Doctors Challenge NEET-PG Cut-Off Slash in Supreme Court, Cite Patient Safety

The United Doctors Front has filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Supreme Court challenging a drastic reduction in qualifying cut-off percentiles for NEET-PG 2025-26. The petition argues that allowing candidates with very low or negative scores to qualify threatens patient safety and violates constitutional principles. Simultaneously, the Federation of Resident Doctors' Associations has written to Union Health Minister JP Nadda, urging a withdrawal of the decision, calling it arbitrary and damaging to the profession's credibility. The matter is expected to be listed in the Supreme Court shortly.

Key Points: Supreme Court PIL Challenges Drastic NEET-PG 2025 Qualifying Marks Cut

  • PIL filed in Supreme Court
  • Challenges NBEMS notice slashing cut-offs
  • Warns of threat to patient safety & merit
  • FORDA also urges Health Minister to withdraw decision
3 min read

United Doctors Front files PIL in Supreme Court challenging reduced qualifying marks for NEET-PG 2025-26

Doctors' group files PIL in SC against NBEMS for reducing NEET-PG 2025-26 qualifying percentiles, warning of risk to medical standards and patient safety.

"This unprecedented move undermines the sanctity of a merit-based selection process - FORDA Letter"

New Delhi, January 16

Dr. Lakshya Mittal, President of the United Doctors Front, along with others, approached the Supreme Court of India by filing a Public Interest Litigation challenging the arbitrary and unprecedented reduction of qualifying cut-off percentiles for NEET-PG 2025-26, including zero and negative scores.

The PIL, registered as Diary No. 3085/2026, has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India through Advocate Satyam Singh Rajput, along with Advocate Adarsh Singh and Advocate-on-Record Neema. The petition challenges the impugned Notice dated 13.01.2026 issued by the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS), which has drastically diluted the minimum qualifying standards for postgraduate medical admissions.

The petition led by Dr. Lakshya Mittal and others, in the larger public interest, highlights that allowing candidates with abnormally low or negative scores to qualify for postgraduate medical training poses a serious threat to patient safety, public health, and the integrity of the medical profession. It contends that the impugned decision is arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The PIL further submits that such dilution of merit is contrary to settled judicial principles and violates the statutory mandate under the National Medical Commission Act, 2019, which obligates regulatory bodies to maintain minimum standards in medical education. The petition seeks appropriate directions from the Hon'ble Supreme Court, including quashing of the impugned NBEMS notification and issuance of directions to restore and protect minimum qualifying standards in postgraduate medical education. The matter has been recently filed and is likely to be listed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the coming days.

Meanwhile, on Wrdnesday, the Federation of Resident Doctors' Associations (FORDA) urged the Union Health Minister, JP Nadda, to withdraw the National Board of Examinations' (NBE) decision to "drastically slash" the cut-off scores for NEET PG 2025.In a letter to the Health Minister, FORDA claimed that the move undermines the merit-based selection process and poses a "grave threat" to the credibility of the medical profession.

The doctors' association asked the Centre to constitute a high-level committee comprising the National Medical Commission (NMC), NBE, and resident doctor representatives to review the cut-off policies.

The letter read, "The Federation of Resident Doctors' Associations (FORDA) writes to you with profound dismay and disappointment regarding the National Board of Examinations' (NBE) recent decision to drastically slash the qualifying cut-off scores for NEET PG 2025. This unprecedented move undermines the sanctity of a merit-based selection process, devalues the rigorous preparation of lakhs of aspiring doctors, and poses a grave threat to the credibility of the medical profession in the eyes of the common public."

"NEET PG ensures only competent candidates enter specialised training through merit-based standards. Aspirants sacrificed years to meet past high cutoffs, yet NBE's arbitrary reduction without justification or consultation compromises merit, demoralises toppers, and risks subpar candidates affecting patient care," FORDA added.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone who has worked with medical systems in multiple countries, this is shocking. Diluting entry standards for specialized training is a direct threat to patient safety. FORDA and UDF are right to challenge this.
V
Vikram M
I understand there might be a shortage of PG seats, but the solution is to increase seats and colleges, not lower the bar. What message does this send to the lakhs of students who burnt the midnight oil? Their hard work is being insulted.
R
Rohit P
While I agree standards must be high, I have a slightly different take. Maybe the exam pattern was flawed this year? A high-level committee to review is a good idea by FORDA. Let's not jump to conclusions before a proper review.
P
Priya S
This is terrifying for patients. We go to doctors with trust. If the basic qualifying criteria itself is compromised, where do we go? Full support to the PIL. Hope SC takes it up urgently. 🙏
K
Karthik V
NBEMS needs to explain the rationale behind this decision publicly. Was it just to fill seats? Medical education cannot be about filling quotas or seats, it's about creating competent life-savers. Shameful move.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50