US and Iran Near 14-Point Deal to End War, Axios Reports

US and Iran are reportedly nearing a 14-point memorandum of understanding aimed at ending current hostilities and initiating broader nuclear talks. The proposed deal includes a short-term Iranian pause on uranium enrichment in exchange for US sanctions relief and asset unfreezing. A major sticking point is the duration of the enrichment moratorium, with the US seeking up to 20 years and Iran proposing five. The White House remains cautious, citing potential divisions within Iranian leadership and the risk of a breakdown.

Key Points: US-Iran Near 14-Point Accord to End Conflict

  • US and Iran nearing 14-point MOU for ceasefire
  • Iran to pause enrichment; US to remove sanctions
  • Nuclear enrichment moratorium timeframe is key dispute
  • Talks mediated by Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner
3 min read

US and Iran nearing 14-point memorandum to "end the war", reports Axios

US and Iran reportedly close to a 14-point memorandum of understanding for a ceasefire and nuclear talks, with key points on enrichment and sanctions.

"We don't have to have the actual agreement written in one day. - Marco Rubio"

Washington, DC, May 6

Negotiations between Washington and Tehran are reportedly advancing towards a preliminary accord aimed at halting current hostilities and establishing a framework for expansive nuclear talks. According to an Axios report, which cited several American officials and sources acquainted with the dialogue, the progress is being viewed as the most significant development since the onset of the conflict, though a definitive resolution has not yet been secured.

The reported framework consists of a "one-page, 14-point memorandum of understanding" designed to trigger an immediate ceasefire and launch a "30-day negotiation window" to hammer out a broader settlement.

Under these terms, Iran would reportedly agree to a short-term pause in nuclear enrichment. In exchange, the United States would initiate the removal of sanctions and the unfreezing of billions of dollars in Iranian assets. Furthermore, both nations would work to reduce tensions and ease transit constraints within the Strait of Hormuz.

The report notes that many of the stipulations are "conditional on the outcome of further negotiations," suggesting that the path forward remains fraught with the risk of "renewed conflict or a prolonged period of uncertainty."

American officials indicated to Axios that President Donald Trump's recent choice to de-escalate military activities in the Strait of Hormuz was prompted by these diplomatic inroads.

The diplomacy is being spearheaded by US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, who are reportedly communicating with Tehran both through direct channels and third-party intermediaries.

If formalised, the memorandum would officially "declare an end to the war" and shift the venue for technical discussions to either Islamabad or Geneva.

A primary point of contention remains the timeframe for Iran's "moratorium on uranium enrichment."

While Washington is reportedly advocating for a duration of "up to 20 years," Tehran has suggested "five years." Sources indicate a potential compromise may lie between 12 and 15 years.

The US is further seeking a mechanism to "extend the moratorium if Iran violates the terms."

Following this period, the proposal would allow Iran to "resume limited enrichment to 3.67 percent."

Tehran would also be required to pledge against the pursuit of nuclear weapons.

A US official cited in the report suggested the deal could incorporate a "clause preventing Iran from operating underground nuclear facilities" and mandate "enhanced inspections, including snap checks by UN inspectors."

Another delicate proposal under review involves the potential removal of Iran's "stockpile of highly enriched uranium," with one possibility being the "transfer of the material to the United States."

Despite the momentum, the White House remains wary, believing the Iranian leadership is "divided," which may hinder a final consensus.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio highlighted the technical hurdles, remarking, "We don't have to have the actual agreement written in one day."

He emphasised the need for a solution that is "very clear on the topics they are willing to negotiate on and the extent of the concessions they are willing to make at the front end in order to make it worthwhile."

However, Rubio also voiced scepticism regarding the Iranian leadership's reliability, describing some figures as "insane in the brain."

The upcoming 48 hours are viewed as a turning point as the US awaits Tehran's feedback on several critical points.

While the current outline is seen as a "fragile but significant step toward de-escalation," the report warns that the "risk of breakdown remains high."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Honestly, I'm skeptical. The US has a track record of walking away from agreements - remember the JCPOA withdrawal? Iran might be playing for time while they advance their nuclear program. And Rubio calling Iranian leadership "insane" doesn't inspire confidence in diplomacy. We need consistency, not drama.
V
Vikram M
Good news for India's energy security! Lower tensions mean lower oil prices and stable supply. But why is this being brokered in Islamabad? That's a bit concerning given our relationship with Pakistan. Geneva would have been better. Still, any de-escalation is welcome. 🙏
A
Ananya R
Wait, the US wants to take Iran's enriched uranium and move it to America? That's like asking a neighbour to hand over their fire extinguisher "just in case." Iran has legitimate concerns about security. The West needs to show more empathy. Also, 20-year moratorium is unrealistic - 5 years seems more fair given their sovereignty.
J
James A
As someone who's followed Middle East politics for years, this is a fragile but real opportunity. The key will be the verification mechanism - snap inspections are essential. India has experience with this kind of nuclear diplomacy, maybe we could offer technical expertise to the process? 🇮🇳
R
Rohit P
Uff, these negotiations are always so complicated! But one thing is clear - India needs to be proactive. We should have our own diplomatic channels open with both US and Iran. Our diaspora in the Gulf and our energy needs mean we can't just be spectators. Time for some smart backchannel diplomacy! 💪

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50