: US Supreme Court Rules Trump Tariffs Illegal

  • Supreme Court rules tariffs violated federal law
  • 6-3 decision deals blow to Trump's trade policy
  • Ruling may impact all negotiated trade deals
  • Could bring relief to exporters and consumers
3 min read

"Victory for wallets of every American consumer": Senate Dem leader Schumer on US Supreme Court striking down Trump's tariffs

Supreme Court strikes down Trump-era tariffs in 6-3 ruling, calling it a victory for consumers and a major blow to his trade policy.

"A victory for the wallets of every American consumer. Trump's illegal tariff tax just collapsed. - Chuck Schumer"

Washington DC, February 21

New York's Senator and Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer called the US Supreme Court ruling against Trump's tariffs on Friday a "victory for the wallets of every American consumer." He further called the ruling the "end of trade war".

In a post on X, he said, "A victory for the wallets of every American consumer. Trump's illegal tariff tax just collapsed--He tried to govern by decree and stuck families with the bill. Enough chaos. End the trade war."

The United States' Supreme Court on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on goods from nearly all partner countries violated federal law, US media reported.

As per a report in The Washington Post, the ruling deals a major blow to his signature economic policy and represents a stinging political setback.

CBS News reported that the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 verdict, said that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, does not authorise the President to unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs on nearly every country under a federal emergency powers law, delivering a significant blow to the president's signature economic policy.

The news outlet reported that the vote count was complicated, with various justices joining different parts of the opinion.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the opinion and was joined in part by Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Neil M. Gorsuch, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Justices Gorsuch, Barrett and Kagan filed concurring opinions in the case.

Justice Clarence Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, as did his fellow conservative Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh's dissent was joined by Justice Thomas and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.

US media outlets said that this could mean all trade deals negotiated could face issues with Congress, likely to step in.

Days after the US imposed 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, the United States on August 6 last year imposed a 25% tariff on Indian goods as a punitive measure for continued Russian oil imports.

Under the US-India Interim Trade Agreement, earlier this month, the US agreed to reduce reciprocal duties on Indian goods to 18 per cent. Observers said that with the US apex court's verdict, exporters could see more relief in tariffs.

The observers also said the US apex court judgement could bring new elements in negotiations to finalise the Interim Trade Agreement, which was expected to be signed next month.

"...This was largely baked in by markets, hence we are seeing positive moves in US markets. Indian Nifty is up over 250 points, so being viewed positively. The question is, what Plan B will the Trump administration unleash? Refunding USD 175 bn of customs duties will impact the fiscal deficit massively. Also, many investment linkages are there," Ajay Bagga, banking and market expert, said.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Interesting to see the US Supreme Court check executive overreach. While it benefits us, it's a reminder that strong, independent institutions are crucial for any democracy, including ours. The focus should now be on finalizing that interim trade deal.
R
Rohit P
Nifty up 250 points says it all! Markets are breathing a sigh of relief. But Bagga sir is right, what's the next move? The US fiscal deficit impact is their headache, but we need to be prepared for any new trade barriers they might invent.
S
Sarah B
As someone who follows US-India trade closely, this is a significant development. The punitive tariff for buying Russian oil always felt like an overreach. Hope this leads to more pragmatic and less politically charged trade negotiations.
V
Vikram M
A good ruling, but let's not celebrate too soon. Our negotiators must use this leverage wisely. The goal should be a long-term, balanced deal that protects our interests, not just a quick reduction from 25% to 18%.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, while the court's decision is welcome, calling it an "end of trade war" feels premature. The underlying tensions over market access, IP, and digital taxes remain. This is a battle won, not the war.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50