NewKerala.com

Trump Pushes for US Control of Greenland to Counter China, Russia

The White House has stated that President Donald Trump believes the United States should acquire Greenland to prevent it from falling under the influence of China or Russia. Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt emphasized that such control is viewed as a strategic priority for U.S. and European security. She suggested the move could also benefit Greenland itself, though no specific timeline has been set for pursuing it. The autonomous Danish territory's Arctic location has become increasingly important due to climate change and great power competition.

Key Points: Trump Wants US to Acquire Greenland for Security

  • Strategic Arctic location
  • Counter China & Russia influence
  • Part of US security priority
  • Potential benefit for Greenland
  • No set timeline for move
2 min read

Trump pushes case for US control of Greenland

White House says President Trump views Greenland as strategically vital and seeks US control to prevent Chinese or Russian influence in the Arctic.

"He feels that if we do not, then it will eventually be acquired... by either China or Russia - Caroline Leavitt"

Washington, Jan 13

President Donald Trump believes the United States should acquire Greenland to prevent it from falling under the influence of rival powers, the White House said.

Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt told reporters that the President views Greenland as strategically vital for US and European security.

"He said that he wants to see the United States acquire Greenland, because he feels that if we do not, then it will eventually be acquired, or even perhaps hostilely taken over by either China or Russia," Leavitt said.

She added that such an outcome would be dangerous for multiple regions.

"Which is not a good thing for the United States or for Europe or for Greenland as well," she said.

Leavitt said the President believes US control could also benefit Greenland itself.

"Let's not forget, it would not just be in the best interest of the United States, but perhaps it would be in the best interest of Greenland as well, to be part of the United States," she said.

Asked whether there is a timeline for pursuing such a move, Leavitt said no deadline has been set.

"He has not set a timeline, but it's definitely a priority," she said.

She emphasised that the President's comments reflect broader national security concerns.

Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, occupies a strategic location in the Arctic and has gained increased attention due to climate change, shipping routes, and competition among global powers. The United States maintains a military presence on the island, while China and Russia have expanded their Arctic ambitions.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The strategic importance of the Arctic is undeniable, but the language of "acquisition" is problematic. It sounds like something from the 19th century. International cooperation, not acquisition, should be the way forward for managing global commons.
V
Vikram M
Honestly, as an Indian, my first thought was about our own borders. Big powers always talk about "strategic interests" while ignoring the sovereignty of smaller nations. We've seen this playbook before. Greenland's wishes should be paramount, not Washington's or Beijing's.
P
Priya S
The White House says it would be "in the best interest of Greenland." How patronising! It's for the people of Greenland to decide what's in their best interest, not a foreign power. This attitude is why many in the Global South are wary of such "offers."
R
Rohit P
The world is getting crowded with superpower competition. First South China Sea, now the Arctic. India needs to watch this closely and ensure its own strategic interests in the polar regions are secured. Our scientific missions there are more important than ever.
M
Michael C
While I understand the security concern regarding Russia and China, the framing is all wrong. You can't just claim to "acquire" a self-governing territory. It undermines the very international order the US says it wants to protect. A more diplomatic approach is needed.
A

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50