Trump Demands Greenland for US Security as White House Talks Begin

President Donald Trump has renewed his push for U.S. control of Greenland, declaring it vital for national security on social media. This comes as senior officials from Denmark and Greenland met with U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the White House. In Congress, competing legislation has been introduced, with one bill seeking to block any acquisition and another authorizing steps toward annexation and statehood. Greenland's strategic importance in the Arctic is growing, but Denmark and Greenland have consistently stated the island is not for sale.

Key Points: Trump Renews Push for US Control of Greenland

  • Trump renews push for US control of Greenland
  • Competing bills in Congress on annexation
  • White House hosts Danish and Greenlandic officials
  • Strategic Arctic value grows as ice melts
4 min read

Trump presses claim on Greenland as White House talks open

Trump calls Greenland vital for US security as White House hosts Danish officials. Competing bills in Congress propose annexation or block acquisition.

"The United States needs Greenland for the purpose of National Security. - Donald Trump"

Washington, Jan 14

President Donald Trump on Wednesday renewed his push for US control of Greenland, declaring on social media that the Arctic island was vital to American national security, as senior officials from Denmark and Greenland began talks at the White House.

"The United States needs Greenland for the purpose of National Security," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "It is vital for the Golden Dome that we are building. NATO should be leading the way for us to get it. IF WE DON'T, RUSSIA OR CHINA WILL, AND THAT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!"

In a second post, Trump urged action from the alliance, writing: "NATO: Tell Denmark to get them out of here, NOW! Two dogsleds won't do it! Only the USA can!!!"

The remarks came as Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Greenlandic Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt met US Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the White House a few hours earlier. The talks are expected to focus on Greenland's security and growing competition in the Arctic.

Trump has repeatedly argued that ownership of Greenland is essential for defence. In earlier comments, he said the United States would act on Greenland "whether they like it or not," warning that Russia or China would otherwise expand their presence near the island.

The renewed rhetoric has sharpened divisions in Washington and triggered competing responses in Congress.

On Tuesday, Democratic Congressman Jimmy Gomez of California introduced the Greenland Sovereignty Protection Act. The bill would prohibit the use of federal funds to support or facilitate the invasion, annexation, purchase or any other form of acquisition of Greenland by the United States.

"Greenland is not for sale, not for conquest, and not a bargaining chip," Gomez said. He warned that threatening an ally undermines international law and weakens NATO. The bill, he said, would prevent Congress from funding what he called Trump's "imperial fantasies."

The legislation would block funding for any activity tied to acquiring Greenland. It would also bar increases in US military presence or financial investment there without explicit congressional approval. US-funded influence campaigns aimed at shaping Greenland's political self-determination would also be prohibited. Any waiver would require new legislation that directly references the Act.

Gomez's office said the measure is not intended to alter existing US defence cooperation with Denmark and Greenland under NATO and other agreements. Instead, it seeks to prevent unilateral action outside established international frameworks.

A day earlier, Republican Congressman Randy Fine of Florida introduced the Greenland Annexation and Statehood Act, taking the opposite approach.

"Greenland is not a distant outpost we can afford to ignore-it is a vital national security asset," Fine said. He argued that control of Greenland is critical to Arctic shipping lanes and US security and warned against allowing China and Russia to expand their influence in the region.

Fine said years of weak US policy had eroded America's strategic position. His bill would authorise the president to take "whatever steps necessary" to annex or acquire Greenland as a US territory and require a report to Congress outlining legal changes needed to admit Greenland as a US state.

Separately, Senator Chris Coons is leading a bipartisan congressional delegation to Copenhagen this week to reaffirm US support for Denmark and NATO. He said the visit would signal Congress' commitment to alliances and sovereignty.

Greenland's strategic value has grown as Arctic ice melts and new shipping routes open. Denmark and Greenland have repeatedly said the island is not for sale, while critics of annexation warn that any attempt to acquire it by force or pressure would weaken NATO unity and international law.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The strategic importance of the Arctic is undeniable, but the approach matters. Unilateral annexation fantasies are dangerous. The US should work within NATO frameworks, not threaten allies. Congressman Gomez's bill seems like a necessary check.
V
Vikram M
From an Indian perspective, we see how great power rivalry plays out. China and Russia are indeed expanding their reach. But the solution isn't colonial-era land grabs. It's stronger diplomacy and cooperation. The "whether they like it or not" line is deeply troubling.
R
Rohit P
Honestly, this feels like a distraction. The US has so many internal issues. Why this sudden obsession with Greenland? The "Golden Dome" reference is bizarre. Focus on your own country first, no? 🤷‍♂️
P
Priya S
Respectfully, while I understand the security concerns, the language used is not becoming of a world leader. It undermines the very alliances you claim to need. Senator Coons's delegation to Copenhagen is the right approach—reassurance, not threats.
M
Michael C
The Arctic is the new frontier. Melting ice means new trade routes and resources. The US cannot afford to be naive. However, Congressman Fine's bill authorizing "whatever steps necessary" is too broad and sets a terrible precedent. There has to be a middle path.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50