Trump Eyes New Security Tariffs on Batteries, Chemicals After Court Ruling

US President Donald Trump is considering new national security tariffs targeting industries like large-scale batteries, industrial chemicals, and telecom equipment. The measures would be issued under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, separate from a proposed global tariff. This comes after the Supreme Court struck down most of Trump's second-term tariffs issued under a different authority. The potential tariffs could affect Indian exports in metals and chemicals, even as the two nations work to stabilize trade relations.

Key Points: Trump Considers New National Security Tariffs on Key Industries

  • New tariffs target batteries & chemicals
  • Use of Section 232 authority
  • Separate from proposed global tariff
  • Supreme Court struck down other levies
  • Could impact Indian exports
2 min read

Trump weighs new security tariffs: US media

US may impose fresh Section 232 tariffs on batteries, chemicals, and telecom gear after Supreme Court strikes down other Trump-era levies.

"Safeguarding America's national and economic security remains a top priority for President Trump - White House spokesman Kush Desai"

Washington, Feb 24

US President Donald Trump is considering fresh national security tariffs on a half-dozen industries after the Supreme Court struck down many of his second-term levies, a media report said.

According to a Wall Street Journal report, the proposed measures could target sectors including large-scale batteries, cast iron and iron fittings, plastic piping, industrial chemicals, and power grid and telecom equipment.

The tariffs would be issued under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows the president to impose duties on national security grounds.

They would be separate from a new global 15 per cent tariff that Trump has proposed to keep in place for five months, the financial daily reported.

Products already tariffed under Section 232 have so far been exempt from other second-term levies. Trump has previously used the provision to impose tariffs on steel, aluminium, copper, cars, trucks, and auto parts.

It remains unclear when new investigations by the Commerce Department would be announced and when any tariffs would take effect. Section 232 requires lengthy probes, though once imposed, duties can be altered unilaterally.

"Safeguarding America's national and economic security remains a top priority for President Trump, and the Administration remains committed to using every lawful authority to deliver," White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement.

The Supreme Court voted 6-3 to strike down most of Trump's second-term tariffs issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The ruling did not address Section 232 tariffs, which have faced fewer legal challenges, the daily said.

Trade policy under Trump has repeatedly drawn scrutiny from US courts and trading partners. His earlier tariffs on steel and aluminium triggered retaliatory measures from several countries, including India.

For India, any fresh US national security tariffs could affect exports in metals, chemicals and components tied to global supply chains. New Delhi and Washington have in recent years sought to stabilise trade ties even as tariff disputes linger.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Our government needs to be proactive this time. Last time with steel tariffs, we were caught off guard. We should start dialogues with US trade officials immediately and also explore other markets. Atmanirbhar Bharat is good, but we still need exports for growth.
R
Rohit P
Trump's trade policy is so unpredictable. One day he's talking about friendship, next day new tariffs. It makes long-term business planning impossible for Indian companies involved in exports. Hope our trade negotiators have a solid backup plan.
S
Sarah B
While I understand the need for national security, using it as a blanket reason for tariffs on common industrial goods seems like an overreach. It hurts partnerships with allies like India. There has to be a more balanced approach.
K
Karthik V
Power grid and telecom equipment? That's a direct hit on some of our growing sectors. This is a wake-up call to further diversify our export destinations and reduce over-reliance on any single market, no matter how big.
M
Michael C
The Supreme Court striking down some tariffs is a good check on executive power. But Section 232 seems like a loophole they're planning to use now. The "national security" justification is becoming a catch-all for protectionism. Not a fan of this move.
N
Neha E

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50