US Trade Chief Calms Allies After Court Strikes Down Trump Tariff Tool

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has moved to reassure global allies following a Supreme Court decision that invalidated a key legal tool for President Trump's tariffs. He emphasized that while the administration is shifting to other statutory authorities like Section 122, the underlying trade strategy and existing agreements remain intact. Greer confirmed active consultations with partners like the European Union but stated no one has withdrawn from deals. He defended the continuity of the administration's approach, citing ongoing investigations to bridge any gaps left by the court's ruling.

Key Points: US Trade Rep Reassures Allies on Tariffs After Court Ruling

  • Supreme Court struck down key Trump tariff authority
  • Greer assures allies existing deals are safe
  • US pivots to Section 122 and 301 tariffs
  • Strategy remains despite legal shift
  • Global consultations described as "normal"
3 min read

US Trade chief Greer reassures allies amid tariff shift

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer says trade policy "hasn't changed" despite a Supreme Court ruling, pledging continuity with new legal tools.

"The policy hasn't changed, just the tools have changed. - Jamieson Greer"

Washington, Feb 23

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has sought to calm global nerves after the Supreme Court struck down a key plank of President Donald Trump's tariff regime, telling allies and trading partners that existing agreements remain safe and that Washington's trade policy "hasn't changed" despite a shift in legal tools.

In an interview to a top US television channel on Sunday, Greer signalled that while the Trump administration is pivoting from emergency powers to other statutory authorities, the substance of US trade strategy will endure.

"The policy hasn't changed, just the tools have changed," he said, underlining that the White House expects continuity even as it transitions to Section 122 tariffs and prepares additional investigations under Section 301 and other provisions.

Greer confirmed he has been in direct contact with major partners following the apex court's court judgment and President Trump's decision to impose a 15 per cent global tariff under Section 122.

"I spoke with my counterpart from the European Union this weekend," he said.

"I spoke to my counterparts in other countries."

South Korea and the European Union convened emergency meetings with US government officials in Washington.

Greer said such consultations were "totally normal" but insisted that the underlying trade deals were not contingent on the outcome of the litigation.

"The deals were not premised on whether or not the... emergency tariff litigation would rise or fall," he added.

"I've been telling them for a year whether this case, whether we won or lost, we were going to have tariffs. The President's policy was going to continue."

Greer stressed that no US ally had formally withdrawn from trade agreements.

"I haven't heard anyone yet come to me and say, the deal's off," he said.

"They want to see how this plays out. I'm in active conversation with them on it."

While acknowledging that the US administration no longer enjoys "the same flexibility that International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) gave us," Greer said, adding that the Congress has already delegated "enormous tariff-setting authority" to the President under other statutes.

"Congress has already put out statutes allowing the President to impose tariffs," he said.

"We're not going to stop our programme. We'll just use the Congressional authorities they've extended already for now."

On the decision to raise the Section 122 global tariff from 10 per cent to the maximum 15 per cent, Greer said the strategy itself remained intact.

"The strategy didn't change, because the problem remains the same," he added, citing what he described as "a huge, huge unfairness, huge disparity, huge imbalance between the United States and its trading partners".

"Although Section 122 tariffs expire after five months, unless extended," Greer said the US administration expects investigations launched during that period to provide a bridge.

"Yeah, that's one way to put it," he added, when asked whether new probes would "pick up where they left off".

Greer defended President Trump's remarks that foreign interests were involved in efforts to overturn the tariffs, citing foreign companies that participated in litigation.

"It's foreign companies that are benefiting from the tariffs being struck down," he said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Interesting to see the US pivot to different legal tools. The core issue they mention - "unfairness" and "imbalance" - is something we in India can relate to in some trade discussions. Hope our negotiators are watching this closely and learning. The game is all about finding the right legal authority.
A
Arun Y
The reassurance to allies sounds good, but actions matter more. If the strategy is truly the same, then the 15% global tariff hike speaks volumes. This protectionist wave affects everyone. India must strengthen its domestic market and diversify its trade partnerships beyond over-reliance on any single nation.
S
Sarah B
Working for an MNC with a big India presence, this news is critical. Greer's comments about "active conversation" are key. Hope the Indian government is in that loop. A US-EU trade spat can have serious ripple effects on our supply chains and costs here in Bangalore.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, this seems like diplomatic speak to cover up a policy failure in court. The Supreme Court struck it down for a reason. Calling it just a "change of tools" is spin. The administration's approach clearly faced a legal hurdle, and that should be acknowledged. India should take note of this legal resilience.
M
Meera T
The focus should be on fixing the "huge disparity" they talk about, not just finding new ways to impose tariffs. True partnership means addressing root causes. Maybe this is an opportunity for countries like India to push for more equitable trade frameworks. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50