Iran Professor Slams "Unnecessary War," Cites 2,000 Civilian Deaths in US Strikes

Iranian academic Foad Izadi condemns the ongoing West Asia conflict as an "unnecessary war," stating over 2,000 civilians have been killed. He alleges the war was driven by Israeli pressure on Washington, citing a former US official's resignation letter. Izadi defends Iran's retaliatory strikes on US bases as legitimate but notes attacks on oil facilities only began after Iranian sites were targeted. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has stated the US is not currently seeking a ceasefire as it nears its military objectives.

Key Points: Iran Professor Calls West Asia Conflict an "Unnecessary War"

  • Over 2,000 civilians killed
  • Diplomatic solution was available
  • War driven by Israeli pressure
  • Iran's retaliation called legitimate
  • US not seeking ceasefire
3 min read

"Unnecessary war, Iran not a threat to US": Iranian professor on West Asia conflict

Iranian academic Foad Izadi says over 2,000 civilians killed, claims diplomatic solution was available and war was driven by Israeli pressure.

"This was an unnecessary war. Iran was not a threat to the United States. - Foad Izadi"

Tehran, March 21

As the conflict in West Asia enters its fourth week, Iranian academic Foad Izadi said more than 2,000 civilians have been killed in US-Israeli strikes and called the escalation an "unnecessary war" despite a diplomatic solution being available.

Speaking to ANI, Izadi, an Associate Professor at the University of Tehran, alleged that civilians were among the worst affected in the initial phase of the attacks.

"We have lost over 2,000 civilians, including 165 little girls, when their school was hit by American Tomahawk missiles on the first day of the illegal attacks. A diplomatic solution was available... This was an unnecessary war. Iran was not a threat to the United States," he said.

Izadi also referred to remarks by former US official Joe Kent, suggesting that Israeli pressure influenced Washington's decision-making.

"You don't have to take an Iranian professor's analysis; you can just read Joe Kent's resignation letter. He was very high-ranking Trump administration official who is saying that this is due to Israeli pressure. Israel, in order to dominate this part of the world, has been successful in using American soldiers to fight a war with Iran and it's causing a lot of difficulties for Iran," Izadi said.

Kent had earlier stated that Israel played a central role in the escalation. "The Israelis drove the decision to take this action, which we knew would set off a series of events because the Iranians would retaliate," he said during an appearance on the Tucker Carlson show.

On Iran's retaliatory strikes, Izadi described attacks on US bases in the Gulf as legitimate, claiming they were being used to launch operations against Iran.

"Initially, Iran just hit US military bases, which are legitimate military targets. The US is using these bases to attack Iran... Iran avoided hitting oil facilities until the other side started hitting Iranian oil facilities," he said, referring to strikes on the South Pars facility.

He added that attacks on energy infrastructure came only after Iranian sites were targeted. "Oil refineries are not normally legitimate military targets, but when they hit our side, then Iran has no other option but to do the same to the other side," Izadi told ANI.

Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Washington is not seeking a ceasefire at this stage of the conflict.

"We can have dialogue, but I don't want to do a ceasefire. You don't do a ceasefire when you're literally obliterating the other side... we're not looking to do that," Trump said outside the White House before departing for Florida.

Later, He also said that the United States is nearing its military objectives in the region, particularly in relation to Iran, and indicated that operations could "wind down" once those goals are achieved.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
It's a complex geopolitical situation, but the loss of innocent life is always a tragedy. The mention of the former US official's resignation letter is very telling. External pressure influencing superpower decisions is a dangerous precedent for global stability.
A
Aditya G
While the civilian casualties are tragic, we must also remember Iran's own actions in the region. It's never one-sided. However, Trump saying "we're not seeking a ceasefire" when civilians are dying is a very hard stance. Where is the humanity?
P
Priya S
As an Indian, this worries me deeply. Any major conflict in West Asia directly impacts our energy security and the livelihood of millions of our citizens working in the Gulf. We need peace, not escalation. Our government should push for dialogue.
M
Michael C
The professor makes valid points, but presenting only one side's narrative. The article lacks the US/Israeli justification for the strikes. A balanced report would help readers understand the full context, not just the Iranian perspective.
K
Kavya N
"Unnecessary war" – these words will haunt us. When will world leaders learn? The cycle of retaliation he describes (hitting oil facilities after yours are hit) is exactly how things spiral out of control. So much suffering for ordinary people on all sides.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50