US Senators Push Trump to Secure Pulse Crop Access in India Trade Deal

Two Republican senators have urged President Trump to prioritize securing better market access for American pulse crop producers in ongoing trade talks with India. They represent major pulse-producing states and cite India's high agricultural tariffs as a key barrier. The appeal comes as the US and India work towards finalizing a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement. The senators argue that lowering trade barriers would benefit both American farmers and India's large consumer market for protein-rich pulses.

Key Points: US Senators Urge Trump to Prioritize Pulse Crop Access in India Trade

  • US senators seek pulse crop access in India deal
  • India's high agri tariffs hinder US exports
  • US-India trade negotiations ongoing
  • Deal would benefit US farmers and Indian consumers
2 min read

US Senators call on Trump to prioritize pulse crop market access in India trade talks

Republican senators call on President Trump to secure better market access for US pulse crops in India trade negotiations, citing high tariffs.

"favourable pulse crop provisions - Senators Kevin Cramer and Steve Daines"

Washington DC, January 17

Two Republican senators are urging President Donald Trump to ensure that American pulse crop producers receive better access to the Indian market as part of ongoing trade negotiations between the United States and India.

In a letter sent on January 16, Senators Kevin Cramer, Representative-North Dakota and Steve Daines, Representative-Montana urged President Trump to include "favourable pulse crop provisions" in any future bilateral trade agreement with India. Both senators represent states that are among the largest producers of pulses, such as peas, lentils, and dried beans, in the United States, while India is the world's biggest consumer of these crops.

The letter highlights longstanding concerns among American farmers about India's high agricultural tariffs, which raise the cost of US pulse exports and make them less competitive compared with other suppliers. According to US trade officials, India's average applied tariff on agricultural goods is significantly higher than that of the US, creating barriers for American producers in one of the largest global markets.

According to US Ambassador to India Sergio Gor, the US and India are actively engaged in finalizing a new trade deal. The Trump Administration launched negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with India last year on February 13, and in April, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) finalized its Terms of Reference for a BTA, establishing the roadwork for mutually beneficial, multi-sector negotiations.

USTR found India's average applied tariff rate on agriculture products was 39%, whereas the US applied an average tariff of just 5% on agricultural goods. It also found technical barriers to trade, regulatory barriers, and restrictions on access to the market in certain sectors, including agriculture, have reduced US exports to India.

Cramer and Daines argued that lowering these trade barriers would benefit both American farmers and Indian consumers, given India's massive demand for protein-rich pulses. They also noted that similar outreach was made during President Trump's first term, with the previous letter being personally delivered to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The appeal arrives amid broader US-India trade discussions aimed at finalizing a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement, where agriculture remains a key issue.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
If the quality is good and the price is right, why not? As a consumer, I wouldn't mind more options in the market. But the deal must be truly fair for India, not just one-sided.
A
Aman W
Comparing 39% to 5% tariffs sounds dramatic, but we have to consider the context. Our economy and farming sector are at a different stage of development. A phased approach might be better.
S
Sarah B
Living in India for 5 years now, I've seen how vital pulses are to the daily diet here. While trade is important, food security and sovereignty for a nation of 1.4 billion people is non-negotiable.
V
Vikram M
Let's not forget the other side of the coin. What market access are we getting in the US for our products? IT services, pharmaceuticals, textiles? The deal has to be comprehensive.
K
Karthik V
Honestly, our pulses sometimes have quality and supply issues leading to price volatility. If imports can stabilize prices for dal, the common man would benefit. But our farmers need a strong safety net.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50