Trump says proposed deal explicitly bars Iran from obtaining nuclear weapon
Washington, DC, June 1
US President Donald Trump has strongly countered media reports casting doubt on the nuclear parameters of his envisioned pact with Iran, asserting that the framework unequivocally prohibits Tehran from acquiring a nuclear capability.
Taking to his social media platform, Truth Social, the American leader forcefully dismissed critical coverage concerning the scope of the potential accord.
"Fake News CNN said today, routinely, that my Iran Nuclear Deal doesn't talk about Nuclear, when actually it states, very clearly, that Iran will not have a Nuclear Weapon," Trump wrote.
Defending the robustness of the draft framework, Trump maintained that the text addresses proliferation risks comprehensively rather than superficially.
He added that the agreement "goes on, in very strong and lengthy detail, to discuss various other aspects of Nuclear" and claimed, "In fact, that's what most of the agreement is about."
This public defence from the US President comes just days after he had declared a proposed agreement with Tehran "largely finalised". However, Trump has reportedly since returned the draft text for extensive modifications, extending the diplomatic process and injecting fresh ambiguity into efforts aimed at halting the confrontation.
According to CNN, Trump requested tougher provisions on Iran's nuclear commitments and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz during a crucial meeting with advisers.
The US President has reportedly also expressed concern over the extent of financial relief that could be offered to Tehran under any agreement, wary of comparisons with the Obama-era nuclear deal, which he has repeatedly criticised as too lenient.
The latest round of changes comes a week after Trump said the deal was "largely finalised" and indicated that an end to hostilities was imminent. Since then, US officials have signalled progress towards an agreement that would halt fighting, reopen the strait, and allow for further detailed negotiations on Iran's nuclear programme.
However, despite Trump stating he would make a "final determination" during the Friday meeting and outlining some conditions on social media, the two-hour session concluded without a decision.
In his message, Trump said the US would seize Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium and destroy it, though Iran has consistently said it is not discussing details of its nuclear programme under the current talks.
Trump also said there had been no discussion of exchanging money as part of the deal, while Iran has said financial provisions must be included in any agreement. How these differences will be resolved remains unclear as negotiations continue over the wording of the deal.
Earlier, Axios also reported that Trump had sought revisions to the proposed agreement, including tougher language on the reopening of Hormuz in the deal with Iran.
The legislative leadership in Tehran has responded to these developing American demands with firm rhetoric. Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said on Sunday that no agreement with the US would be approved until Tehran's "rights" are secured, according to the semi-official Tasnim news agency.
"The soldiers of the diplomatic battlefield have no trust in the words and promises of the enemy. What matters to us are tangible achievements that we must obtain, in exchange for which we will fulfil our commitments," Iran's Tasnim news agency quoted him as saying.
Meanwhile, providing a legislative perspective from Washington, Democratic Senator Chris Coons, who sits on the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, said the terms outlined by Trump appear acceptable on paper but may be difficult to implement, particularly regarding the Strait of Hormuz.
— ANI
Reader Comments
Wow, this is exhausting to read. But one thing is clear: Iran is not going to give up easily. Ghalibaf's statement about "no trust" is very telling. India has good relations with both US and Iran, so we must tread carefully with our Chabahar Port and oil imports. 😅
Great, another Trump-era deal that sounds good on paper but will likely collapse. Remember the 2015 JCPOA? India supported that because it stabilized oil prices. Now with Strait of Hormuz reopening, it's good for our energy imports, but Iran's stubbornness on "rights" makes me skeptical. Let's see how this unfolds.
Honestly, as a concerned citizen, I wonder why India isn't more vocal in these talks. We import 80% of our oil and Strait of Hormuz is critical for us. Trump playing games with the deal affects our economy directly. Why can't the US just stick to one stance? 😤
The key issue here is trust. Iran doesn't trust the US (with good reason after Trump pulled out of JCPOA), and the US doesn't trust Iran. India has always advocated for dialogue. But demanding Iran destroy its enriched uranium stockpile? That's a non-starter. Diplomacy needs realism, not ultimatums.
I appreciate Trump trying to get something concrete, but his approach is too erratic. One week it's "largely finalized," next week it's back to the drawing board. Pakistan and China are probably laughing at this chaos. India should quietly secure its energy routes without
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.