US Eyes Pakistan's Minerals, Security Ties Amid Regional Tensions

The United States has identified Pakistan as an important regional partner, focusing on collaboration in critical minerals, trade, and counterterrorism. Assistant Secretary of State Paul Kapur testified that economic and security engagement is being strengthened, combining U.S. financing with private sector expertise. Lawmakers highlighted the high stakes of regional instability, referencing past India-Pakistan military conflicts that risked nuclear escalation. The renewed focus aligns with broader U.S. efforts to diversify supply chains and maintain a balance of power in South Asia.

Key Points: US Deepens Pakistan Ties on Minerals, Security

  • US seeks to develop Pakistan's critical minerals
  • Security & counterterrorism cooperation remains central
  • Trade and energy ties are expanding
  • Regional stability and nuclear risk are key concerns
3 min read

US deepens minerals, security ties with Pakistan

US official calls Pakistan "important partner," outlines cooperation on critical minerals, trade, and counterterrorism amid regional stability concerns.

"Pakistan is another important partner in the region. - Paul Kapur"

Washington, Feb 12

The United States has described Pakistan as "another important partner" in South Asia, outlining cooperation on critical minerals, trade and counterterrorism even as lawmakers highlighted regional tensions and the risks of instability.

Testifying before a House subcommittee hearing on US policy in South and Central Asia on Wednesday (local time), Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Paul Kapur said Washington is working with Islamabad to strengthen economic and security engagement.

"Pakistan is another important partner in the region," Kapur told lawmakers.

"We're working together with Pakistan to realise the potential of its critical mineral resources," he said, describing efforts that combine "US government seed financing with private sector know-how to the benefit of both of our countries."

Kapur said economic ties are expanding. "Our trade, energy, and agriculture are expanding as well," he noted.

He framed the approach within a broader regional strategy, stating, "This will require us to help our partners build strategic capacity, enabling them to integrate into the world economy, preserve their autonomy, and contribute to a free and open region."

Security cooperation, he added, remains central. "Our ongoing counterterrorism cooperation helps Pakistan combat internal security threats while addressing transnational dangers that could harm our partners."

The hearing also revisited Pakistan's long and complex history with militancy. Referencing his academic work, Kapur said: "The point of the book was to look back at Pakistani strategy and discuss how the Pakistanis had interacted with militant and terrorist groups."

He acknowledged the broader challenge of combating extremist networks. "That's one of the challenges of dealing with terrorism, that there are small numbers of people that blend into the population. It's very hard to know," he said.

Lawmakers underscored the high stakes of regional stability. Democratic Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove noted that "India and Pakistan fought their most serious military conflict in decades, risking nuclear escalation in a region of 2 billion people," describing it as "a reminder of the indispensable role of US Diplomacy."

Kapur did not elaborate on the current status of India-Pakistan tensions but emphasised that US engagement across South Asia is designed to prevent destabilising dominance by any single power.

"A hostile power dominating South Asia might exert coercive leverage over the world economy," he said earlier in the hearing.

The renewed US focus on Pakistan's mineral sector comes amid the broader efforts to diversify global supply chains and reduce strategic dependence on China in key sectors.

The testimony suggested that Pakistan continues to occupy a consequential space in Washington's calculations -- as a security partner, a mineral resource hub, and a key actor in a region where instability can carry global repercussions.

US-Pakistan relations have fluctuated over the past two decades, shaped by counterterrorism cooperation, tensions over Afghanistan, and concerns about extremist networks.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The minerals part is interesting. If the US wants to reduce dependence on China, they should look at partnering more with India. We have massive potential and a much more stable investment climate. This feels like a missed opportunity for a stronger US-India economic corridor.
A
Aman W
As an Indian, I understand the US has its own interests. But any partnership that strengthens Pakistan's economy without concrete, verifiable action on dismantling terror infrastructure is problematic for regional peace. The nuclear escalation risk mentioned is very real.
S
Sarah B
Reading this from an international perspective, the US strategy seems clear: diversify supply chains and maintain multiple partners. However, the comment about preventing "destabilising dominance by any single power" is thinly veiled. It's a delicate geopolitical game in South Asia.
K
Karthik V
The part where the official acknowledges the challenge of terrorists blending into the population is key. Until Pakistan's deep state is fully on board with rooting out all terror groups, not just the ones that threaten them, security cooperation will have limited value. Jai Hind.
N
Nikhil C
Honestly, India should just focus on strengthening itself. Our economy, our military, our global partnerships. Let the US engage with whoever they want. Our growth trajectory is independent and strong enough. 💪 This news doesn't change our course.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50