Trump Pauses Iran Strikes Over Global Energy Market Fears, Expert Says

An expert states President Trump's hesitation to strike Iran's energy infrastructure is driven by concerns over destabilizing already unsettled global energy markets. Ali Vaez warns such attacks could trigger Iranian retaliation on Gulf energy facilities and Israel's grid, causing a severe, long-term reduction in oil and gas production. While framed as a diplomatic pause, Vaez suggests Washington may be preparing for a major escalation to shift the conflict's trajectory. Trump has extended the pause on strikes, citing productive talks with Tehran, after previously issuing threats to target Iranian energy sites.

Key Points: Trump Holds Back Iran Strikes Due to Market Concerns

  • Strike pause over market fears
  • Threat to Iran's energy grid
  • Risk of Gulf & Israel retaliation
  • Lasting production loss possible
  • Diplomacy masks prep for escalation
4 min read

Trump holding back on strikes on Iran's energy infra because of market concerns: Expert

Expert reveals Trump's pause on Iran energy strikes stems from fears of a global energy market "nightmare scenario" and severe supply shocks.

"This presents a nightmare scenario for global energy markets - Ali Vaez"

Istanbul Marc, h 28

US President Donald Trump's decision to pause strikes on Iran's energy infrastructure amid the ongoing conflict in West Asia is due to the mounting concerns over the global energy market, according to Ali Vaez, Director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group.

Speaking to ANI on Friday, Vaez said President Trump's hesitation stems from his understanding that global markets are already deeply unsettled by the prospect of further escalation of the conflict and noted that Trump had earlier threatened to destroy Iran's energy infrastructure and electrical grid, a move that Tehran warned would prompt retaliatory attacks on energy facilities in the Gulf and even Israel's grid - a scenario that analysts have described as a "nightmare for global energy markets".

"I think the President has been hesitating because he understands that markets are deeply concerned about the consequences of further escalation in this conflict. He had threatened to destroy Iran's energy infrastructure and electrical grid, while Iran warned it would retaliate by targeting energy facilities in Gulf states and attacking Israel's grid. This presents a nightmare scenario for global energy markets, as it would not just cause a temporary dip in exports but a serious reduction in production for months or even years," he said.

Vaez highlighted that such strikes would not merely cause a temporary dip in exports but could lead to a lasting reduction in oil and gas production for months or even years, triggering severe supply shocks and price volatility worldwide.

The expert added that while the pause has been framed as part of ongoing diplomacy, Washington may still be preparing for a "masterstroke escalation" intended to change the trajectory of the conflict in its favor.

"Already, 17 per cent of Qatar's natural gas production capacity has been lost, with recovery expected to take three to five years. So the president reassured the market by saying that there is serious diplomacy going on while he is actually preparing for a masterstroke escalation to try to change the tide of the conflict in his way," he added.

Earlier on Thursday, Trump stated that he is extending the pause on strikes targeting Iran's energy infrastructure for an additional 10 days, till April 6, 2026, as part of the ongoing diplomatic talks between the two sides.

In a post on Truth Social, the US President claimed that the announcement comes as per a "request" from the Iranian Government and further stated that the negotiations with Tehran were "going very well".

"As per Iranian Government request, please let this statement serve to represent that I am pausing the period of Energy Plant destruction by 10 Days to Monday, April 6, 2026, at 8 P.M., Eastern Time. Talks are ongoing and, despite erroneous statements to the contrary by the Fake News Media, and others, they are going very well," the post read.

On Monday, Trump announced that he had instructed the US Department of War to delay any military action against Iranian power plants and energy sites for five days, citing ongoing diplomatic engagements with Tehran amid escalating tensions in West Asia.

In another post on Truth Social, Trump said the United States and Iran had held "very good and productive conversations" aimed at resolving hostilities in the region and added that the decision to pause strikes was based on the "tenor and tone" of the discussions, which he described as "in-depth, detailed, and constructive".

Prior to his announcement on Monday, Trump on Saturday issued a warning to Tehran, giving it 48 hours to open the strategically significant Strait of Hormuz or face potential strikes on its energy facilities.

Trump's latest extension of deadlines -- first moved from Monday to Friday with a five-day reprieve and now pushed back by another 10 days -- underscores the shifting timelines amid evolving developments.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The expert's point about a "masterstroke escalation" is chilling. It feels like we're all just waiting for the other shoe to drop. This constant brinkmanship is terrible for everyone. As an Indian, I'm just praying for peace—our economy and millions of expat workers in the Gulf can't handle another crisis.
R
Rohit P
Finally some sense! Attacking energy infrastructure is a recipe for a decade-long disaster, as we saw with Qatar's gas. Let's hope this pause becomes permanent. The world, especially developing economies like India, cannot afford another supply shock. Diplomacy is the only way.
S
Sarah B
While I'm relieved for the pause, the framing is problematic. Calling it an "Iranian Government request" on Truth Social seems like a face-saving move. Real diplomacy shouldn't need these public theatrics. The volatility is already causing anxiety in markets here.
V
Vikram M
The Strait of Hormuz threat last week had my father, who works in shipping, extremely worried. 20% of the world's oil passes through there. A blockade or attack would send petrol prices in India through the roof overnight. This temporary calm is not enough; we need a lasting solution.
K
Karthik V
It's high time global leaders realized their conflicts have worldwide ripple effects. The "nightmare scenario" described would devastate not just the West but also countries like India that are heavily dependent on energy imports. Hope wisdom prevails.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50