US Defends Maduro Arrest as Law Enforcement, Not War with Venezuela

The Trump administration has characterized the arrest of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro as a targeted law enforcement action against an indicted narco-trafficker, explicitly denying it constitutes a war or invasion. Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized US forces were on the ground only briefly to execute the arrest and have since withdrawn, with the mission relying on court warrants. The administration's focus is now on sustained pressure through sanctions and enforcing an oil "quarantine" using court orders to seize shipments. Officials defended the operation as necessary to prevent Venezuela from becoming a base for adversarial nations and groups, framing it as an act of hemispheric self-defense.

Key Points: US: Maduro Arrest Was Law Enforcement, Not War

  • US rejects 'war' label for Venezuela operation
  • Action framed as anti-narcotics law enforcement
  • Officials stress no US troops remain in Venezuela
  • Pressure to continue via sanctions and maritime enforcement
  • Operation justified as hemispheric self-defense
3 min read

US says Maduro arrest was law enforcement action, not war

US officials state the arrest of Nicolás Maduro was a targeted anti-drug operation, not an act of war or invasion, and defend the action under international law.

"There's not a war... This was a law enforcement operation. - Marco Rubio"

Washington, Jan 5

The Trump administration sought to blunt criticism of its Venezuela operation, arguing that the arrest of Nicolás Maduro was a narrowly targeted law-enforcement action rather than the opening of a new war or military occupation.

Speaking on NBC's Meet the Press, Secretary of State Marco Rubio rejected the suggestion that the United States is now at war with Venezuela. "There's not a war," Rubio said, adding that Washington is "at war against drug trafficking organizations - not at war against Venezuela."

Rubio said the operation was conducted under US legal authority to arrest an indicted narco-trafficker and did not amount to an invasion. "This was not an invasion," he said on NBC. "This was a law enforcement operation."

Appearing separately on ABC's This Week, Rubio said US forces were on the ground only briefly to execute the arrest and then withdrew. He emphasized that the mission relied on court warrants and sanctions enforcement rather than congressional authorization for combat.

Rubio said the administration's focus has now shifted to sustained pressure through sanctions and maritime enforcement. On CBS's Face the Nation, he said the United States is enforcing an oil "quarantine" using court orders to seize sanctioned shipments.

"That leverage remains," Rubio told CBS News, saying the pressure would stay in place until changes occur that serve U.S. interests and benefit Venezuelans.

Rubio pushed back against repeated questions about who is "running" Venezuela. On NBC, he said Washington is not administering the country but shaping outcomes through policy tools.

"What we are running is policy," he said, referring to efforts to stop drug trafficking, dismantle gangs, and end the presence of foreign militant groups.

US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz echoed that message on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures. Waltz said the operation was justified under international law and framed as self-defence.

"This is our hemisphere," Waltz told Fox News. "We are not going to allow it to become a base of operation for adversaries."

Waltz cited alleged ties between Maduro and China, Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah, arguing that decisive action was necessary to protect US security.

Rubio said the administration is not ruling out future steps but stressed that there are no US troops stationed in Venezuela. "We don't have US forces on the ground," he told NBC.

Responding to questions on elections and political transition, Rubio urged realism. "These things take time," he said on CBS. "There's a process."

The administration said it would judge Venezuela's next steps by actions rather than promises, while maintaining pressure until US security concerns are addressed.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The double standards are glaring. If any other country did this on US soil, it would be an act of war. Calling it 'law enforcement' when you send troops into another sovereign nation is just semantics. Hope our Indian diplomats are taking notes on how not to behave with our neighbours. 🙏
R
Rohit P
While I'm no fan of Maduro, this sets a dangerous precedent. What's stopping them from doing something similar elsewhere under the same "narco-trafficker" label? The US seems to be the judge, jury, and executioner for the entire American continent. Sovereignty clearly means little to them.
S
Sarah B
Living in India, I see this from a different angle. The mention of China, Russia, and Iran ties explains a lot. It's less about Venezuela and more about great power competition. The US is trying to clean its backyard before focusing elsewhere. A strategic move, but wrapped in a humanitarian and legal cloak.
V
Vikram M
The oil "quarantine" is the real story here. It's about controlling resources, as always. They arrest the president but say they're not running the country? Then who is? This will only create more instability. Feel for the common Venezuelan people caught in this power play.
M
Michael C
A respectful criticism: While the US action seems high-handed, we must also acknowledge that Maduro's regime has caused immense suffering. The drug trafficking allegations are serious. Sometimes, decisive action is needed against rogue leaders. The international community has failed Venezuela for years.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50