Trump Opposes UK Plan to Transfer Diego Garcia Base Control to Mauritius

US President Donald Trump has publicly opposed a British plan to hand control of the Diego Garcia military base to Mauritius under a leaseback arrangement. He questioned London's motivations, suggesting financial need, and emphasized the base's strategic importance for global security. The facility is a major hub for US air and naval operations across the Middle East, Africa, and the Indo-Pacific. Trump's sharp opposition signals potential complications for the proposed transfer, which could alter military planning in the region.

Key Points: Trump Rejects UK Plan for Diego Garcia Base Handover

  • Trump opposes UK-Mauritius base deal
  • Questions Britain's financial motives
  • Calls Diego Garcia strategically important
  • Base is key for US operations in Indian Ocean
  • Remarks signal firm US stance
2 min read

Trump opposes British plan on Diego Garcia base

US President Donald Trump opposes British proposal to give Diego Garcia military base to Mauritius, calling it a key strategic asset.

"I'm against that... I don't know why they're doing it. Do they need money? - Donald Trump"

Washington, Jan 21

US President Donald Trump said he opposed a British plan to hand control of the Diego Garcia military base to Mauritius and then lease it back, questioning why London would give up what he called an important strategic asset.

Speaking at a White House media availability marking one year since his return to office, Trump said he did not support the arrangement involving Diego Garcia, a joint US-UK military base in the Indian Ocean. "I'm against that," he said, adding that the area was "a reasonably important area of the globe."

Trump said earlier discussions appeared to involve continued ownership, but argued the current proposal amounted to a lease-and-sale structure. "When they originally were going to do it, they were talking about doing some concept of ownership," he said. "Now they're looking to essentially just do a lease and sell it. And I'm against that."

He questioned Britain's motivation for the move. "I don't know why they're doing it," Trump said. "Do they need money?"

While noting the base was "nothing like Greenland," Trump said Diego Garcia still mattered for security. He did not outline specific steps Washington might take, but made clear his opposition to the plan.

The proposal involves the United Kingdom and Mauritius and the future of the British Indian Ocean Territory, which includes Diego Garcia. The base hosts a major US military facility used for air and naval operations across the Middle East, Africa and the Indo-Pacific.

Trump's remarks came as he fielded questions on a range of strategic issues, including Greenland. Asked how far he was willing to go there, he replied: "You'll find out," and suggested tariffs or other tools could be used. On Diego Garcia, his tone was sharper, signalling clear opposition.

He did not refer to India, but the base's location near key sea lanes places it within the wider Indo-Pacific region. The facility has long been seen as a cornerstone of US and allied military presence in the Indian Ocean.

Trump said he was heading to Davos and had "a lot of meetings scheduled," without detailing whether the base would be discussed with allies.

The comments are likely to be closely watched by security officials and regional partners. Any change in the status of Diego Garcia could affect military planning and the balance of power in the Indian Ocean.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Trump questioning if Britain "needs money" is so typical of him! 😂 But on a serious note, this base is in our backyard. India should have a say in any changes to the security architecture of the Indian Ocean. We can't have major powers making all the decisions that affect our region.
A
Arjun K
The strategic importance of Diego Garcia for monitoring sea lanes, especially near the Strait of Malacca, is immense. While the US-UK alliance is strong, handing control to Mauritius could introduce new variables. India must engage diplomatically to ensure its interests in a free and open Indo-Pacific are protected.
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see this from an outside perspective. The lease-back model seems like a diplomatic fudge. But Trump's blunt opposition might just complicate things further. Stability in the Indian Ocean benefits everyone, including global trade.
V
Vikram M
Respectfully, I think some comments are missing the point about Mauritian sovereignty. It's their island, taken by the UK. The Chagossians were displaced. This isn't just about big power strategy. A fair solution that addresses historical wrongs is needed, even if it's complicated for military planners.
K
Kavya N
The article mentions it's a cornerstone for the region. With China's increasing presence in the Indian Ocean, any weakening of the US/UK position could create a vacuum. India needs to strengthen its own naval capabilities and partnerships, regardless of what happens with Diego Garcia. Jai Hind!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50