Trump Pushes for Long-Term Ukraine Deal After Talks with Zelensky and Putin

President Trump has instructed his negotiators to secure a lasting agreement to prevent a renewed Ukraine war following a series of high-level diplomatic engagements. Talks in Davos, Abu Dhabi, and Russia, described as very productive, established a trilateral format with the US facilitating between Ukraine and Russia. Negotiators addressed ceasefire efforts, territorial disputes, security guarantees, and economic issues including the future of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant. Further discussions are planned in Abu Dhabi to advance these complex negotiations.

Key Points: Trump Directs Team to Pursue Long-Term Ukraine War Deal

  • Trilateral US-Ukraine-Russia format established
  • Focus on ceasefire and post-war security
  • Sticking points include territory and security guarantees
  • Economic issues like Zaporizhzhia plant discussed
  • More talks scheduled in Abu Dhabi
3 min read

Trump asks his negotiating team to pursue long-term deal in Ukraine: Official

US officials say Trump seeks enduring Ukraine agreement after productive talks involving Zelensky and Putin in Davos, Abu Dhabi, and Russia.

"very, very productive - US officials on discussions with Putin"

Washington, Jan 25

US President Donald Trump has directed his negotiating team to pursue a long-term deal to prevent a recurrence of the Ukraine war, senior administration officials said following what they described as productive discussions involving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Recent diplomatic engagements in Davos, Abu Dhabi, and Russia focused on resolving what they termed the remaining open issues in the conflict, including security, prosperity, frozen assets, territory, and de-escalation, according to senior administration officials.

Officials said the discussions have led to agreement on a trilateral format. This involves Ukraine and Russia, with the United States facilitating.

A senior official said President Trump met President Zelensky in Davos and reviewed progress from recent months. This meeting helped Trump give new instructions to his negotiating team. Later, there were meetings in Abu Dhabi and a four-hour discussion with President Putin in Russia. US officials described these as "very, very productive."

According to the official, the Abu Dhabi engagement was a critical step toward a new phase in negotiations. US officials said it took weeks of effort to organize a trilateral setting. Ukrainian and Russian leaders agreed only after believing talks had progressed enough for technical discussions.

The trilateral meeting included both military and political participants, with Ukrainian officials in attendance. The talks lasted two days and featured extensive informal discussions. Negotiators focused on de-escalation, exploring measures to assure both sides that the war would not resume once it ends.

Senior administration officials said President Trump wants an agreement that endures. The goal is to set up a framework and a new paradigm. They said this would prevent future conflict and reduce the risk of renewed fighting.

Discussions covered many issues, including security and economic considerations. Officials said this showed the wide scope of the negotiations.

Officials also noted the positive tone of interactions. They said it was significant to see Ukrainian and Russian representatives engage directly and respectfully after a long break. The talks let both sides share opinions, concerns, and ideas freely. This led to what officials called a fluid and productive atmosphere.

Administration officials said more talks are expected in the coming days. Ukrainian and Russian officials will meet again in Abu Dhabi for more discussions. These talks will focus on advancing ceasefire efforts.

Those talks, officials said, marked the first time representatives from all three countries sat face to face to try to hash out a ceasefire. The talks covered economic and military issues, as well as territorial disputes over land Russia would retain after the war. US officials, speaking anonymously, said these remain among the most sensitive and unresolved questions.

President Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner led the meetings. They met President Zelensky in Switzerland. Afterwards, they traveled to Moscow to discuss with President Putin. Senior US military officials, including the head of US European Command and NATO forces, later joined them.

One of the major sticking points identified by US officials is the question of post-war security guarantees for Ukraine. European countries have advocated a limited troop presence to monitor a ceasefire, while US officials have indicated that American support would focus on intelligence, surveillance, and logistics rather than deploying troops on the ground.

The talks addressed economic issues, including the future of Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, now occupied by Russian forces. No agreement was reached. US officials said proposals were discussed for Ukraine and Russia to share electricity from the facility, the largest nuclear plant in Europe.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
A trilateral format with the US facilitating is interesting, but the proof will be in the details. Sharing electricity from a nuclear plant under occupation? That sounds incredibly complex and risky. Hope they prioritize safety above all.
V
Vikram M
The focus on a "new paradigm" to prevent future conflict is crucial. We've seen in our own neighborhood how unresolved territorial disputes can fester for decades. A durable solution is needed, not just a temporary ceasefire. Jai Hind.
R
Rohit P
Respectfully, I'm skeptical. The article mentions "territory Russia would retain" as a sensitive issue. Any deal that legitimizes land grab through war sets a dangerous precedent for the world order. Ukraine's sovereignty must be the cornerstone.
P
Priya S
Getting them to talk directly after so long is a big achievement in itself. Hope this leads to peace. The world's attention and resources are needed elsewhere too – for development, climate change, and poverty eradication.
D
David E
The US not committing ground troops for security guarantees is a pragmatic move. Endless foreign deployments haven't always led to stability. A focus on intelligence and logistics support might be more sustainable in the long run.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50