US Senators Accuse UBS of Blocking Probe into Credit Suisse's Nazi Ties

US senators have accused UBS of obstructing a congressional investigation into Credit Suisse's historical ties to Nazi clients. The probe, initiated after a tip from the Simon Wiesenthal Centre, identified nearly 100 Nazi-linked accounts, some open until recently. Investigators allege UBS began withholding crucial records after learning of a potential public hearing, preventing a full accounting. Key witnesses testified that access to a small set of disputed documents is vital to determine definitively whether specific Nazis held accounts.

Key Points: UBS Accused of Obstructing Holocaust Banking Investigation

  • Probe into Nazi-linked Swiss bank accounts
  • UBS accused of withholding key records
  • Nearly 100 Nazi accounts identified
  • Investigation revived after UBS takeover
  • Disputed documents could be decisive
4 min read

US Senators accuse UBS of blocking Holocaust truth

US senators allege UBS is withholding records in a probe of Credit Suisse's Nazi-linked accounts, hindering the search for historical truth.

"UBS conduct is absurd and a historic shame that will outlive today's hearing. - Chuck Grassley"

Washington, Feb 4

US senators accused UBS of obstructing a congressional probe into Credit Suisse's Nazi-linked accounts, after investigators said disputed bank records could determine "whether a Nazi had an account or did not have an account."

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley on Tuesday (local time) said lawmakers were examining "new facts and evidence regarding Nazis collaboration with uh, Swiss banks," describing the inquiry as a bipartisan effort to uncover the historical truth that had been "once lost to history."

Grassley said the investigation began after the Simon Wiesenthal Centre notified Credit Suisse in 2020 that it had identified information related to the bank's Nazi-era ties.

He said Credit Suisse initially agreed to investigate and hired former Troubled Asset Relief Program inspector general Neil Barofsky to oversee the review.

"But after the investigation uncovered damaging information, the bank paused its review, limited access to records and terminated Barofsky," Grassley said, calling claims of performance issues "entirely false."

Grassley said the Senate Budget Committee later issued its first subpoena since 1991 to obtain Barofsky's draft report and a forensic auditor's report, which found that Credit Suisse "didn't review and investigate all relevant records regarding its Nazi past and applied excessive scope restrictions to its review." Even so, the probe identified nearly 100 Nazi-linked accounts, with some remaining open until the 1990s and one as recently as 2020.

After UBS acquired Credit Suisse, Grassley said Barofsky was rehired and given resources to revive the investigation. He credited UBS for initially cooperating, but alleged that the bank began withholding records after it learned the Senate might hold a public hearing.

He also criticised UBS for pursuing court action in New York that he said could limit the Wiesenthal Centre's ability to speak about Holocaust-related issues and restrict Barofsky's testimony.

"UBS conduct is absurd and a historic shame that will outlive today's hearing," Grassley said.

Ranking Member Dick Durbin said the hearing came as the living memory of the Holocaust fades, making it vital that events "are not forgotten, are not revised and are not rewritten." He noted that more than six million Jews were killed during the Holocaust and said lawmakers still had a responsibility to reckon with the past.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse said the bipartisan investigation had brought to light "never-before-seen information" about Credit Suisse's role in servicing Nazi clients and accounts central to the Nazi war effort.

He cited findings that included previously undisclosed accounts held by senior Nazi officials and entities involved in escape networks known as "Ratlines."

Testifying, Rabbi Abraham Cooper of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre said Congress had "an unprecedented opportunity to look under the hood of the banking machinery that facilitated genocide." He warned that "silencing researchers, intimidating human rights organisations or restricting historical truth, undermines integrity and weakens confidence."

UBS Americas President Rob Karofsky and UBS Group General Counsel Barbara Levi said the bank had undertaken "unprecedented voluntary work" to uncover historical facts, providing 16.5 million documents, millions of pages of data, and access to archives in multiple countries. Levi said a small set of documents remained disputed because they relate to the 1999 Holocaust litigation settlement and were subject to privilege concerns.

Barofsky told lawmakers that without access to those documents, he could not complete his mandate. "I don't know what's in those documents," he said, adding that even a small number could be decisive in determining whether specific Nazi-linked individuals held accounts.

In his testimony, Barofsky detailed newly uncovered ties between Credit Suisse and Nazi institutions, including accounts linked to the German Foreign Office and SS-related financial networks.

He also described evidence showing Credit Suisse's role as banker and landlord to an Argentine smuggling operation that helped Nazis flee Europe after the war.

Barofsky said his final report is expected by the end of the year and will include further findings. He warned that current disputes could undermine the investigation if not resolved.

Lawmakers repeatedly urged UBS to provide full access to records and allow the investigation to proceed without obstruction. "The Senate will be watching," Grassley said, "and the truth will come out."

The hearing also revisited the 1999 settlement in which Swiss banks agreed to pay $1.25 billion to Holocaust victims and heirs. Witnesses said that while the settlement resolved legal claims, it did not preclude continued historical investigation.

Senators said the goal of the current probe is to establish a complete and transparent historical record on Nazi-linked banking activity, arguing that accountability and truth remain essential decades after the Holocaust.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone who has studied history, this is terrifying. The attempt to silence researchers and restrict historical truth is a tactic we see too often. Full transparency is the only way forward. The world needs to remember the Holocaust to prevent such horrors from happening again.
V
Vikram M
While the actions of the bank are condemnable, I appreciate that the investigation is bipartisan. It shows that some truths transcend politics. The scale of the documentation—16.5 million files—is staggering. Hope they get to the bottom of it. 🙏
R
Rohit P
This makes me think about our own history and the importance of confronting uncomfortable truths. Whether it's colonial-era looting or other historical injustices, transparency is key for healing. Banks worldwide should take note.
P
Priya S
The part about the bank being a "landlord" to help Nazis escape is chilling. It's not just about money; it's about active complicity. UBS cooperating initially and then stopping when a hearing was announced speaks volumes. Shameful.
M
Michael C
A respectful criticism: While the senators' outrage is justified, the 1999 settlement was a massive step. The article says UBS has provided millions of documents. The legal "privilege concerns" over a small set are a complex issue, not necessarily pure obstruction. Due process matters too.
K
Kav

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50