US Bill Aims to Revoke Citizenship for Fraud, Terror Links, Crimes

A US senator has introduced a bill to expand the government's ability to revoke the citizenship of naturalized Americans who commit serious crimes, engage in large-scale fraud, or have links to terrorist organizations. The legislation, called the SCAM Act, is backed by the White House and cites a major Minnesota welfare fraud case as a key example. It argues such conduct proves an individual lacked good moral character when obtaining citizenship. Critics have previously warned that broadening denaturalization powers could create fear within immigrant communities.

Key Points: US Bill Targets Citizenship Revocation for Crimes, Fraud, Terror

  • Expands grounds for denaturalization
  • Targets fraud, terror links, felonies
  • Backed by White House
  • Cites Minnesota welfare scandal
  • Critics warn of immigrant fear
3 min read

US bill targets citizenship revocation

A new US bill would make it easier to revoke citizenship of naturalized Americans for serious crimes, major fraud, or terrorist organization links.

"American citizenship is a privilege. - Senator Eric Schmitt"

Washington, Jan 20

A US senator has introduced a bill that would make it easier for the administration to revoke the citizenship of naturalised Americans who commit serious crimes, large-scale fraud, or have links to terrorist organisations.

Republican Senator Eric Schmitt of Missouri said the legislation is needed to protect the integrity of American citizenship. The bill is called the Stop Citizenship Abuse and Misrepresentation, or SCAM, Act.

Schmitt said recent fraud cases show that the current system is too weak. He pointed to a major welfare fraud scandal in Minnesota that involved naturalized citizens. He said people who commit serious crimes after taking the oath of citizenship show they never deserved it.

"American citizenship is a privilege," Schmitt said in a statement. He said those who commit felony fraud, serious crimes, or join terrorist groups fail to meet the basic standards of citizenship. He said they should be denaturalised because they never met the legal requirements in the first place.

The SCAM Act would expand the grounds for starting civil denaturalization cases. These would include committing major fraud against federal, state, or local welfare programs, affiliating with a designated foreign terrorist organization, or committing aggravated felonies or espionage.

The bill has the White House's backing. Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy and homeland security adviser, called the Minnesota case "one of the greatest financial scandals in American history." He said immigrants who commit fraud against the United States should be denaturalised and deported.

According to a summary released with the bill, the Minnesota case involved a federally funded children's nutrition program. More than 70 defendants were charged or convicted. Many were naturalised citizens. Prosecutors said at least $250 million was stolen. The summary said the money was used for luxury purchases or sent overseas through remittances.

The legislation argues that such conduct proves a person was not of good moral character at the time of naturalization. It also says those individuals were not attached to the principles of the US Constitution or committed to the good order and happiness of the country.

Under the bill, criminal convictions or admissions within 10 years of naturalization could be treated as strong evidence that citizenship was obtained through concealment or misrepresentation. That could lead to the revocation of citizenship and removal from the country.

Several conservative immigration and policy groups endorsed the proposal. They said the bill would strengthen national security and protect public funds. They argued that denaturalization is a civil process and has long been allowed under US law.

In past debates, critics have warned that expanding denaturalization powers could create fear among immigrant communities. They have said citizenship should not be easily questioned once granted, except in clear cases of fraud.

Under current law, the government must meet a high legal standard to revoke citizenship. It must show that naturalization was illegal or obtained through willful misrepresentation.

Immigration and citizenship remain sensitive political issues in Washington. Proposals like the SCAM Act are expected to draw close attention in the US and abroad, including in countries such as India, which has large immigrant communities in America.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Frankly, I support this. If you commit fraud or serious crimes after getting citizenship, you betray the trust of the country that welcomed you. So many Indians work honestly for years to get that green card and citizenship. One bad apple spoils the bunch. The SCAM Act seems fair for actual criminals.
A
Aman W
This is worrying for the Indian community. Our uncles and aunties sometimes make innocent mistakes with complex welfare forms. Could that be called "major fraud"? The bill says "within 10 years"—that's a long time to live in fear. Citizenship should be stable, not something taken away easily. 🙏
S
Sarah B
From an outside perspective (I'm an American married to an Indian), this feels like political theatre before elections. The Minnesota case is terrible, but making a sweeping law from one example is dangerous. It will create a "second-class citizen" fear among naturalized Americans, including the wonderful Indian doctors and engineers I know.
V
Vikram M
The name itself—"SCAM Act"—is disrespectful and paints all immigrants with the same brush. What about the billions in taxes and innovation Indian immigrants contribute? They focus on one $250M fraud but ignore the trillions generated. This is a bad signal to skilled professionals considering the US. Canada or Australia might look better now.
K
Karthik V
As a principle, yes, citizenship is a privilege. But in India, we don't revoke citizenship for crimes. You serve your sentence. Once an American, always an American—that should be the ideal. This feels like moving the goalpost. What

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50