Trump Eyes Iran's Oil Hub: "Maybe We Take Kharg Island, Maybe We Don't"

US President Donald Trump has stated that seizing Iranian oil, potentially by taking control of Kharg Island, is his "favourite" option. He compared the potential move to US actions in Venezuela and downplayed the island's defenses. The remarks come amid a significant US military buildup in the region, with thousands of additional troops being deployed. Despite the threats, Trump noted that indirect negotiations with Iran are making progress.

Key Points: Trump Says US Could Seize Iran's Kharg Island for Oil

  • Trump suggests seizing Iran's key oil export hub
  • US military buildup continues in the Middle East
  • Indirect talks via Pakistan are reportedly progressing
  • Oil prices have surged following US-Israel attacks on Iran
2 min read

Trump says US could take Iran's Kharg Island

President Trump suggests the US could take Iran's Kharg Island to control its oil exports, escalating tensions amid Middle East military buildup.

"To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran. - Donald Trump"

Washington, March 30

US President Donald Trump said that he wants to "take the oil in Iran" and could seize Kharg Island, the country's oil export hub.

In an interview with the Financial Times, Trump said, "To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran," comparing the US move to Venezuela, where Washington intends to control the oil industry "indefinitely" after it forcibly seized President Nicolas Maduro in January, Xinhua news agency reported.

Taking Iranian oil would involve seizing Kharg Island, through which over 90 per cent of Iran's oil is exported, the Financial Times reported, warning that such "an assault" risks raising casualties and prolonging the war.

"Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don't. We have a lot of options," it quoted Trump as saying. "It would also mean we had to be there for a while."

He added that he believed Iran had little or no defence on the island. "We could take it very easily," he said.

Trump's remarks came as he steps up the US military buildup in the Middle East while weighing a military operation to extract nearly 1,000 pounds of uranium from Iran, according to US officials.

He has also encouraged his advisers to press Iran to agree to surrender the material as a condition for ending the war, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing an anonymous source familiar with Trump's thinking.

The Pentagon is reportedly deploying up to 10,000 additional ground troops to the region, with the US Central Command announcing Saturday that over 3,500 troops, including 2,500 Marines, had arrived in the Middle East.

Despite the threat, Trump noted that indirect talks between the United States and Iran via Pakistani "emissaries" were making progress. "A deal could be made fairly quickly," he said.

Oil prices have surged since the United States and Israel launched massive attacks on Iran on February 28, with Brent crude rising as high as $119.5 a barrel in March, the highest since June 2022.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Oil prices are already a nightmare for the common man. If this happens, petrol will become unaffordable. Our government needs to have a strong diplomatic stance and maybe accelerate our own energy independence plans. This kind of talk from a world leader is irresponsible.
R
Rohit P
Honestly, this feels like election-year posturing. "We could take it very easily" sounds like a boast, not a strategy. The human cost and the regional war it could spark would be catastrophic. Hope cooler heads prevail and diplomacy works. The world doesn't need another war.
S
Sarah B
While I understand the strategic importance, the language used is concerning. It undermines international law. India has vital interests in the region - stability, energy security, and the safety of our diaspora. A full-blown conflict would be a disaster on all fronts.
V
Vikram M
This is pure imperialism. First Venezuela, now Iran? Where does it stop? It reminds us why strategic autonomy and strong defence are so crucial for India. We cannot be dependent on any single power for our energy. Jai Hind.
K
Karthik V
With respect, I have to criticize the article's framing a bit. It's heavy on the threat but ends with the note about progress in talks. That's the part we should focus on. War is not an option for anyone. Hope the backchannel diplomacy via Pakistan mentioned here yields results. 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50