NewKerala.com

UN Agencies Demand Israel Reverse Ban on Gaza Aid Groups Amid Crisis

Multiple UN agencies have issued a joint statement urgently calling on Israel to revoke its planned ban on international aid organizations operating in Gaza and the West Bank. The agencies warn the ban would undermine fragile ceasefire progress and have devastating consequences for vulnerable populations, particularly as winter deepens suffering and acute food insecurity persists. They emphasize that humanitarian access is a legal obligation under international law, not a negotiable political matter. The ban, reportedly set for 2026 over registration disputes, would affect groups providing nearly $1 billion in annual assistance.

Key Points: UN Urges Israel to Revoke Ban on Gaza Aid Groups | Humanitarian Crisis

  • Ban threatens $1B in annual aid
  • Violates international humanitarian law
  • Worsens winter suffering & food insecurity
  • Undermines ceasefire progress
2 min read

UN humanitarian agencies urge Israel to revoke 'ban' on aid groups

UN humanitarian agencies warn Israel's ban on aid organizations in Gaza and West Bank violates international law and will have devastating consequences for civilians.

"Humanitarian access is neither optional nor subject to conditions or political considerations. - UN Joint Statement"

United Nations, Jan 1

Multiple United Nations humanitarian agencies and international organisations jointly issued a statement, calling on Israel to revoke its ban on the operations of international aid organisations in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

The statement, issued on Wednesday (local time), said that international aid organisations play a central role in humanitarian operations in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, providing nearly one billion US dollars in assistance annually.

It noted that in Gaza, with winter worsening families' suffering, high acute food insecurity continuing, and the need for life-saving aid remaining critical, banning aid groups could undermine the fragile progress achieved during the ceasefire and have devastating consequences for vulnerable children, women, and men.

The statement emphasised that humanitarian access is neither optional nor subject to conditions or political considerations, and that it constitutes a legal obligation under international humanitarian law as well as a fundamental requirement for the protection of human rights, reports Xinhua news agency.

Signatories to the statement include Tom Fletcher, UN under-secretary-general for humanitarian affairs and emergency relief coordinator; Qu Dongyu, director-general of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization; Amy E. Pope, director-general of the International Organization for Migration; Volker Turk, UN high commissioner for human rights; Alexander De Croo, administrator of the UN Development Programme; Catherine Russell, executive director of the UN Children's Fund; Sima Bahous, UN under-secretary-general and executive director of UN Women; and Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization, among others.

According to media reports, Israel plans to ban dozens of international aid organisations from operating in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank starting January 1, 2026, citing their failure to comply with Israel's registration requirements.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Arjun K
While the humanitarian crisis is undeniable, Israel citing registration requirements is a point to note. Aid must reach those in need, but transparency and compliance with host nation laws are also important for long-term operations. A balanced approach is needed.
R
Rohit P
One billion dollars in aid annually is a massive amount. Where does all this money actually go? There needs to be accountability on all sides. Banning everyone seems extreme, but maybe some oversight was lacking. 🤔
S
Sarah B
The list of signatories is impressive – from WHO to UNICEF. When so many top UN agencies unite like this, it shows how serious the situation is. This ban in 2026 will have devastating consequences if not revoked. The world cannot look away.
V
Vikram M
As an Indian, we know the value of humanitarian aid during crises. This sets a dangerous precedent. If a nation can block life-saving aid on procedural grounds, what stops others from doing the same in future conflicts? International law must be upheld.
K
Kavya N
"Humanitarian access is neither optional nor subject to conditions" – this line from the statement says it all. It's 2024, and we're still debating whether to feed starving people? Shameful. My prayers are with the innocent civilians caught in this.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50