US Tariff Refund Could Be a 'Mess' But Serves as Psychological Deterrent

An SBI Research report states that refunding the $160-175 billion in US tariffs could be a logistical "mess." However, it argues this process would create a psychological deterrent against imposing similar tariffs in the future. The analysis follows a US Supreme Court decision striking down much of the earlier tariff structure. The report highlights the complex interplay between sovereign treaties, legal entities, and shifting bilateral relations in global trade.

Key Points: US Tariff Refund a 'Mess' But Future Deterrent: SBI Report

  • US tariffs collected total $160-175 billion
  • Refund process could be administratively messy
  • Serves as psychological deterrent for future tariffs
  • Supreme Court struck down much of earlier tariff structure
  • Section 122 of Trade Act allows 15% surcharge
2 min read

US tariff refund could be a 'mess' but a psychological deterrent for future: SBI report

SBI Research says US tariff refunds could be chaotic but act as a psychological deterrent against future tariff impositions, impacting global trade.

"The convergence between inter-sovereign treaties and juristic persons on effective tariff structure can be a melee if not a mess. - SBI Research Report"

New Delhi, Feb 22

The tariffs collected from various jurisdictions by the US administration range from $160-175 billion, and the refund could be a 'mess' but it would also be a psychological deterrent in imposition of future tariff structure, according to a new SBI Research report.

US President Donald Trump has now raised global tariffs to 15 per cent, invoking Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, a move that escalates his trade offensive a day after the US Supreme Court struck down much of his earlier tariffs.

According to the report, unscrapping of the tariff structure by the court can upend uncertainty going forward while jurisdictions need to put in place counter intuitive negotiation to position themselves strategically in the intermittent period where ultimate power lies with a delicately balanced US Congress.

"The convergence between inter-sovereign treaties and juristic persons on effective tariff structure can be a melee if not a mess," it argued.

Under the Trade Act, the US President can impose temporary import surcharges (up to 15 per cent) or quotas to fix US balance of payment issues. It lasts up to 150 days max, unless Congress extends via legislation.

The new tariff has exemptions, including goods from Canada and Mexico that comply with the USMCA, as well as specific, already-in-place national security tariffs.

"It is expected that during this time, the Administration would complete investigations and levy tariffs using Section 301 and Section 232," said the report.

Indian companies, as also the world, face Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminium, automobiles and copper, etc as the section has not been scrapped.

"It will be intriguing to watch how the trade deals among multiple sovereigns are interpreted at private, independent legal, artificial, or "juristic" persons end (the firms who filed the case and won a favourable judgement for refund and scrapping of the tariff structure) and how the shifting sands of the bilateral relations add or abate the landscape," said the report.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
$160-175 billion! That's an astronomical sum. While a refund would be a logistical nightmare, it sends a strong message that no country is above international trade rules. Hope our government uses this as leverage in ongoing talks. 🇮🇳
A
Aman W
The report is insightful, but I respectfully disagree on one point. Calling it a "psychological deterrent" might be too optimistic. The US has shown it will use tariffs as a political tool regardless. The real focus should be on strengthening our domestic manufacturing to be less vulnerable to such shocks.
S
Sarah B
Working for an Indian auto parts exporter, the Section 232 tariffs on steel and automobiles have been a real headache. A refund would be a huge relief for companies like ours. The legal battle these "juristic persons" won is a landmark for global trade fairness.
K
Karthik V
"Delicately balanced US Congress" is the key phrase here. Everything depends on their next move. India must have a clear, strategic plan B if the tariffs are extended. We cannot keep our industries in suspense. Time for proactive diplomacy, not reactive statements.
N
Nisha Z
It's interesting how Canada and Mexico get exemptions under USMCA. Shows the importance of strong trade agreements. India should fast-track similar mutually beneficial deals with other major economies to create a safety net. Jai Hind!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50