US conducts 'self-defence strikes' on Iranian boats, missile sites amid ceasefire negotiations
Washington DC, May 26
The US military carried out "self-defence strikes" targeting Iranian missile launch sites and boats near the Strait of Hormuz amid an ongoing ceasefire between the two countries, CNN reported, citing US Central Command.
"U.S. forces conducted self-defence strikes in southern Iran today to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces," CENTCOM spokesman Timothy Hawkins told CNN in a statement when asked about reports of explosions near the strategic waterway.
He said the targets included missile launch sites and Iranian boats attempting to deploy mines. "US Central Command continues to defend our forces while using restraint during the ongoing ceasefire," Hawkins told CNN.
US and Iranian forces have previously exchanged fire during the ceasefire period. In early May, US forces had struck Iranian military facilities allegedly involved in "unprovoked" missile, drone and small boat attacks on American warships transiting the Strait of Hormuz.
This development comes hours after the US made headway in the ceasefire negotiations with Trump stating that Iran's enriched Uranium (Nuclear dust) will be "turned over" to the US to be destroyed or will be destroyed at an acceptable location.
Trump said this decision will be taken in "conjunction and collaboration" with Iran, signalling Tehran's relaxing its stand as the two countries attempt to reach a peace agreement.
"The Enriched Uranium (Nuclear Dust!) will either be immediately turned over to the United States to be brought home and destroyed or, preferably, in conjunction and coordination with the Islamic Republic of Iran, destroyed in place or, at another acceptable location, with the Atomic Energy Commission, or its equivalent, being witness to this process and event," Trump said in a post Truth Social.
This also confirms the New York Times report that Iran has agreed in principle to give up its stockpile of highly enriched uranium as part of an emerging, US-led framework aimed at halting regional conflict.
This also resolves the key difference between the two countries, as CNN had earlier reported that the disagreements over "language on Iran's nuclear program and the lifting of sanctions" have slowed the finalisation of a broader understanding to finalise the deal between Tehran and Washington.
Earlier, Trump had asserted that any forthcoming accord with Tehran would strictly manifest as a "great and meaningful" deal, or the administration would walk away entirely, as diplomatic talks aimed at officially concluding the conflict continue to stretch out.
Iran had signalled that the parties have arrived at a conclusion over a large number of topics, but pointed to the apprehensions over Washington's frequent changes in positions, complicating the negotiations.
Esmaeil Baqaei, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, said, "It is correct that we have reached conclusions on a large portion of the discussion topics, but to say that this means the signing of an imminent agreement is something no one can claim. The frequent changes in the positions of American officials complicate every negotiation".
— ANI
Reader Comments
"Self-defense strikes" while ceasefire negotiations are ongoing? That's paradoxical at best. If both sides are serious about peace, they need to stop these tit-for-tat attacks. Iran's point about US changing positions frequently is valid - how can you negotiate with someone who keeps shifting goalposts? 🤔
As someone who's watched Middle East politics for decades, this is a familiar dance. Trump's "nuclear dust" rhetoric is classic - but the real question is whether Iran will actually hand over enriched uranium. They've been burned by broken promises before. The devil is in the details, and those details seem very fragile. 👀
India should be using its good offices here. We have strong ties with both the US and Iran. This back-and-forth military action during negotiations is dangerous for everyone, especially for us in the neighborhood. Time for some quiet diplomacy from New Delhi. 🇮🇳🤝
Honestly, "self-defense strikes" while claiming restraint sounds contradictory. If there's a real ceasefire, both sides need to refrain from any offensive action. Iran's mine-laying boats are a legitimate threat to navigation, but strikes should be a last resort, not a negotiating tactic. This is just complicating an already messy situation.
The nuclear deal aspect is interesting. If Iran genuinely gives up enriched uranium, that's a huge win for non-proliferation globally. But Trump's ultimatums don't inspire confidence - "great and meaningful deal or walk away" sounds like a recipe for more conflict. Let's hope cooler heads prevail. ☮️
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.