Bahrain Pushes UN Resolution to Authorize Force in Strait of Hormuz

Bahrain has circulated a draft UN Security Council resolution aimed at authorizing member states to use all necessary means to ensure free navigation in the Strait of Hormuz and counter Iranian threats. The text, framed under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, explicitly condemns Iran's actions as a threat to international peace and security. It calls for immediate cessation of attacks on commercial vessels and allows for independent or multinational naval action. However, the resolution is unlikely to pass due to the veto power held by Russia and China on the Security Council.

Key Points: UN Draft Resolution: Use Force to Secure Strait of Hormuz

  • Draft condemns Iranian threats to shipping
  • Authorizes force under UN Charter Chapter VII
  • Requires quarterly reports to Security Council
  • Faces likely veto from Russia and China
3 min read

"Use all necessary means": Bahrain circulates draft UN resolution to secure Strait of Hormuz

Bahrain circulates UNSC draft authorizing "all necessary means" to counter Iranian threats and ensure freedom of navigation in the vital Strait of Hormuz.

"use all necessary means... to secure transit passage - UN Draft Resolution"

Manama, March 24

In a significant diplomatic escalation against Tehran, Bahrain has circulated a draft United Nations Security Council resolution aimed at authorising member states to "use all necessary means" to curb Iranian threats and ensure free passage of commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, according to a report by The Jerusalem Post.

The text explicitly condemns ongoing threats against commercial shipping, highlighting the severe consequences such actions have on international trade, energy security, and the global economy.

The proposal authorises member states, acting independently or through multinational maritime partnerships, to "use all necessary means" in and around the Strait of Hormuz, including within the territorial waters of coastal states, to ensure free passage and counter attempts to block or disrupt navigation, The Jerusalem Post reported.

The draft states, "We are determining that Iran's actions near and around the Strait of Hormuz, including its recurring threats and attacks on commercial and merchant vessels, and actions impeding the freedom of navigation, constitute a threat to international peace and security."

However, it was unlikely to get through the UNSC, where Russia and China had veto power.

Moving beyond mere condemnation, the resolution is framed as an operational text under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. This legal framework would grant member states the authority to take "concrete action" at sea, marking a departure from previous resolutions that focused solely on diplomatic rebukes.

The Jerusalem Post reported that the proposal calls for the Islamic Republic of Iran to immediately cease all attacks against merchant and commercial vessels, as well as any attempts to "impede lawful transit passage or freedom of navigation" in and around the strategic waterway.

The draft notes, "The Security Council authorizes Member States, acting nationally or through voluntary multinational naval partnerships, for which advance notification has been provided to the Security Council, to use all necessary means, in and around the Strait of Hormuz, including within the territorial waters of littoral states within or bordering the Strait of Hormuz, to secure transit passage and to repress, neutralize, and deter attempts to close, obstruct, or otherwise interfere with international navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, until such time as the Council decides otherwise."

To ensure accountability, the resolution stipulates that any military or maritime actions taken under this mandate must be reported quarterly to the Security Council. As per the details shared by The Jerusalem Post, the draft also expresses a readiness to impose further measures, including "targeted sanctions," against any actors found to be undermining the freedom of navigation.

While the text is expected to undergo various revisions as it is debated among Security Council members, the move signals an increasingly assertive stance by Gulf states as they seek "active measures" to secure the world's most vital energy transit route.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While the intent to secure a critical waterway is understandable, authorizing "all necessary means" is a slippery slope. It could be seen as a blank cheque for military action. Diplomacy should be exhausted first. The veto from Russia and China shows how divided the global response is.
A
Aditya G
Bahrain is taking a bold step, but let's be practical. With Russia and China's veto, this resolution is dead on arrival at the UNSC. It's more of a political statement by the Gulf states to show they are serious. The real question is what happens on the ground if shipping is attacked.
P
Priyanka N
India has excellent relations with both the Gulf nations and Iran. This puts us in a delicate position. Our foreign policy has to walk a tightrope – ensuring energy security while not alienating important partners. A tough diplomatic challenge ahead for MEA.
M
Michael C
The quarterly reporting requirement is a good check and balance. It prevents any single country from acting unilaterally without some oversight. Freedom of navigation is a fundamental principle, but the response must be measured and proportional.
K
Kavya N
If petrol prices shoot up again because of tension in the Gulf, it's the common man in India who will suffer the most. Hope our government is preparing contingency plans. Jai Hind!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50