Trump Rejects Iran’s New Peace Proposal Over Nuclear Concerns

US President Donald Trump is reportedly not satisfied with Iran's latest peace proposal, which aims to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the US naval blockade while deferring nuclear negotiations. The proposal was discussed in a White House meeting with top national security officials, where Trump indicated he was unlikely to accept it. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged the proposal was better than expected but stressed any deal must prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi blamed the slow diplomatic progress on US "destructive habits," including unreasonable demands and broken promises.

Key Points: Trump Rejects Iran’s New Peace Proposal

  • Trump unhappy with Iran's proposal to reopen Strait of Hormuz
  • Proposal leaves nuclear program for later talks
  • US insists Iran must not develop nuclear weapons
  • Iran blames US for slow diplomacy citing broken promises
3 min read

Trump not satisfied with Iran's new peace proposal: Report

US President Donald Trump is not satisfied with Iran's latest peace proposal, which seeks to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the blockade.

"The main reasons for the slow progress of diplomacy are the US continuation of its destructive habits - Seyed Abbas Araghchi"

Washington, April 28

US President Donald Trump is not satisfied with Iran's latest peace proposal, which seeks to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the US naval blockade of Iran's ports, while leaving its nuclear program for later negotiations, US media reported, citing several White House officials.

The president discussed Iran's proposal with his top national security officials at a meeting in the White House Situation Room on Monday afternoon, said the reports.

One of the people attending the meeting said Trump was not likely to accept Iran's proposal, which was delivered to the United States over the last few days, reports Xinhua news agency, quoting CNN.

A US official told The New York Times that accepting the proposal could appear to deny Trump a victory since the president has repeatedly insisted that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons.

In an interview with Fox News on Monday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Iran's new proposal "is better than what we thought they were going to submit," but stressed any deal must bar Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon.

Trump insisted last week that any peace deal with Iran would be made on US terms and his timeline, claiming there is "no time frame" for ending the US-Israeli war with Iran and "no time pressure" on either the extended ceasefire or stalled talks.

Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi on Monday blamed the slow progress of diplomacy between Iran and the United States on the latter's continuation of its "destructive habits."

He made the remarks in a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Saint Petersburg, which was also attended by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, among others, read a statement released by the Iranian Foreign Ministry.

Elaborating on the diplomatic process to end the war and establish peace and security in the West Asia region and the Strait of Hormuz, Araghchi said, "The main reasons for the slow progress of diplomacy are the US continuation of its destructive habits, especially its insistence on putting forward unreasonable demands, frequently changing positions, rhetoric of threat and recurrent breaking of promises."

He said Iran will make an appropriate decision about the current diplomatic process while taking into consideration its previous experiences, "especially the two military aggressions (by the United States and Israel) against the country in the middle of diplomatic negotiations, attacks on its peaceful nuclear facilities, as well as the US addiction to sanctions and economic pressure and continued piracy against Iranian commercial vessels."

On February 28, Israel and the United States launched joint attacks on Tehran and other Iranian cities, killing Iran's then Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, senior commanders, and civilians. Iran responded with waves of missile and drone strikes targeting Israel and US interests in the Middle East, and tightened control over the Strait of Hormuz.

A ceasefire was achieved between the warring parties on April 8, followed by lengthy talks between the Iranian and US delegations in Pakistan's capital, Islamabad, which failed to yield an agreement. The United States later imposed its own blockade on the waterway.

Iranian and US delegations were reportedly expected to hold another round of peace talks in Pakistan last week, but Iran refrained from attending the negotiations, citing the US continued naval blockade and "excessive" demands as main reasons.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Iran is literally saying "we'll talk about nukes later" - of course Trump rejected it! But can we blame Iran? After US and Israel killed their Supreme Leader, attacked their nuclear facilities, and still keep sanctions... koi bhi trust nahi karega. India should stay neutral here, we need good relations with both US and Iran. 🤔
J
James A
Trump says "no time frame" but meanwhile oil prices are hurting everyone. As an American living in India, I see both sides. Iran's proposal might be thin, but US keeps changing demands too. The Strait of Hormuz crisis is affecting global supply chains, Indian companies are already feeling it. Russia backing Iran makes this even more complex. Time for both sides to think about common people, not just their egos.
V
Vikram M
Aree bhai, this is getting ridiculous. Trump wants total victory, Iran wants no nuke commitment. Meanwhile our families are paying ₹110 for petrol in Mumbai! 🤦‍♂️ India needs to step up as a neutral mediator - we have credibility with both sides. Remember how we helped during the 2019 tensions? This time it's personal because of oil supplies. PM Modi should arrange talks in India, not just Pakistan.
S
Sarah B
As someone who follows geopolitics, this is a dangerous stalemate. Iran's proposal might be their way of testing Trump's seriousness. But US should have learned from Iraq that regime change through force doesn't work. India's strategic autonomy is crucial here - we should not be dragged into US-Israel axis. Our diplomats need to engage both parties to protect our energy security and diaspora in the region.
R

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50