Iran Demands UNSC Action Against Israeli "Aggression" and US Violations

Iran's ambassador to the UN, Amir Saeid Iravani, has formally accused Israel and the United States of aggression, violating international law, and causing significant civilian casualties and infrastructure damage. In a letter to the UN Secretary-General and Security Council President, he demanded the UNSC fulfill its responsibility to protect peace and launch a formal investigation. The envoy cited specific casualty figures and detailed the destruction of homes, schools, and medical centers since late February. Iran asserts its military responses are acts of legitimate self-defence under the UN Charter.

Key Points: Iran to UN: Hold Israel Accountable for Aggression

  • Iran accuses Israel of violating sovereignty
  • Calls for UNSC investigation under Chapter 7
  • Claims over 1,300 civilians killed
  • Details widespread infrastructure destruction
  • Asserts right to self-defence under UN Charter
3 min read

"UNSC must accept responsibility for protecting international peace": Iran's UN envoy

Iran's UN envoy calls for UNSC to fulfill its duty, accusing Israel and the US of killing civilians and violating international law.

"UNSC must accept its fundamental responsibility towards protecting international peace. - Amir Saeid Iravani"

New York, March 18

The Iranian Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations has formally addressed the global body, asserting that Israel must be held accountable for "ongoing aggression against Iran."

According to state broadcaster Press TV, the envoy's letter further accused the Israeli regime of the "violation of the country's sovereignty and territorial integrity," resulting in the deaths of civilians and the destruction of vital infrastructure.

In a direct communication sent on Tuesday to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the President of the UN Security Council, Amir Saeid Iravani emphasised that the "UNSC must accept its fundamental responsibility towards protecting international peace."

He further called for a formal investigation into "egregious violations of the UN charter and international law by the US and the Israeli regime."

The diplomatic message warned that the "UN Charter must not be weakened by the Israeli regime's normalisation of use of force."

Highlighting the broader regional impact, Iravani noted that such actions represent a dangerous trend of "aggression towards regional countries."

Detailing the legal stance of the Islamic Republic, state broadcaster Press TV reported that the letter reaffirmed Iran's commitment to the UN Charter and international law.

However, it explicitly stated that the nation "continues to exercise its inherent right to protect its sovereignty, national integrity, and civilians against any aggression."

Iravani also addressed the role of neighbouring states, stressing the "international responsibility of governments to prevent their territory to be used for aggression."

The envoy called for "the observance of good neighbourliness" and demanded that these nations prevent the "continued use of their territories against the Islamic Republic of Iran."

The correspondence categorised the military actions as a "brazen violation of international law," insisting that the UN has a "statutory obligation to condemn the aggression categorically and unequivocally."

Iravani urged the Council to hold the "aggressors accountable in accordance with Chapter 7 of the UN Charter."

Providing a grim assessment of the conflict's toll, state broadcaster Press TV cited the letter's claim that since 28 February, the Israeli regime and the US have killed "at least 1,348 civilians," a figure that reportedly includes "233 women and 202 children."

The document further alleged that "19,734 civilian infrastructure" sites have been compromised.

Specific losses cited include the destruction of "16,191 living units, 1,617 commercial buildings, 77 medical centres and pharmacies, and 65 schools."

The current hostilities trace back to late February, when US and Israeli forces launched strikes against 30 targets across Tehran.

These actions led to the death of the former Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, and several other high-ranking Iranian officials.

In the aftermath of these events, Iranian forces have responded with "barrages of missiles and drones" directed at Israeli-occupied territories and US regional installations.

State broadcaster Press TV noted that Tehran views these counter-strikes as "legitimate self-defence."

Invoking "Article 51 of the United Nations Charter," Iranian officials maintained that the country possesses the "legal right to defend itself."

They argued that these measures are necessary responses to "acts of aggression" carried out by the United States and the Israeli regime.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The civilian casualty numbers are heartbreaking, especially the children. No matter the politics, the loss of innocent life is always a tragedy. The UN must step up and protect civilians, that is its primary job. This cycle of violence helps no one.
R
Rohit P
While I understand Iran's stance on sovereignty, we must also be realistic. The region has been a tinderbox for decades. India has always advocated for dialogue and peaceful resolution. More war rhetoric from any side will only destabilize things further, which impacts global oil prices and our economy too.
A
Ananya R
The call for "good neighbourliness" is crucial. Countries in the region must ensure their soil isn't used for attacks on others. This is a basic principle of international relations. Hope diplomacy prevails before this escalates beyond control.
D
David E
Reading this from an Indian perspective, it's clear the UN system is broken. Permanent members with veto power block any action against their allies. How can there be accountability? The Security Council needs urgent reform to reflect today's world, not 1945.
S
Siddharth J
The article mentions the destruction of schools and medical centres. This is unacceptable under any circumstances. International humanitarian law is very clear on protecting such infrastructure. Where is the global outcry? Silence is complicity.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50