US General Drafts Iran Strike Plans While Navigating Trump Tensions

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen Dan Caine, is quietly drafting military options for a potential strike on Iran while raising internal concerns about the operation's complexity and potential casualties. This occurs alongside a significant US military hardware buildup in the Middle East, the largest since the Iraq invasion. The balancing act unfolds as the US and Iran prepare to resume nuclear negotiations in Geneva, with Tehran expected to present a new proposal. Concurrently, the US has deployed F-22 fighter jets to Israel for the first time for a potential wartime mission, marking deeper military coordination.

Key Points: US General's Tightrope Walk on Iran Military Options

  • Military options drafted for Iran
  • Concerns over scale and US casualties
  • Largest US hardware buildup in Mideast since Iraq
  • Nuclear talks resume amid tensions
  • New F-22 deployment to Israel
2 min read

US top general walks a tightrope on Iran: Report

Top US general quietly prepares military plans for Iran amid nuclear talks and internal Pentagon concerns over scale and potential casualties.

"I don't think a final decision has been made yet - Sen. Dan Sullivan"

Washington, Feb 26

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has been quietly drafting military options for a possible strike on Iran, even as he seeks to avoid direct confrontation with President Donald Trump, according to accounts published in US media.

As chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Gen Dan Caine has been "drafting military options for potentially striking Iran," with a steady stream of top officials from the Army, Navy, and Air Force summoned to his office, CNN reported.

In internal discussions at the Pentagon, Caine has raised concerns about the "scale, complexity and potential for US casualties" if a major operation were launched against Iran, according to the report.

At the same time, he has overseen the "assembling of the largest collection of US military hardware assembled in the Middle East since the invasion of Iraq," CNN said.

The balancing act comes as the United States and Iran prepare to resume nuclear negotiations in Geneva. Tehran is expected to present a new proposal on enrichment, even as Washington amasses forces in the region, The Washington Post reported.

"I don't think a final decision has been made yet," Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) said after being briefed on the situation.

Trump has repeatedly insisted that earlier US strikes had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear programme, though international officials have questioned the extent of the damage, according to the Post.

On the military front, the Wall Street Journal reported that the US has sent F-22 fighter jets to Israel for the first time for a potential wartime mission. The move marks a deeper level of US-Israeli military coordination amid tensions with Tehran.

The F-22 deployment will allow the US to defend Israeli territory and American forces in the Middle East from possible Iranian retaliation, the Journal said.

Meanwhile, lawmakers have also moved to address human rights concerns inside Iran. Senators Dave McCormick and Jacky Rosen introduced the Iran Human Rights, Internet Freedom, and Accountability Act of 2026 to expand internet access and strengthen sanctions against rights abusers.

"The Iran Human Rights, Internet Freedom, and Accountability Act of 2026 builds on America's efforts to stand with the Iranian people against a regime that is economically, militarily, and morally bankrupt," said Senator McCormick.

Senator Rosen said, "The people of Iran have been forced to live under a repressive regime that has used censorship and internet blackouts to weaken efforts by its people to fight back".

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The human rights act part is good. The Iranian people deserve freedom and internet access. But military posturing alongside it sends mixed signals. The world doesn't need another war, especially with oil prices already so volatile. It affects all our economies.
A
Arjun K
General Caine is right to be concerned about US casualties. Iran is not Iraq or Afghanistan. A full-scale conflict would be catastrophic for the entire Middle East and would severely disrupt Indian interests and the diaspora there. Diplomacy is the only way.
S
Sarah B
Reading this from Delhi. The F-22 deployment to Israel is a major escalation. It directly ties the US to any Israeli action. This could easily spiral. India has to walk a careful diplomatic line with both the US and Iran, and this makes it much harder.
V
Vikram M
With respect, I think the article misses the key point for India: Chabahar Port. Any conflict jeopardizes a crucial trade and strategic route for us into Afghanistan and Central Asia, bypassing Pakistan. Our foreign ministry must be working overtime on backchannels.
K
Karthik V
The timing is suspicious. Nuclear talks are about to resume and suddenly there's a huge military buildup reported? It feels like pressure tactics. Hope Iran doesn't walk away from the table. A stable nuclear deal is in everyone's interest, including India's.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50