US: Rubio says Iran nuclear talks 'highly technical', may take months
Washington DC, June 2
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday said that negotiations on Iran's nuclear programme, as part of the overall peace talks between the two sides, would be "highly technical" in nature and could take several months to conclude.
Testifying in front of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Rubio indicated that the next phase of discussions would depend on Iran taking specific steps, including reopening the strategic Strait of Hormuz under agreed conditions, and the disposition of the highly enriched uranium.
"Phase 2 is they have to commit to very specific negotiations. On the disposition of the highly enriched uranium that still is buried deep in a mountain somewhere...They have to agree on negotiating severe and long-term limitations and/or cancellation of enrichment activity in their country," Rubio told lawmakers.
Rubio stressed that the complexity of the issues involved would require sustained technical engagement over an extended period.
"Obviously, these are highly technical matters, so I don't think you could work those out in five days. That would require a team of experts to meet over a 30-, 60-, 90-day period and work out the details, but they have to commit to their willingness to do that," Rubio said.
He further stated that Iran would first need to declare the Strait of Hormuz open, ensure it remains free of tolls, and take steps such as removing naval mines and refraining from targeting commercial vessels.
The Secretary of State also clarified that the United States has not offered sanctions relief to Iran in exchange for reopening the strait, adding that any easing of sanctions would be strictly conditional.
Rubio further acknowledged that Iran still possesses a significant number of drones but noted that the relatively low cost of such technology makes it a persistent and difficult security challenge.
"This is a pervasive problem around the world. The economics of it are something we have to solve for, but nonetheless, even [Iran's] drone-building capability has been eroded," Rubio told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Rubio said Iran's so-called "conventional shield" -- referring to its use of missiles and drones to protect its nuclear infrastructure -- has been "substantially eroded" following recent military actions by the US against the Islamic Republic.
He further said that what remains of Iran's naval capabilities has been significantly reduced.
"What's left of Iran's navy is a 'bunch of Boston Whalers with machine guns on them,'" Rubio said.
The US Secretary of State also claimed that the US blockade of Iranian ports was resulting in significant economic losses for Tehran.
The US blockade of Iranian ports, he added, was costing Iran "hundreds of millions" of dollars in lost revenue each day.
The remark comes amid heightened tensions in West Asia as the fragile ceasefire hangs in the balance amid diplomatic engagements between Iran and the US to achieve a complete settlement to the overall conflict, that started on February 28 by the US-Israel strikes against Iran.
— ANI
Reader Comments
"Highly technical" — another way of saying they don't want to commit to any timeline. Meanwhile, Iran keeps enriching uranium. India has always advocated for dialogue and diplomacy, but this seems like the US is just buying time. 😒
I find it ironic that the US speaks so much about maritime security while imposing a blockade on Iranian ports. Isn't that also a form of economic warfare? India's stance on multilateralism and respecting sovereignty should be the way forward. Rubio's rhetoric about "navy being reduced to Boston Whalers" seems like an attempt to downplay the seriousness of the conflict.
The US says they haven't offered sanctions relief for reopening the Strait of Hormuz, but Iran must feel completely cornered. India's Chabahar port project is a great example of engaging with Iran without confrontation. We need more of that pragmatism, not just threats and blockades.
Rubio says Iran's drone capability has been "eroded" but also says it's still a persistent problem. This feels like a no-win situation for everyone involved. The US should have learned from Iraq and Afghanistan that military solutions rarely work. India has always called for restraint and talks — hope that's the path taken here. 🇮🇳
As someone watching from the West, I'm skeptical of these talks. Iran has been playing games for years. But the US approach of demanding everything upfront (like reopening the strait) before even discussing sanctions relief seems unrealistic. India's balanced foreign policy could actually teach both sides a thing or two.