Trump Weighs Iran Strike as China, Russia Hold Back on Military Aid

US President Donald Trump is considering military options against Iran, with targets ranging from Revolutionary Guard Corps headquarters to nuclear facilities. Despite recent naval drills, Iran's key partners, China and Russia, appear unwilling to provide direct military assistance in a conflict with the US. Diplomats from Washington and Tehran are set for crucial talks in Geneva to avert war, as Iran insists on its right to nuclear fuel. Any escalation threatens the Strait of Hormuz, a vital chokepoint for global oil shipments that impacts countries like India.

Key Points: US Weighs Iran Strike; Russia, China Reluctant to Assist

  • US weighs military strike on Iran
  • China, Russia reluctant to offer direct military aid
  • Diplomacy enters critical phase in Geneva
  • Any conflict risks global oil supply through Strait of Hormuz
3 min read

Trump weighs strike as Iran allies hold back

Trump considers military options against Iran as diplomacy reaches a critical phase. Key allies China and Russia show reluctance to offer direct military backing.

"They're not going to sacrifice their own interests for the Iranian regime. - Danny Citrinowicz"

Washington, Feb 23

US President Donald Trump is weighing military options against Iran as diplomacy enters what officials describe as a last-ditch phase, even as Tehran's closest partners - China and Russia - appear reluctant to offer direct military backing in any conflict with the United States.

According to a report in The Wall Street Journal, Iran has sought for years to build closer military ties with Beijing and Moscow. But its powerful friends are "proving reluctant to step forward" as the regime faces what the paper described as the "most acute US threat to its survival in decades."

Russia and Iran conducted small-scale naval drills in the Gulf of Oman this past week. An exercise involving Chinese ships is also planned in the Strait of Hormuz, Iranian state media reported. Yet analysts told the Journal that Beijing and Moscow have shown little willingness to provide direct military assistance if Trump orders an attack on Iran.

"They're not going to sacrifice their own interests for the Iranian regime," Danny Citrinowicz, a former Israeli military intelligence official, was quoted as saying. "They are hoping the regime will not be toppled, but they are definitely not going to counter the US militarily."

At the same time, The New York Times reported that Trump has told advisers that if diplomacy or any initial targeted U.S. attack does not lead Iran to give up its nuclear programme, he would consider a much larger assault intended to drive the country's leaders from power.

Negotiators from Washington and Tehran are scheduled to meet in Geneva for talks aimed at avoiding military conflict. But Trump has been weighing options for US action if negotiations fail.

Targets under consideration range from the headquarters of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to nuclear and ballistic missile facilities, the Times reported.

Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, insisted in a television interview that the country was not ready to give up what he called its "right" to make nuclear fuel under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.

Meanwhile, Senator Jeff Merkley warned against unilateral military action. "Any decision to launch military action without congressional authorization would violate the Constitution, undermine ongoing diplomatic efforts, and risk putting American troops and innocent civilians in the crossfire," he said in a statement.

Merkley added, "Only Congress has the constitutional authority to declare war."

In a separate interview cited by the New York Post, special presidential envoy Steve Witkoff said Iran could be "a week away" from having "industrial-grade bomb-making material," intensifying pressure on the White House to act.

For India, any escalation in the Strait of Hormuz carries immediate consequences. Around a fifth of the world's oil supply passes through the narrow waterway. Disruption would likely affect global crude prices and shipping routes critical to India's energy security.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
It's naive to think China or Russia will fight America for Iran. They have their own economies to protect. This shows how isolated Iran really is on the world stage. Diplomacy is the only way forward, for everyone's sake.
P
Priyanka N
As an Indian, my first thought is for the 8 million+ strong Indian diaspora in the Gulf. Any war will put them in immediate danger. Our evacuation plans from the region must be ready. Hope cooler heads prevail. 🙏
A
Arun Y
The Senator is right. The US President cannot just start a war without Congress. This unilateral approach sets a dangerous precedent for international relations. Every country, big or small, should follow their own constitutional processes.
K
Karthik V
While the nuclear issue is serious, a large-scale assault to change the regime is a terrible idea. Look at Iraq and Libya. It creates a power vacuum and decades of chaos. India should use its good relations with both Iran and the US to advocate for de-escalation.
M
Michael C
Respectfully, I think the article downplays the real threat. If Iran is "a week away" from bomb-grade material, that's a global security red line. The international community's diplomacy has failed for years. Sometimes tough action is the only language dictators understand.
S
Shreya B

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50