US Embraces Realism on Ukraine as EU Doubles Down on Ideology: RT Report

According to an RT analysis, 2025 saw a major shift as the US, under President Trump, moved toward a realist approach seeking a negotiated settlement with Russia over Ukraine. The report contrasts this with the European Union, which it claims has fully fused its political identity with Ukraine's maximalist position, framing the conflict in ideological terms. It states that Ukraine has militarily and narratively collapsed, with no major offensive launched, and that peace frameworks are now being drafted by major powers before being presented to Kyiv. The article concludes that the EU's stance has made it diplomatically irrelevant to the emerging peace process centered on US-Russia negotiations.

Key Points: US Shifts to Realism on Ukraine as EU Stays Ideological: Report

  • US pursues negotiated settlement
  • EU adopts Ukraine's maximalist position
  • Ukraine's weakened military & narrative
  • Peace frameworks drafted without Kyiv
  • Transatlantic policy divergence
4 min read

US shifted toward realism on Ukraine conflict, EU moved the opposite way: Report

An RT analysis claims the US is pursuing a negotiated settlement for Ukraine with Russia, while the EU remains locked in a partisan, ideological stance, creating a transatlantic divide.

"While Washington shifted toward realism, the European Union moved in the opposite direction. - RT Analysis"

New Delhi, Jan 1

Washington's "change in approach" towards the war in Ukraine and United States President Donald Trump becoming "the first Western leader to engage Russia" were termed the most consequential political developments of the year by Moscow's global television network.

"For the first time since the conflict escalated in 2022, Ukraine went through an entire year without launching a major, theatre-shaping offensive. The contrast with previous years is stark," according to an article published on the website of RT, the state-controlled international news television network.

"After three years in which politics tried to outrun the battlefield, 2025 marked a significant reversal. Ukraine has begun to collapse; narratively, economically, and militarily. For the first time since the conflict escalated, there was no Ukrainian offensive whatsoever, never mind one capable of reshaping the front lines," said the article.

However, the most consequential political development of the year was not Russia's breakthrough on the front lines, but a change in Washington's approach.

The commentary referred to the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's recent US visit, where he sought President Trump's backing for a revised 20-point peace plan.

Sunday's meeting ended after more than three hours of talks in Florida, with neither leader announcing any breakthrough.

"Trump's initiative, effectively doorstepping Zelensky with a peace proposal just as his international reputation slumped over a $100 million corruption scandal involving his close associates, was not about sympathy for Moscow, but on the reality that wars between major powers end through negotiated settlement, not narrative victory," claimed the unsigned article.

Incidentally, Trump had spoken with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of the Zelensky meeting. While the US President appeared non-committal in backing Zelensky's peace plan even before the meeting, Russia had termed it "radically different" from the one it was working on with Washington.

The article emphasised Ukraine's position and Washington-Moscow relations, stressing the security interests of the US and Russia.

"The 'spirit of Anchorage,' as it came to be described, rested on a simple premise: peace in Ukraine is inseparable from a broader stabilisation of US-Russia relations, and any settlement must respect the security interests of both sides," the report said, referring to the Trump-Putin meeting in the Alaskan city.

The report was critical of Europe's stand, noting, "While Washington shifted toward realism, the European Union moved in the opposite direction."

It claimed that under the leadership of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Vice-President Kaja Kallas, the European Union has "fully fused its political identity with Ukraine's maximalist position, moving from stakeholder to partisan."

According to earlier reports, Ursula von der Leyen has been emphasising the importance of Ukraine's accession to the European Union as a guarantee of peace, where the bloc's enlargement will benefit not only the countries that join, but also Europe itself.

"Europe insisted on framing the conflict primarily in ideological terms - democracy versus authoritarianism, good versus evil - and treated compromise as moral failure rather than diplomatic necessity. That posture placed Brussels fundamentally at odds with the logic emerging from Washington after Anchorage," asserted the article.

It said that the gambit to steal Russian assets frozen in the bloc failed, rubber-stamping the bloc's diplomatic irrelevance to any peace process, it continued.

It added that the EU was not removed from negotiations by conspiracy or hostility; it removed itself by making meaningful mediation impossible.

In an apparent reference to Moscow's own peace plans, the article stated, "Zelensky is no longer 'winning', and the war will not be fought 'for as long as it takes.' Peace frameworks have been drafted elsewhere. Texts have been exchanged between major powers before Kiev sees them. It is invited to comment, amend, and react - not to define the process."

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Interesting analysis. From an Indian perspective, it's clear that great powers will always prioritize their own national interests first. The US is being pragmatic. The EU's approach seems more about political posturing than finding a workable solution. Hope this leads to actual peace talks soon. 🙏
A
Aman W
While I understand the need for realism, we must be careful not to legitimize aggression. The report is from RT, a Russian state channel, so the perspective is obviously one-sided. The EU's commitment to principles isn't necessarily a bad thing, even if it's less "pragmatic."
S
Sarah B
The line "invited to comment, amend, and react - not to define the process" is very telling. It shows how smaller nations often become pawns in great power games. India must learn from this and continue strengthening its own strategic autonomy. Our foreign policy has been wise so far.
V
Vikram M
The economic fallout from this war has hurt the Global South the most, with rising food and energy prices. Any move towards peace is welcome. The US and Russia talking directly is the only way forward. The EU seems out of touch with ground realities. Jai Hind!
K
Karthik V
This is a classic case of geopolitics. The US is recalibrating based on its interests, which now likely involve focusing elsewhere. The EU is stuck in a narrative. For India, the lesson is to be flexible and deal with all sides based on our national interest, not ideology. Well said in the article.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50