Trump says US-Saudi nuclear deal conditional on country joining Abraham Accords
Washington, DC, July 23
US President Donald Trump has made a bilateral civil nuclear arrangement with Saudi Arabia conditional on Riyadh formally entering the Abraham Accords.
In a social media post on Truth Social on Thursday, Trump clarified that the proposed cooperation framework would be restricted strictly to non-military nuclear applications, explicitly ruling out domestic uranium enrichment under the arrangement.
"The Civil Nuclear Deal... will be approved, but is totally subject to Saudi Arabia joining the very respected and successful Abraham Accords," Trump wrote.
"The United States is not opposed to Civil (Non-Enriched) Nuclear Facilities," he added.
The President's intervention came twenty-four hours after American and Saudi officials announced the breakthrough energy agreement.
Signed by US Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, the bilateral accord has been submitted for legislative review in the US Congress.
By linking the two issues, Trump has tied the civil energy partnership to a long-standing point of friction in Middle Eastern diplomacy.
Riyadh has repeatedly affirmed that formal diplomatic recognition of Israel remains contingent on a clear and credible roadmap towards an independent Palestinian state.
Despite persistent diplomatic pushes from Washington to expand the scope of the "Abraham Accords", Saudi officials have maintained an unaltered stance on Palestinian statehood.
Negotiations over a bilateral civil nuclear framework between Washington and Riyadh have spanned successive American administrations, though previous efforts hit impasses over non-proliferation stipulations.
Unlike earlier iterations evaluated under former US President Joe Biden, the current draft does not obligate Saudi Arabia to sign the International Atomic Energy Agency's Additional Protocol, which grants inspectors short-notice access to undeclared sites.
The White House maintains that the accord strictly adheres to the US Atomic Energy Act and incorporates robust non-proliferation controls.
Saudi authorities have similarly stated that the alliance will accelerate national energy diversification while upholding international safety standards.
The bilateral treaty, structured as a "123 Agreement", aims to enable the construction of AP1000 nuclear reactors utilising American technology across the kingdom.
The pact is now undergoing a 90-session-day review period in the US Congress and will automatically take effect unless blocked by legislative action.
However, the arrangement has drawn criticism from several Democratic lawmakers, who warn that granting advanced nuclear technology to Riyadh risks triggering broader regional proliferation and an arms race in West Asia.
The "Abraham Accords" are a series of US-brokered diplomatic pacts launched in 2020 that established formal political, economic, and security ties between Israel and several Arab nations, including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan.
— ANI
Reader Comments
Saudi Arabia is being very cautious — they want a Palestinian state before normalizing with Israel. I respect that principled stand. India has historically supported Palestine, and it's good to see consistency from Riyadh. But this nuclear deal could change the power dynamics in West Asia completely. 🕊️
As someone who follows global energy politics, this is a masterstroke by Trump. Linking nuclear cooperation to the Abraham Accords forces Saudi Arabia to make a choice. But from a non-proliferation perspective, I'm worried — without IAEA Additional Protocol oversight, how do we ensure enrichment isn't happening secretly? That's a genuine concern.
The Democrats are right to be sceptical. Giving advanced nuclear tech without full inspection rights is like handing a match to someone in a fireworks factory. West Asia is already volatile — this could trigger a nuclear arms race with Iran. India should watch this closely and maybe reconsider its own nuclear commerce policies. 🚨
I'm from the UK and this feels like a high-stakes gamble. Saudi Arabia wants nuclear energy for its Vision 2030, but the enrichment issue is a red flag. Trump's condition is clever — it makes Saudi choose between technology and its Palestinian stance. But is peace in the Middle East worth risking nuclear proliferation? Tough call.
Interesting that the US Congress has 90 days to block this. That's a solid democratic check. But I wonder if India would ever accept such conditions for its nuclear deals? We've always insisted on full civil nuclear cooperation without strings attached. This sets a precedent that other nations might follow — for better or worse.