Tamil Nadu Tightens Sand Mining Rules with Refundable Security Deposit System

The Tamil Nadu government has amended the Minor Mineral Concession Rules to introduce a refundable security deposit system for those removing sand and other minerals from government lands and tanks. Applicants must now pay a deposit equivalent to twice the seigniorage fee, alongside a significantly increased application fee. The revised rules empower District Collectors to cancel permits after a hearing and establish detailed recovery mechanisms for violations and restoration costs. A new post-operation inspection clause ensures accountability before security deposits are refunded.

Key Points: TN Amends Mineral Rules, Adds Security Deposit for Sand Removal

  • Refundable security deposit introduced
  • Application fee increased to Rs 5,000
  • District Collector empowered to cancel permits
  • Post-operation inspection mandated
  • Recovery mechanisms for violations strengthened
3 min read

TN tightens minor mineral rules, introduces refundable security deposit for sand removal

Tamil Nadu introduces refundable security deposits and higher fees for sand and minor mineral removal to strengthen oversight and protect waterbodies.

"The move is aimed at strengthening regulatory oversight, preventing excess quarrying, and ensuring the protection and restoration of waterbodies. - Tamil Nadu Government"

Chennai, Jan 28

The Tamil Nadu government has amended key provisions of the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959, introducing a refundable security deposit system for permission-holders seeking to remove sand and other minor minerals from lands and tanks under the control of various government departments.

The move is aimed at strengthening regulatory oversight, preventing excess quarrying, and ensuring the protection and restoration of waterbodies.

Under the revised rules, applicants seeking permission to remove sand or other minor minerals must now pay a refundable security deposit in addition to the application fee. The security deposit will be equivalent to two times the seigniorage fee payable for the quantity of mineral applied for.

At the same time, the government has significantly increased the application fee from Rs 1,500 to Rs 5,000. The amended provisions also redefine the procedure to be followed in cases where a permission-holder exceeds the permitted quantity of mineral removal or violates the conditions attached to the permission.

As per the new rule, the District Collector is empowered to cancel the permission after providing the permission-holder an opportunity to be heard. In such cases, the difference in the seigniorage fee and the cost of the mineral for the quantity quarried and removed will be recovered from the permission-holder.

Additionally, any expenditure incurred by the government for restoring tanks or other affected areas will be adjusted against the security deposit. If the total amount recoverable exceeds the deposited security amount, the balance will be recovered from the permission-holder under the provisions of the Revenue Recovery Act, 1890.

Earlier, the rules provided for automatic cancellation of permission if excess quarrying or violation of conditions was detected, with damages recovered based on the excess quantity removed and the extent of damage caused to the tanks.

The revised framework introduces a more structured process, including hearings and detailed recovery mechanisms, while placing greater financial responsibility on permission-holders.

The government has also inserted a new clause to ensure post-operation accountability. On the expiry of the permission period or upon exhaustion of the permitted quantity -- whichever occurs earlier -- authorities must inspect to verify compliance with the stipulated conditions.

A report of this inspection will be submitted to the concerned District Collector. Based on this report, the District Collector is required to pass a written order refunding the security deposit to the permission-holder, provided all conditions have been complied with.

The amendments are expected to act as a deterrent against illegal mining while ensuring better conservation of tanks and public lands.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
While the intent is excellent, I'm worried about implementation. Will the District Collector's office have the manpower and integrity to conduct proper inspections? The rules sound good on paper, but we've seen good policies fail due to corruption at the local level.
V
Vikram M
The application fee hike from ₹1500 to ₹5000 is quite steep for small operators. I understand the need for regulation, but this could hurt legitimate small-scale businesses. The government should have a graded fee structure based on the quantity applied for.
A
Ananya R
Finally! Our village tank was ruined by unchecked sand removal last year. The water level dropped so much that farmers suffered. This accountability measure is long overdue. Protecting our water sources is protecting our future. 🙏
M
Michael C
Interesting policy. The refundable security deposit tied to restoration costs is a smart economic instrument. It internalizes the environmental externality. The hearing process before cancellation also adds procedural fairness. A well-designed regulatory update.
K
Karthik V
The key is the "post-operation accountability" and mandatory inspection. For years, permissions were given and no one checked what happened afterwards. If they actually do these inspections properly, it will be a game-changer for conservation in Tamil Nadu.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50