Trump Bans Federal Use of Anthropic AI in Clash Over Military Ethics

President Donald Trump has ordered all federal agencies to immediately cease using technology from AI company Anthropic, escalating a public clash over military applications. The dispute centers on Anthropic's refusal to allow its Claude AI model to be used for mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons systems. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth designated Anthropic a supply-chain risk to national security, barring military contractors from doing business with the company. Democratic lawmakers have condemned the move as political retaliation and an abuse of government power.

Key Points: Trump Halts Federal Use of Anthropic AI Over Military Dispute

  • Federal ban on Anthropic AI tech
  • Dispute over autonomous weapons & surveillance
  • Six-month phase-out ordered
  • Company faces supply-chain risk designation
3 min read

Trump orders halt to Anthropic use

President Trump orders all federal agencies to stop using Anthropic's AI, escalating a conflict over autonomous weapons and domestic surveillance.

"THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS! - Donald Trump"

Washington, Feb 28

US President Donald Trump ordered all federal agencies to immediately stop using technology from the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, escalating a public clash over the military use of advanced AI systems.

"THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. He said the company had made a "DISASTROUS MISTAKE" by trying to "STRONG-ARM the Department of War, and force them to obey their Terms of Service instead of our Constitution."

Trump directed "EVERY Federal Agency in the United States Government to IMMEDIATELY CEASE all use of Anthropic's technology." He announced a six-month phase-out period for agencies already using its products and warned of "major civil and criminal consequences" if the company did not cooperate.

The dispute centres on Anthropic's refusal to allow two uses of its AI model, Claude: mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons.

In a statement, Anthropic said it had reached an impasse with the Department of War over "two exceptions we requested to the lawful use of our AI model, Claude: the mass domestic surveillance of Americans and fully autonomous weapons."

The company said it had "tried in good faith to reach an agreement" and supported "all lawful uses of AI for national security aside from the two narrow exceptions above." It added that, "To the best of our knowledge, these exceptions have not affected a single government mission to date."

Anthropic argued that "today's frontier AI models are reliable enough to be used in fully autonomous weapons" and that allowing such use "would endanger America's warfighters and civilians." It also said "mass domestic surveillance of Americans constitutes a violation of fundamental rights."

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said he was directing the Department to designate Anthropic "a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security." He wrote on X that "the Department of War must have full, unrestricted access to Anthropic's models for every LAWFUL purpose in defense of the Republic."

"Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic," Hegseth said, while allowing the company to continue services for "no more than six months to allow for a seamless transition."

Anthropic countered that such a designation would be "an unprecedented action-one historically reserved for US adversaries, never before publicly applied to an American company." It said it would "challenge any supply chain risk designation in court."

The move was slammed by the opposition Democratic lawmaker. Senator Mark Warner said the president's directive and "inflammatory rhetoric" raised "serious concerns about whether national security decisions are being driven by careful analysis or political considerations."

In a joint statement, Senators Chris Van Hollen and Edward Markey called the Pentagon's actions "an extraordinary and deeply alarming abuse of government power" and said, "This is retaliation, and it is unacceptable."

Representative Zoe Lofgren described the administration's approach as "bullying tactics," while Congresswoman Valerie Foushee warned that "AI companies have a responsibility to stand by the safeguards they publicly embraced."

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As an Indian watching this, I appreciate Anthropic's stance. We know the dangers of unchecked surveillance. Fully autonomous weapons are a terrifying concept—machines deciding who lives and dies? No thank you. 🇮🇳 Our own tech companies should take note and build in strong ethical safeguards from the start.
M
Michael C
The company is right to challenge this. Calling them a "Supply-Chain Risk" for refusing to enable mass spying on citizens is an overreach. It sets a dangerous precedent. If this happened in India, there would be massive public outcry. The executive branch shouldn't have this much unilateral power over private companies.
R
Rohit P
Typical Trump drama. But stripping away the noise, it's a serious debate. The military needs advanced tools, but where do we draw the line? In our context, with tensions on the borders, we rely on tech for security. But autonomous weapons? That's a red line we shouldn't cross either. Hope our DRDO is watching this closely.
S
Sarah B
While I understand the need for strong national defense, the "woke" rhetoric is unhelpful. This is about ethics, not politics. The company's exceptions seem reasonable. Mass domestic surveillance is a slippery slope to authoritarianism. India has a strong judiciary that would hopefully check such overreach if it happened here.
K
Karthik V
The six-month phase-out shows even they know it's disruptive. This feels like a strong-arm tactic to make other companies fall in line. Jai ho to Anthropic for standing firm. In India, we need our tech giants to show similar spine on privacy issues instead of just

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50