US Defends "Maximum Pressure" Sanctions on Iran and Myanmar at Congress Hearing

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent defended the administration's sanctions policy toward Iran and Myanmar before the House Financial Services Committee. He stated the "maximum pressure campaign" on Iran has caused visible economic strain, including a major bank collapse. Lawmakers expressed bipartisan concern over Myanmar's military junta and urged tougher action, citing reports of Iranian jet fuel shipments. The hearing highlighted how financial stability oversight increasingly intersects with global geopolitics and market consequences.

Key Points: US Defends Iran, Myanmar Sanctions Strategy at Congress

  • US defends sanctions-led foreign policy
  • "Maximum pressure" campaign on Iran cited
  • Lawmakers press for tougher action on Myanmar
  • Sanctions aim to target regimes, not civilians
  • Financial stability ties to geopolitics highlighted
2 min read

US defends sanctions on Iran, Myanmar at Congress

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent defends US sanctions policy on Iran and Myanmar before Congress, citing economic pressure as key to national security.

"We saw the fruits of that campaign in December, as the Iranian economy has collapsed. - Scott Bessent"

Washington, Feb 5

The United States has defended its sanctions-led foreign policy toward Iran and Myanmar, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent telling lawmakers that economic pressure remains a central pillar of Washington's national security and global financial stability strategy.

Testifying before the House Financial Services Committee on the Financial Stability Oversight Council's 2025 annual report on Wednesday (local time), Bessent said the Trump administration continues to pursue what he described as a "maximum pressure campaign" against Iran, arguing that the strategy is producing visible economic strain inside the country.

"With respect to Iran, President Trump, upon entering office, instructed the US Treasury to implement a maximum pressure campaign," Bessent said. "We saw the fruits of that campaign in December, as the Iranian economy has collapsed."

Bessent told lawmakers that Iran had suffered a major banking shock late last year, forcing authorities to intervene. "We had a large bank collapse there. The central bank was forced to bail it out, created inflation and the Iranian -- the brave Iranian people have taken to the streets," he said.

Republican lawmakers argued that sanctions were constraining Tehran's ability to fund weapons purchases and overseas activities.

Bessent said Treasury continues to monitor financial flows and trade activity involving sanctioned countries, particularly where third parties may be facilitating evasion.

"We continuously monitor trade between the two countries like that," he said, adding that Iran faces a shortage of dollars to purchase goods or weapons.

Lawmakers also pressed the administration on Myanmar, where bipartisan concern has grown over the military junta's actions and its role in regional instability.

Congressmen cited reports of Iranian jet fuel shipments to Myanmar and urged tougher action against the military regime. Bessent responded that sanctions enforcement tools remained available and said Treasury was working across agencies to apply pressure.

Bessent said sanctions policy was designed to target regimes and illicit networks rather than civilian populations, and that Treasury relied on financial intelligence, monitoring and enforcement to disrupt evasion.

The hearing also highlighted how financial stability oversight increasingly intersects with geopolitics, as lawmakers scrutinise the global consequences of sanctions on energy markets, shipping, banking and capital flows.

Iran and Myanmar remain areas of close attention for global markets, given their roles in regional energy supply, trade routes and cross-border finance.

US sanctions policy has implications for international banking, insurance and trade settlement systems, particularly for countries navigating economic ties alongside strategic relationships.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The situation in Myanmar is heartbreaking. The junta's actions are causing so much suffering. While sanctions might pressure them, we also need to ensure humanitarian aid reaches the people. India has a long border with Myanmar—stability there is crucial for our Northeast as well. Hope for a peaceful resolution soon. 🙏
A
Arjun K
"Maximum pressure" on Iran has direct implications for India. We used to be a major buyer of Iranian oil. These sanctions force us to look elsewhere, impacting our energy costs and foreign policy autonomy. The US strategy often overlooks the collateral damage to partner nations like ours.
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see the financial stability angle. Sanctions are not just foreign policy but shake the global banking and insurance systems. For a country like India with large trade volumes, navigating these US-led restrictions on Iran and Myanmar is a constant operational challenge for our businesses.
V
Vikram M
The report of Iranian fuel going to Myanmar is concerning. It shows how sanctioned states find ways to collaborate, creating more instability. India has stakes in both regions. Our diplomacy needs to be proactive, not just reactive to US moves. Time for a more independent foreign policy stance?
K
Kavya N
While I understand the need for sanctions against rogue regimes, I respectfully disagree with the US Secretary's boast about Iran's economy collapsing. Celebrating the suffering of the Iranian people, who are "brave" as he says, is in poor taste. The goal should be democratic change, not collective punishment. 🇮🇳

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50