US Cyber and Special Ops Now Central to Modern Warfare

US lawmakers and military leaders testified that cyber and special operations forces are now central to modern warfare, with threats described as "immediate, persistent, and escalating." Senator Roger Wicker noted recent missions marked a "watershed moment" for American military power, while Senator Jack Reed referenced ongoing conflict with Iran. General Joshua Rudd reported over 8,000 cyber missions in 2025, a 25% increase from 2020, with cyber operations now integral to joint military action. The Pentagon is advancing "Cybercom 2.0" to address personnel shortages and maintain technological superiority in artificial intelligence and cyber capabilities.

Key Points: US Cyber, Special Operations at Core of Modern War

  • US cyber and special operations forces are now core to modern warfare
  • Over 8,000 cyber missions conducted in 2025, a 25% increase from 2020
  • Adversaries pre-positioning disruptive capabilities in US critical infrastructure
  • Pentagon advancing "Cybercom 2.0" to address personnel and resource strain
3 min read

US cyber, special Operations, central to modern war

US lawmakers and military leaders warn cyber threats are "immediate, persistent" as cyber and special operations forces become central to modern warfare, with over 8,000 missions in 2025.

"Cyber threats are immediate, persistent, and they are escalating every day. - Senator Roger Wicker"

Washington, April 29

The United States' cyber and special operations forces are now at the core of modern warfare, lawmakers and military leaders said, warning that threats are "immediate, persistent" and escalating as Washington remains engaged in a widening conflict with Iran.

Opening a Senate hearing on the posture of US Special Operations Command and Cyber Command, Senator Roger Wicker said recent missions had marked "a watershed moment for American military power," noting that cyber capabilities were now embedded from the outset of military planning.

"Cyber threats are immediate, persistent, and they are escalating every day," Wicker said, adding that adversaries were targeting critical infrastructure and government networks while advancing their capabilities.

Senator Jack Reed said the hearing came "two months since President Trump launched the war with Iran," with both special operations and cyber forces "deeply engaged in this conflict." He said these units had played "a major role in enabling combat operations, conducting information warfare and providing intelligence support."

Defence officials underscored the evolving nature of warfare, where cyber and physical operations are increasingly fused. Katherine Sutton, Assistant Secretary of Defense for cyber policy, said adversaries were now "pre-positioning disruptive capabilities inside our nation's critical infrastructure."

"This strategic shift from exploitation to effects aims to disrupt military deployments and sow chaos in crisis or conflict," she said, warning that threats like Volt Typhoon represent "a significant and persistent threat to our national security."

Artificial intelligence is accelerating this shift, Sutton added, calling it "a powerful force multiplier" that increases "the speed, scale, and sophistication" of attacks.

General Joshua Rudd, head of Cyber Command, said the US had conducted more than 8,000 cyber missions in 2025, a 25 per cent increase from 2020, with even higher activity expected this year. He stressed that cyber operations are now integral to joint military action, citing operations such as Absolute Resolve and Epic Fury as examples of "cyber and kinetic operations working seamlessly."

Special operations leaders said their forces remain heavily deployed across multiple theatres. Admiral Frank Bradley said the US faces a reality of "simultaneity," managing threats from China, Russia, Iran, terrorism and criminal networks at the same time.

"We do not have the luxury of focusing on only a single goal or mission," Bradley said, adding that demand for special operations forces is higher than ever.

Officials also acknowledged strain on personnel and resources. Reed warned that high operational tempo could be "unsustainable," while Wicker raised concerns that cyber forces are "working overtime" without sufficient capacity to replace them.

To address these gaps, the Pentagon is advancing "Cybercom 2.0," a major overhaul aimed at improving recruitment, training and retention of cyber personnel. Sutton said the initiative seeks to build "domain mastery and specialised skills" across the force.

Lawmakers from both parties stressed the need to maintain technological superiority, particularly in artificial intelligence and advanced cyber capabilities, warning that losing this edge would be "unacceptable."

The hearing also highlighted growing concerns over election security, critical infrastructure vulnerabilities and the increasing role of allies in countering global threats.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

D
Deepika L
While the US talks about 'persistent' threats, I can't help but think about our own neighbours and how they might be pre-positioning capabilities in our critical infrastructure. India needs to wake up to this reality. The Volt Typhoon example is a red flag for all nations. We must secure our power grids, banks, and government networks NOW.
J
James A
Interesting perspective from an American lens. The integration of AI as a 'force multiplier' is both exciting and concerning. With 8,000 cyber missions in a single year, it's clear this is no longer about traditional warfare. I wonder how smaller nations can defend themselves when superpowers are spending billions on such capabilities.
K
Kavya N
One thing that strikes me is the 'unsustainable' operational tempo for US forces. If a superpower like America is struggling with personnel burnout and replacement, imagine the strain on our own defence forces! India needs to prioritise not just technology but also mental health and retention of our cyber warriors. Well-being matters. ✨
R
Rahul R
Honestly, it's sad to see the world moving towards more destructive forms of conflict. Cyber warfare may be 'cleaner' than bombs, but it still harms ordinary citizens — attacks on hospitals, banks, and power grids affect everyone. Instead of escalating, shouldn't nations focus on diplomatic solutions? Just a thought. 🙏
S
Steven W
The article highlights how cyber ops are now 'central' to war planning. But what about the ethical side? When cyber attacks blur the line between military and civilian targets, where do we draw the line? The US talks about threats, but every nation engaging in

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50