Ex-US Analyst Slams Pakistan's "Unusual" Role in Brokering US-Iran Ceasefire

A former U.S. Treasury counterterrorism analyst has questioned the credibility of Pakistan brokering a ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran, labeling the situation as highly unusual. He highlighted that the terms of the agreement remain unclear, with Iran portraying it as a U.S. capitulation involving sanctions relief and reparations, which seems unrealistic. The U.S. side has announced a two-week ceasefire contingent on Iran opening the Strait of Hormuz to free traffic. The comments follow President Donald Trump's announcement of the suspension of attacks, based on conversations with Pakistani leaders.

Key Points: Pakistan Brokers US-Iran Ceasefire, Analyst Calls It "Unusual"

  • Deal brokered by Pakistan called "unusual"
  • Ceasefire terms remain unclear
  • Iran's narrative differs from US's
  • Two-week pause to find permanent solution
  • Strait of Hormuz access is key condition
3 min read

"US-Iran deal brokered by state sponsor of terror unusual": former US Treasury counterterrorism analyst

Former US Treasury analyst questions Pakistan's credibility as broker in US-Iran deal, citing unclear terms and differing narratives from Washington and Tehran.

"A country that is a traditional state sponsor of terrorism... has now intervened to stop a war - Jonathan Schanzer"

Washington DC, April 8

Executive Director at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies and former US Treasury counterterrorism analyst, Jonathan Schanzer has called into question the credibility of Pakistan being part of the ceasefire deal between the United States US and Iran, callig it "unusual" that a "state sponser of terrorism" was brokering a deal between the US and another "rogue proliferator".He further said that the terms of the US-announced ceasefire are still 'unclear', as Iran's narrative is much different from the US.

"I think first we need to understand here that this was a deal that was brokered by Pakistan. This is a very unusual thing that is happening here. A country that is a traditional state sponsor of terrorism and a rogue proliferator has now intervened to stop a war between the United States and a state sponsor of terrorism and a rogue proliferator," he said on Tuesday.

Schanzer further said that Pakistan's aim behind this move by Pakistan was entirely unclear.

"The reasons for Pakistan doing this are entirely unclear to me. I think the terms of this are still somewhat unclear because what the United States is saying differs significantly from what the Iranians are saying. The Iranians are casting this as a full capitulation on the part of the United States. They are saying that the US has agreed to end the sanctions, to leave the region, and to pay reparations. This all seems unrealistic," he said.

Schanzer then said that the US was saying that they would stop firing if Iran opened the Strait of Hormuz. But the question looms- Would Iran allow the free passage of goods through the strait.

"On the US side, they are saying we will stop firing for two weeks if you open the Strait of Hormuz... Does the Islamic Republic allow for the free flow of traffic in the Strait of Hormuz?... We have, potentially, a two-week ceasefire, and during that time, a more permanent solution will need to be derived. But I think during that time period, especially in these early hours and early days, there is still a lot that can go wrong," he said.

The comments come as US President Donald Trump has suspended the "bombing and attack" campaign on Iran, announcing a two-week double-sided ceasefire and saying that the 10-point proposal from Iran was workable.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump, said that ten-point proposal will serve as ground to negotiate for a permanent deal, while reiterating that US has achieved most of its military objectives.

"Based on conversations with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir, of Pakistan, and wherein they requested that I hold off the destructive force being sent tonight to Iran, and subject to the Islamic Republic of Iran agreeing to the COMPLETE, IMMEDIATE, and SAFE OPENING of the Strait of Hormuz, I agree to suspend the bombing and attack of Iran for a period of two weeks. This will be a double-sided CEASEFIRE!" Trump said.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Interesting development. If this leads to peace and stability in the region, especially securing the Strait of Hormuz, it's good for global trade and oil prices. But the analyst's skepticism is valid. Two weeks is not a long time to build trust between these parties. 🤔
A
Arjun K
As an Indian, my first thought is about our national security. Any deal involving Pakistan needs to be watched closely. Their aim is never straightforward. Hope the US administration is being careful and not just looking for a quick exit.
S
Sarah B
While the analyst raises important points, I respectfully disagree with the blanket labelling. Diplomacy often requires engaging with difficult actors. If Pakistan can genuinely help de-escalate a potential war, that's a positive step. The focus should be on the outcome for regional stability.
V
Vikram M
The conflicting narratives from US and Iran are the biggest red flag. Who do we believe? This feels like a temporary patch, not a solution. India must ensure its energy and security interests are not compromised by any backroom deals here.
K
Kavya N
Trump's statement reads like a social media negotiation. It's concerning that such high-stakes geopolitics is being conducted this way. The analyst is right to question the clarity. Hope cooler heads prevail and a proper diplomatic channel takes over. 🙏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50