US FCC Pushes to Bring Call Centers Home, Mandates English Proficiency

The US Federal Communications Commission has voted to begin a formal proceeding aimed at bringing call center jobs back to the United States. A key proposal under consideration would require call center agents to be proficient in American Standard English. The move seeks to address poor customer service, data security risks, and the link between foreign call centers and illegal robocall scams. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr stated that the decades-long trend of offshoring needs to end to provide clearer and more secure support for American consumers.

Key Points: FCC Moves to Onshore Call Centers, Mandate English Skills

  • Encourage onshoring of jobs
  • Mandate English proficiency
  • Combat security & robocall risks
  • Improve customer service & data security
3 min read

US FCC moves to onshore Call Centers, mandate English proficiency

The US FCC votes to start a process encouraging onshoring of call center jobs and requiring agents to be proficient in American Standard English.

"It is time for this offshoring to end. American consumers deserve call centers that speak proficient English... - Chairman Brendan Carr"

New Delhi, March 27

The United States Federal Communications Commission voted on Thursday to initiate a formal proceeding designed to "onshore call center jobs and establish English language proficiency requirements for service agents.

"The Commission will seek comment on proposals that would encourage businesses to bring call center jobs back to the U.S. and improve customer service at existing call centers, including a proposal to require call takers to be proficient in American Standard English," the FCC said in a statement.

This action, according to the Federal Communications Commission release, sought to address a decades-long trend where "nearly 70 percent of U.S. companies outsourcing at least one department".

Beyond service quality, the proposal targeted the security risks associated with offshore operations. "Foreign call centers have also contributed to the onslaught of robocalls facing American households and businesses. Bad actors often leverage the training and infrastructure of legitimate call centers to defraud Americans....The proceeding also explores ways to financially deter illegal robocalls that originate abroad by seeking comment on the targeted use of fees or bonds," it said.

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) focused heavily on the communications industry, which consistently performed poorly in customer satisfaction surveys. "The NPRM launches a proceeding that will seek comment on: ways to encourage and facilitate the onshoring of call centers; steps that can be taken to improve customer service and data security; ways to combat illegal robocall scams that originate inside foreign call centers; and the scope of the FCC's legal authority on these fronts," the FCC stated.

Chairman Brendan Carr emphasized the necessity of these changes, stating, "Americans get frustrated when they call a U.S. business and end up connecting with a call center located abroad."

He explained that foreign centers often meant "confusing service, delayed support, and even security risks." Carr further asserted that "it is time for this offshoring to end. American consumers deserve call centers that speak proficient English, provide clear answers, and are based here at home--not halfway around the world."

He mentioned that some providers already moved toward this model, "We adopt proposals to reshore call center jobs and improve the customer service experience at the ones that remain--including by seeking comment on requiring call center workers to be proficient in American Standard English. I am pleased that many providers already have U.S.-only call centers or are committed to doing so."

Commissioner Olivia Trusty supported the initiative, focusing on the need to maintain a secure digital ecosystem. Trusty stated that "bad actors have kept pace with technology, changing business practices, and other evolutions in the communications marketplace," using sophisticated methods to exploit network vulnerabilities for "unjust enrichment."

She explained that a "trusted, reliable, and secure communications ecosystem is paramount to ensuring that consumers continue to benefit from a dynamic marketplace where innovation and investment can thrive."

Trusty welcomed the focus on identifying and mitigating threats before they impacted consumers, characterizing the move as an important step in building public confidence. The proceeding remained open for comment as the commission evaluated its legal authority to implement these changes across the regulated communications sector.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The security angle about robocalls is valid, but to blame "foreign call centers" as the main source is an oversimplification. Scammers operate from everywhere. This seems more like economic protectionism wrapped in a security blanket. Our industry needs to prepare for potential shifts and upskill in other areas.
R
Rohit P
Honestly, as a consumer, I get it. When I call my bank here and get connected to someone I can barely understand, it's frustrating. Maybe this will push Indian companies to also improve their own customer service quality. We often get the short end of the stick when our own companies outsource support.
S
Sarah B
Working in a Gurgaon call center, this news is worrying. Our entire team works hard to provide top-notch service. The term "American Standard English" is subjective. This could lead to job losses here. Time for our government and industry bodies to engage in dialogue with the US FCC.
V
Vikram M
It's a wake-up call for India's ITES sector. We've ridden the outsourcing wave for decades. Now we need to pivot to higher-value services—AI solutions, analytics, cybersecurity—where we can build products, not just provide cheap labor. The low-cost call center model was always vulnerable.
K
Karthik V
While the job impact is serious, let's see the silver lining. This might force companies to invest more in the Indian domestic market and create better service jobs for Indian consumers. Also, "onshoring" will make US services more expensive, potentially levelling the playing field for local alternatives.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50